Impact of "free will" on fate of the entire humanity
(bilingual: in
English and
Polish )
(This page is still being translated from Polish to English)
Updated:
12 December 2012
Click "X" or "No" on e.g. messages of supposed errors, or on advertisements, if these try to interrupt your viewing of this web page.
Here
is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 2.)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
In science it is called "simulation".
Namely, if scientists wish to get to
know better what actually happens
in some real situation, then they build
so-called "model" that can be researched.
This "model" simulates a given real
situation and also simulates processes
that take place in this situation.
Then scientists watch on this model
what actually does happen in there.
It can be noted that something
very strange happens in present
times with the entire human
civilisation. Many people begin
to ask "what
God
is doing that matters went so bad?"
So let us build on this web page a
"model" of God, and then let us "simulate"
putting ourselves into the situation
of God. Thus probably we are going
to notice what actually does happen
around us. This in turn is to provide
us with the answer as to whether God
really lost His control over humanity.
Or perhaps whatever we see happening
around us is simply caused by the
God's iron hand and by His strict
control over the goals and destines
that He already pre-planed for us.
Part #A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
What are goals of this web page:
The main goal of this web page is very
simple. Namely it depends on an attempt
to put ourselves in the situation of
God.
In turn, due to this putting ourselves in the
situation of God (or "simulating the God's
position"), we will attempt to understand
what actually does happen in the present
world, and thus what should be our role in
present events, how we should help God
by volunteering right roles for implementation,
and also what we should expect that most
probably it awaits us in a near future.
An additional goal of this web page is to make
the reader to realise several facts about God,
which facts directly result from the scientific
simulation of the situation of God. Because
the realising of these facts is an outcome of
the simulation of the God's situation, it does
not remove the free will from people who
learn about these facts. On the other hand,
such a scientific simulation gives the level
of correctness similar to the level that would
create a manifestation of God and His personal
summarising these facts to us. But simultaneously
the simulation is not as unambiguous and as
threatening as would be the perception of
a possible message from God Himself.
After all, a scientific simulation can be accepted,
rejected, or interpreted as anyone wishes -
means according to anyone's free will and
the anyone's philosophy of life.
#A2.
What motivated me to prepare this web page:
Motto:
"Technical development minus morality is equal
to macabre world that the to-date human science
created for us at the beginning of 21st century."
Practically each one of us is wondering
whether God does exist, whether we have
eternal soul, what is the goal of our existence,
what awaits the humanity in a near future,
how we should act in our lives, etc., etc.
I also belong to the group of people asking
this kind of questions. But there is a significant
difference between myself and others who ask.
After all, because I am a professional scientist,
I managed to find not only the answer to these
questions, but also identify a wealth of scientific
evidence which confirms that my answer is this
correct one.
Probably I am the only researcher on the Earth
who have found a key to the scientific understanding of
God
and to a rational getting to know this superior
being with the use of modern scientific methods.
This key turned out to be the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
It is because of this "theory of everything", that
I managed to determine where, when, and how
the self-evolution of God took place. Outcomes
of this determination are described in item #B1
of the web page
evolution.htm - about problems of natural evolution.
It is also because of this "theory of everything",
that I managed to formulate several formal scientific
proofs for the existence of God, soul, other world,
etc. These formal proofs are described:
in item #B3 of the web page
god.htm - with scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God
(see in there the "formal scientific proof for
the existence of God"), in item #C1.1 of the web page
nirvana.htm - about the totaliztic nirvana
(see in there the "formal scientific proof for
the existence of eternal human soul"), in item
#D3 of the web page
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(see in there the "formal scientific proof for
the existence of the counter-world"), and in
several further
totaliztic
web pages. Only because of findings of this
"theory of everything" I was also able to indicate
to other people an entire wealth of empirical
evidence for the existence of God, which (the
evidence) so-far was either overlooked, or
intentionally ignored by the official human
science. (Descriptions of this empirical
evidence are provided on the web page
entirely devoted to it and named
god_proof.htm,
as well as in items #F1 to #F3 of the totaliztic web page
bible.htm - about the Bible authorised-inspired by God Himself.)
When formulating these formal scientific proofs
for the existence of God, and while researching
God with scientific methods, I had numerous
opportunities to have a close look at what would
happen if all people unanimously recognised my
proofs and rapidly started to believe (as strongly
as I do) that God in fact does exist. A positive
consequence of such a rapid converting of
all atheists into the belief in God would be,
of course, that almost instantly all people
would begin to act morally. Means, that would
disappear: crime, lies, cheating, killing, exploitation,
wars, etc., etc. However, in the present situation
of our civilisation, when people still just only
"worship God" instead of researching Him
and instead of obeying laws that He established,
various undesirable consequences of such
unanimous belief in God would also appear.
Namely, almost completely would then
diminish the accumulation of knowledge
and the human motivation to investigate
the universe. After all,
in present circumstances, for so-called
"typical bread eaters" the consequence
of being sure that God does exist is to
loose the motivations for investigating
and for analysing the world around us -
see item #C3 in the further part of this
web page. For every question about anything,
for these ones who strongly believe in God
is just a single reply, namely "because God
created it so, and He controls it in just such
a manner". Believers in God notoriously
keep ignoring the well-known principle
that "God helps only those people who
help themselves", and that by failing to
act even saints get nowhere.
In order to summarise the above,
typical consequences
of increasing the faith in God in present
circumstances are: an increase in morality of people,
which is accompanied by the simultaneous decrease
in knowledge, disappearance of scientific research,
and the lack of motivation for creative searches.
Of course, if these are us who put ourselves in
the position of God, we would NOT like the situation
when all people believe in Us and all people worship
Us, when all people act morally, but simultaneously
the progress of knowledge and technology rapidly
falls down. After all, in such a situation the human
civilisation would never advance to a higher level
of development.
So in our interest as God, would lie finding a way
to inspire in people somehow the creative
searches and the increase in their knowledge.
As it turns out, this way depends on persuading some
people into the so-called "atheism". Atheists from the
very definition are forced to find out which mechanisms
hide behind events around them. After all, they
negate God as the source of these mechanisms.
As such, the "atheism" is the propelling force for
the progress of knowledge and for the technical
development of our civilisation. Unfortunately, the
"atheism" has this drawback, that it causes also
a moral decadency. This is because without believing
in the existence of God and without believing in
the existence of eternal soul, atheists try to gain
from the life as much as they only can for as little
as they manage to get away with. But since the
morality stands on their way, then to hell with the
morality. In order to summarise the above,
typical consequence
of "atheism" is the increase of knowledge and the fast
technical progress, which, however, is accompanied
by the simultaneous drop in the level of morality
amongst people.
Each one amongst two situations on the Earth described
before has its drawbacks. Namely, if all people
are believers in God, then the science, progress,
and motivations of people to improve their situation
would diminish on the Earth, while the average
level of morality would increase. In turn, if all people
on the Earth were atheists, then the science and
technology would bloom, while the morality would
fell down. The main reason is, that when something
undesirable affects believers in God, these typically
state that this is the "God's will" and do NOTHING
to improve their situation. In turn when something
undesirable affects atheists, then they try to determine
what is the reason for this and they fight with it.
So what God should do in order to make the humanity
to stay on the path of morality, but simultaneously people
keep motivations to continue research, progress, and
improvement of their situations. Well, on the present
level of human awareness the only choice is that
a correct balance between the number of people
who believe in God, and the number of atheists, must
be maintained on the Earth. Expressing this in
other words, if someone puts himself into the position
of God (means speaking scientifically - if someone
would "simulate the situation of God") then he would
discover easily that God to the same degree is
interested in a correctly balanced propagation
amongst present people both the "atheism" as
well as the "belief in God". In turn the best evidence
for this interest of God in a balanced propagation
of both, atheism and the belief in God, is the so-called
free will of people, and also the so-called
canon of ambiguity which God displays
in everything that He does. The "free will" which
God gave to all people causes that each one of
us has the right to interpret everything
on any way that he or she wishes. In turn the
"canon of ambiguity", which is embedded into
every action of God, depends on such doing
everything God decides to do, that every
person can interpret later this God's action
according to his or her own view of the world
and according to his or her personal philosophy -
means in any way that a given person wishes
to interpret it. (Please notice that descriptions
of the "canon of ambiguity" are provided in
subsection JB7.4 from volume 7 of my
monograph [1/4].)
Unfortunately, the maintenance of the correct
balance on the Earth between the number of
atheists and the number of believers in God,
is immensely difficult. After all, people display
so-called "sheep mentality". Furthermore, on
the Earth works inertia, fashion, tradition, etc.
Therefore, every now and again this healthy
balance becomes disturbed. So what God does
in such cases. Well, he must take various
corrective measures. What these measures are
we already saw in the period of medieval times,
and we also are starting to see it in the present
time. After all, similarly like previously this
happened already once near the end of
antiquity, just recently again the disturbance
of this healthy balance took place.
In the result of this disturbed balance, the
number of atheists grew to the level that it
endangers the moral progress of humanity.
So God again must intervene, and in fact He
already intervenes. But He cannot appear
openly in the sky and start to electrocute atheists
with lightnings. After all this would destroy the
"free will" of people - and thus would force every
atheists to become a believer in God. In the
result another fall down of progress in knowledge
and technology would take place in the future
of the Earth. Therefore God have chosen
another method for restoration of the balance.
It is based on an old finding which is excellently
expressed by the proverb which states that
there are no atheists amongst frightened.
This method represents only a slight modification
of the method that God already used once
on the humanity during medieval times. In
a short run it is going to turn very painful for
individual people. But on a long run it is going
to turn very beneficial for the entire human
civilisation. This web page is going to try to
describe systematically and scientifically what
this method is all about. Furthermore, this page
shares with the reader my answers to questions
that are stated at the beginning of this item.
Part #B:
Goals which
God
posted for Himself for accomplishing:
#B1.
The "free will" - why God gave it to people:
If we consider this carefully, people have
access to several indicators which allow them
to deduce the intentions of God. One amongst
these indicators is the so-called "free will"
which people received from God. (Notice
that it is from this "free will" that the name
of this web page
will.htm
originates.) The "free will" is the right
to form and to adhere to any opinion on
every subject and to undertake actions
that are aligned with this opinion.
It is NOT difficult to deduce, that the right to a
"free will" given to people by God represents
simultaneously a very serious limitation which
tightens methods of God's action. After all, in
order to NOT break in people this "free will",
God is forced to act in a strictly defined manner.
It means, that whatever God does, He is forced
to do this in such a manner that every person
is later able to interpret this on his or her own
manner - means as he or she only wishes.
(This principle of highly ambiguous acting of
God is called the "canon of ambiguity" and it
is discussed more comprehensively in item
#C2 of this web page.) For example, if a view
that is spreading amongst people is NOT in a
long-term interest of God, then because of the
giving to people this "free will" God cannot
appear in clouds and hit with lightning bolts
all people who disseminate this inconvenient
view. After all, if God appear to people and
act in such a manner, then all people would
be so scared that they would loose the "free
will" and would start to do exactly what God
ordered them to do. Of course, there must
exist a very important reason for which God
for the good of His own interests decided to
impose on Himself these additional limitations
in order to give a "free will" to people. If one
analyses the matter thoroughly, this reason
can be deduced. Namely, people received
this right to "free will" from
God,
because God needs the inspirational variety
of human opinions on every subject. In turn
this variety of different opinions can be
important for God only in case when the
most important goal of God is to increase His
knowledge.
#B2.
The intellectual development of the universe - means one amongst the most important goals which
God
tries to accomplish through the creation of mankind:
Our simulation of intentions of God carried
out in previous item #B1 allows to establish
that "the most important goal of God is to
increase His knowledge", and thus to
develop intellectually the intelligent universe.
What even more interesting, this goal explains
also exactly what God created the physical
world and man. After all, if God alone tries
to increase His knowledge about the universe,
then in His lonely search for knowledge He
would overlook a huge number of interesting
aspects. This is because with knowledge is
like with discussion on any topic. Means
when we alone consider any topic, then
it looks much poorer than when this topic
is discussed constructively with other people.
So if we consider the existence of man from the
point of view of the intellectual development of
the universe being the most vital goal of God,
then man turns out to be a kind of "God's technician"
who prepares future objects of research. Of
course, this role of man in plans of God places
a series of requirements onto the humanity.
In turn these requirements could be met, God
is forced to direct the development of man in
a strictly defined manner.
The "pursue of knowledge" as the main reason for
creating a man is discussed on a number of totaliztic
web pages. For an example of these pages it is
worth to reach to item #B4 on the web page named
tornado.htm.
Of course, the gathering knowledge is NOT the
only reason for which God created man. A whole
array of almost the same vital reasons for creating
humans by God is listed and explained in item
#C5 from the totaliztic web page
soul_proof.htm.
#B3.
Mankind - means working ants to which
God
entrusted cleaning the complex outlines
of knowledge that are hidden amongst
shadows of possible overlooking:
If we ask ourselves the question "why ancient
people did not build a gun or a glider", then
the most vital reason for this would turn the
lack of awareness that a gun or a glider
can exist. In other words, in order to increase
one's knowledge in any area, one firstly
needs to be aware that such an area of
knowledge does exist at all. So if this
finding we extrapolate to the situation
in which is God, then in order God is
able to continually increase His knowledge,
firstly people must exist which are to realise
to God that such new areas of knowledge
do exist at all - so that God then can increase
His knowledge in these areas.
Let us illustrate the above in more picturesque
manner. If we look with e.g. God's eyes at still
not researched area of unknown, then this
area resembles a "black mass" inside of which
hides a complicated "white skeleton of knowledge".
So in order this "white skeleton of knowledge"
is revealed to eyes of God, there is a need for
a sworn of laborious ants, which are to pounce
onto this "black mass of unknown" and gradually
"eat" all shadows which hide the knowledge.
People are performing for God just such a
role of "sworn of laborious ants" which gradually
reveal a complicated skeleton of knowledge
hidden inside of the black mass of unknown.
#B4.
Which evidence confirms claims of the
philosophy of totalizm
formulated on basis of findings from the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
that "the reason for which
God
created people is easier, safer, faster, and
more accurate getting to know Himself,
as well as the increase of His general
knowledge and level of perfection":
In item #C1 of totaliztic web page
god.htm - with scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions regarding God
it was explained that the getting to know
Himself and the increase of His knowledge,
is the main reason why God created the
physical world and man. Of course, totalizm
developed this tradition, that whatever it states
it always provides also for this the appropriate evidence
and logical deductions which reveal in what
manner and on what basis totalizm reached
a given conclusion. This is so, because only
through presenting evidence in support of
its claims and also presenting the logic
behind its deductions, totalizm is able to
give to its followers the possibility to verify
the truth of its statements. So let us now
carry out the review of logics and evidence
that stands behind the statements of the
philosophy of totalizm that "God created
man in to make better and more efficient
His pursue of knowledge - especially this
part of knowledge which portraits to the
God's own attributes and behaviours".
1.
The totaliztic extension and extrapolation of the
"Theory of Superior Beings" by the Polish genius
named Adam Wiśniewski (pseudo-name "Snerg").
Almost everything that is slightly more complex,
God arranged into kinds of pyramidal structures
and organisations. Examples of these include
the so-called "periodic table of the elements"
(also named the "Mendeleyev Table") - and the
composition of subsequent chemical elements
illustrated by it, or the so-called "Cyclic Table"
described in chapter B from volume 2 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
while briefly discussed in items #B1 to #B4 of
the web page named
propulsion.htm -
and regularities in the development of propulsion
systems that are illustrated by this Cyclic Table.
Various regularities which are embedded into
such pyramidal structures already were noticed,
and utilised, by numerous researchers - including
into this number also a genius researcher of the
Polish origin, named Adam Wiśniewski (which in
his writings used the pseudo-name "Snerg"). Mr
Adam Wiśniewski (1/1/1937 - 23/8/1995)
noticed that there is a high regularity into which
are arranged subsequent levels of God's creatures.
This regularity which he discovered is now called
the "Theory of Superior Beings" (the Polish name
"Teoria Nadistot").
Statements of this theory are already published
in a number of Polish publications - although
(similarly as almost everything that because of
the Polish origin is NOT appreciated by Poles
themselves and thus is NOT promoted by them
in the rest of the world - for details see also items
#I1 to #I6 of the separate web page named
mozajski_uk.htm),
in the western countries this extremely vital theory still
remains largely unknown or ignored. This is pity -
because the genius of this theory and its significance
to the "totaliztic science" require that it is vigorously
promoted throughout the entire world - which
promoting I already joined enthusiastically (e.g. see
this item, totaliztic publications to which this item
refers, and also see item #I6 on the abovementioned web
page named "mozajski_uk.htm"). This genius theory reveals
e.g. that every higher level of existence "nourishes
itself" with products earned by a lower than itself
level of existence. For example, us people have
the opportunity to watch in action on everyday
basis as many as several different levels of existence
that surrounds us. These include: (1) minerals
and chemical elements from which our planet
is composed, (2) vegetation, (3) animals, and
(4) intelligent being - means people. As we also
know, each lower of these levels of existence
is unable to notice with its senses the existence
of the level that is higher than itself. Therefore,
for example, minerals and chemical elements
from the level (1) are unaware of the existence
of vegetation from the level (2), in turn vegetation
from the level (2) is unaware of the existence of
animals from the level (3), etc. But chemical elements
from the level (1) form various compounds and
substances which later are "eaten" by vegetation
from the level (2). In turn this vegetation from the
level (2) forms various complex organic compounds
which subsequently are "eaten" by animals from
the level (3). Etc., etc. So if the above regularity
discovered by the Polish genius Adam Wiśniewski is to
be extrapolated further - as this was done by the
totaliztic science,
then it stems from it that also people from the level
(4) earn something as well - and that this something
is later "eaten" by some even higher level of existence
(which people are unable to notice with their senses).
Of course, this higher level of existence is
God.
In turn the
only product which God is able to allegorically
"eat", is the "knowledge" which people generate
during their lives. Everything else, apart
from the "knowledge", God is able to generate
by Himself - so in order to acquire it He has
NOT needed to create neither people nor the
physical world. In other words, the totaliztic
extension of the "Theory of Superior Beings"
by Polish genius Adam Wiśniewski, in the understanding
of logics represents the so-called "theorem" which
states that "if God does exist, then allegorically He
nourishes Himself with the knowledge
generated by people". Thus, in combination with
the formal proofs that "God does exist", which
already were developed and published by the
totaliztic science,
the genius "Theory of Superior Beings" by Wiśniewski
transforms itself into a formal proving procedure,
that "God created people in order to pursue
knowledge more effectively". Although this
procedure was explained here with the use of
rather simplistic terminology and logical deductions,
still it unambiguously proves the findings
of the philosophy of totalizm and the totaliztic
science discussed here, that the "pursue
of knowledge" was just this major goal for the
accomplishing of which God originally created
people, while currently he continually teaches
and protects them, and also supports, supervises
and controls their fates - for more details see
also the web page named
antichrist.htm.
Because of the immense philosophical importance
of the genius "Theory of Superior Beings by Wiśniewski" -
as presented above, this theory, together with
findings of the new "totaliztic science" which it
proves and which states that "God created people
in order to pursue knowledge more effectively",
are also discussed on a number of totaliztic
publications, e.g. in item #B1 of the web page named
antichrist.htm,
in item #F1 of the web page named
wroclaw_uk.htm,
in item #C2 of the web page named
humanity.htm,
or in subsection A3.2 from volume 1 and subsection
NF5 from volume 12 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
2.
Our knowledge of so-called "relative imperfection"
of God. This "relative imperfection of God"
is explained more comprehensively in item #M1
of the web page
evolution.htm - about the process of evolution.
(e.g. see the quotation from the Biblical Book of
Genesis 18:20-21, in which God openly admits,
that He does NOT know everything). In turn the
fact, that also God continually learns and improves
his methods of action, is additionally confirmed
by deductions and evidence presented in item
#D5 of the totaliztic web page
newzealand_visit.htm.
But because the comprehensive understanding
of this "relative imperfection" of God is also
a prerequisite for understanding and
acceptance of explanations from this web page,
I am going to summarise here briefly what is the
essence of this "relative imperfection" of God.
Let us begin from the primitive concept-word of
"imperfection". This highly imprecise concept
was introduced by people in order to describe
some people and some products of human
activities. As such, it is highly inadequate for
describing the superior being of the universe,
whose knowledge is so immense, that this
being was able to create every atom, every
heavenly body, and every living creature of
the universe. Unfortunately, this is the only
concept-word that we have so far, as people did
NOT develop yet a similar word which would
be appropriate to describe God. Therefore,
in order to describe God I use the modified
term "relative imperfection". This modified
terminology does NOT mean at all that God is imperfect -
in the same way as imperfect can be some
people. It only means that the knowledge of
God still is subjected to improvements as time
elapses. Therefore, if this knowledge is estimated
in comparison (i.e. "relative") to the knowledge
of God, estimated - let's say, after another million
years have elapsed, then it is going to turn out
that the knowledge of God was increased in the
meantime. In other words, this "relative imperfection"
means, that if we compare God to man, or even
to all people taken together, than God is going to
turn out infinitively more "perfect" than people.
But if the same God in the state of His knowledge
from today, we compare to this God in the state
of His knowledge that is to appear after, let's say,
one million of years, then it is going to turn out
that today God is "relatively imperfect". The
consequence of this "relative imperfection" of
God is the need that God continually increases
His knowledge.
3.
A kind of knowledge that God does NOT know yet.
If we try to describe what God already knows, then
our list would be infinitively long, and probably still
would miss various vital items. Even if we describe
only what God knows in addition (and above) to
what is known to all people taken together, still the
knowledge listed e.g. in the Biblical "Job" 38:4-27
would turn out to be a small droplet in a huge
ocean. So in general we could state that
God knows everything
about which He is aware that it can be known.
In other words, "God does NOT know only this
knowledge, about which He still does NOT know
that it can be learned". But in order to learn "what
He still does NOT know", God needs someone to
realise to Him that this something can also be
learned. This function of "hinters what God
still does NOT know" is to be performed by people.
It is just for this purpose that God created people,
so the humans would keep realising to Him what He still
does NOT know. In turn when people hint to God
(usually in an unaware manner - means just by a
"pure coincidence") that He still does NOT know
something, then God finds methods and manners
to learn this. So after certain time elapses God
already begins to know it. Such a process of
hinting to God that something requires learning,
and subsequent learning this by God, is continuous.
In this manner, due to the inspiring functions of
people, God continually increases His knowledge.
4.
The human knowledge about "modelling and simulation".
Another group of confirmations that "God really
created the man to be able to increase His knowledge -
especially the knowledge about Himself", are
findings of human scientists on the subject of
so-called "experimental modelling and simulation".
Namely, if people wants to learn exactly attributes
of an object, then typically they make so-called
"model" of this object, then they "simulate" various
situations to which this real object is (or is going
to be) subjected in the real life. Then people watch
how this "model" behaves in subsequent kinds of
such simulated situations. From the real life we
know jolly well, that "the most difficult is to get to
know oneself". So if we relate the above to God,
then it becomes apparent that God wants to learn
well about Himself, but is aware that getting to know
oneself is extremely difficult. Therefore God created
man as a kind of "model" for Himself - means created
man "on his image and similarity". In turn now He
subjects this "model of Himself" to various simulated
situations, in order to be able to get to know Himself
better.
5.
Statements of the Bible. As this was explained in
the totaliztic web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself,
the Bible is a kind of "autobiography" which God gave
to people so that people could get to know Him better.
In this "autobiography" God indirectly confirms that
in fact the reason for which He created man is knowledge -
especially learning by God about Himself. Verses
in the Bible, in which God confirms this fact,
are Acts 17: 24-25, quote: "The God who
made the world and all things in it, since
He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not
dwell in temples made with hands. Neither
is He served by human hands, as though
He needed anything, since He Himself gives
to all life and breath and all things." Expressing
the essence of the above quotation in other
words, God does NOT need anything material
from people, but otherwise, it is Him who gives
to people everything that humans need. But
because God needed to have a reason for
which He created man, this reason is a
different kind than gaining temples or other
material goods from people. What is this
reason, God indirectly suggests this in another
place of the Bible, namely in "Genesis" 1:27
God states, quote: "So God created human
beings, making them to be like Himself, He
created them male and female." So if we
translate this verse into present scientific
language, it turns out that God created a
"model of Himself" in the form of man. In
turn the only reason for which an intelligent
being creates "models", is to learn the behaviour
of these models in specific situations, and
later deducing from the behaviours of these
models, how behaves the object which is
represented and reflected by these models.
So the model of God in the form of "man"
is to serve God for a better learning mechanisms
that rule over the behaviour of God Himself.
6.
NDE - "Near-Death Experience". In a significant
proportion of so-called "Near-Death Experience", people
who went through the clinical death describe their meeting
and discussion with God - Who after the death shows
Himself usually in the form of a beam of light. In this
first talk to a dying person God almost always stresses
the importance and significance of learning and accumulating
knowledge. Reports which reveal this significance which
God places on knowledge, are contained in practically
every book that describes "Near-Death Experience".
Thus from these reports clearly stems that for God the
increase of knowledge is the most vital reason for which
He created people.
7.
Situations and experiences to which people are subjected.
If one analyses thoroughly what happens to individual
people, then it always turns out that many situations
and experiences to which specific people are subjected,
are NOT fruiting with anything beneficial for them. So
these situations and experiences God probably "simulates",
amongst others, also in order to get to know Himself better.
Examples of these include: mosquitoes and other blood-sucking
creatures, suffering, wars, depriving people the certainty
that God does exist, cheating on people, stupid political
leaders, persecutions, so-called "curse of inventors" the
nature of which is described in items #G1 to #G3 (while
the self-defence against which - in items #H1 to #H3)
of the web page
eco_cars.htm - about pollution free cars,
and in item #K3 of the web page
fe_cell.htm - about telekinetic cells,
and many others. In fact if these experiences do
NOT exist, the humanity still would develop and
increase its knowledge - sometimes even faster
that presently (especially with the existence
of the "curse of inventors", stupid leaders, or
mosquitoes). This is because the majority of
destructive experiences does NOT teach
people anything! (As a perfect example for this
consider "wars" which people carry out from
the beginnings of time and still did NOT learn
anything from them.) It is known that everything
that happens to people God controls with an
"iron hand". So if we consider more thoroughly
these destructive situations and experience, if
God eliminates them completely, then it would
have only beneficial for people consequences.
This in turn means, that such destructive situations
and experience are served to people by God not
for the good of these people, but mainly because
God wants to learn something from them.
* * *
From the practice we know, that if any intelligent
creature puts a lot of attention, work, and
troubles into something, then this creature
has vital reasons for doing this, which (reasons)
can be defined and described. It is known
that in order to create man, to give to people
religions and to teach them to seek knowledge
and to behave morally, to rule intentionally over
the fate of humanity, and finally to justly judge
lives of people, God puts in these a huge amount
of attention, work, and troubles. So it dopes NOT
require a genius to deduce, that God does all
these for some extremely vital reason. The
philosophy of totalizm
determined, that this reason is to "increase
knowledge". Of course, because e.g. the need
to "keep people in the lack of certainty about
the existence of God", as described in item
#F2 from the web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
and also because of several other reasons,
God Himself cannot appear on the sky and
explain to us that the increase of knowledge
is what He is after. Therefore, let us hope,
that the evidence and logical justifications
provided in this item, convinced the reader
that "seeking knowledge" is in fact the true
goal of all efforts of God. As this is going to
be explained in the next item below, the
awareness of this fact is able to transform
completely our lives.
#B5.
The present phase of gathering knowledge by God concerns "experimentation on evilness and consequences of it":
In spite of the complexity of God's intellect,
which allows God to complete billions of
different actions at the same time, still
empirical data indicate that in His efforts
to seek and to gather knowledge God
distinguishes separate periods and stages.
For example, in medieval times, very clear
period can be distinguished in which God
experimented with plagues on humans. In
turn in present times, clearly a period can
be distinguished when God experiments
with uncontrolled use of technical devices
by people. On the other hand, the entire
latest phase of God's experiments on the
Earth, which already lasts several thousand
of years, clearly depends on "experimenting
with evilness and the consequences of it". In
this concentration on carrying out experiments
with a clear subject area and a clear leading
idea, God is NOT different from human scientists.
After all, when human scientists carry out experiments
on any subject, then in order to minimize
influences of uncontrollable factors which differ
from factors just subjected to research, these scientists
also distinguish clear periods and stages of research,
and they also concentrate in each period and stage
on a thorough researching a single factor only.
There is a lot of evidence in support of the fact,
that our civilisation is just in the middle of phase
when God experiments on people with evilness
and with consequences of it. For example, God
indicates this fact even in the
Bible (which is a kind of "autobiography of God"),
letting people know in there that He temporally
gave to Satan the power over the Earth and
over people. This experimental phase is also
confirmed by numerous evil creatures which
God "simulates" on the Earth. (Such evil creatures
are described, amongst others, in chapter JJ
from volume 6 of the second edition of my
monograph [8/2] "Totalizm".)
God's experiments concerning evilness are also
confirmed by the existence and action of a whole
array of experiences and phenomena that are NOT
needed for the development of people, for example
the existence of mosquitoes and wars described in
subsection JF5 of that volume 6 from my
monograph [8/2],
or the existence of so-called "curse of inventors"
described in there in subsections JF3 and JG5.5.
Finally the experiments of God with evilness are
also confirmed by the present system of rewards
and punishments that God uses at people. God
serves these rewards and punishments to people
according to the so-called "method of carrot and
stick" - described in subsection JG5.2 of that
volume 6 from my
monograph [8/2],
and also mentioned in item #D1 of the web page
god.htm - about scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions regarding God.
Namely, in the presently used by God version of
this "method of carrot and stick", God in a clear
way gives evident and immediately identifiable
rewards for immoral actions, while in the visible
and easily identifiable manner God punishes
mainly for moral actions.
Independently from this item, the "experimentation
on evilness and consequences of it" is also
discussed in subsection JF6 from volume 6 of my
monograph [8/2].
#B5.1.
Intentional and repetitive subjecting people to painful and unpleasant experiences has
also another goal - namely grooming "hardened in fire" future companions of God:
There is a proverb in English stating "spare
the rod and spoil the child". This proverb
represents the translation into present language
of the method of God's acting which in the
Biblical
Book of Proverbs 13:24 God Himself expressed
with the words - quote (from NIV): "He who
spares the rod hates his son, but he who
loves him is careful to discipline him."
Therefore the present phase of gathering
knowledge by God with the use of "experimentation
on evilness and consequences of it" has also another,
equally important goal. Namely, God uses it
also as a method of "grooming" people into
righteous, hardened in fire, and reliable future
companions, through shaping in them desirable
attributes of character with intentional and repetitive
subjecting every person to various unpleasant
and painful experiences. The illustrative explanation
why it is necessary to subject people to such
a "hardening of character", is provided in item
#A3 from the totaliztic web page
god_proof.htm.
Notice that the method of "hardening character
of people" implemented by God through intentional
and repetitive subjecting each person to various
painful and unpleasant experiences, is also
described in item #K2 from the totaliztic web page
soul_proof.htm - about scientific evidence for the existence of souls.
The Bible puts a significant emphasis on the
primary educational principle that the "character
of people should be shaped like we harden steel".
This principle is repeated in the Bible in many
places. For example, apart from the verse quoted
before, in the Biblical "Book of Proverbs" it is also
repeated e.g. in verses 19:18 (quote: "Discipline
your children while they are young enough to
learn. If you don't, you are helping them destroy
themselves."), 22:15 (quote: "Children just
naturally do silly, careless things, but a good
spanking will teach them how to behave."),
23:13 (quote: "Don't hesitate to discipline a child.
A good spanking won't kill him. As a matter
of fact, it may save his life."), or 29:17
(quote: "Discipline your son and you can
always be proud of him. He will never give
you reason to be ashamed"). It is also
repeated in the book "Ecclesiasticus, or
the Wisdom of Sirach" (note - do NOT
confuse it with the different book "Koheleth
or Ecclesiastes"), verse 30:1, quote
from the New Jerusalem Bible: "Whoever
loves his son will beat him frequently so that
in after years the son may be his comfort.").
This principle proven its correctness during
centuries of applying it. Unfortunately, some
dark forces started recently to undermine the
competence of God in the educational principle
which God recommends in His Bible and which
is discussed here. Even more strangely, various
humans, and sometimes also some parents, in
their blindness started lately openly persecute
this principle and make it illegal in the light of
human law. In this way they create on purpose
the situation, that human laws go exactly against God's laws,
and that these people who act accordingly to
God's laws are severely punished by human laws.
For example, in New Zealand the parliament
introduced so-called "anti-smacking
law" which declares a criminal every parent
which gives a smack his or her child. What
is the most strange, that teaching parents by
the government how they should bring up
their children, takes a new dimension in the
light of a television programme entitled "60 minutes"
broadcasted in channel 3 of television New
Zealand, on Monday, 20 July 2009, at 7:30 pm
till 8:30 pm. According to this program, State
Agencies from New Zealand which supposed
to care for orphans and children taken from
their parents, were accused of the largest in
the history of this country abuse of children.
The program informed, that at the time it was
filmed already around 5000 of former children
from the State Care Institutions started the court
proceedings regarding the matter of their former
abuse, while the total number of children abused
in State Care Institutions can reach even as much
as 50000. Thus it should be at least suprising, that
while NOT preventing the abuse of children in the
institutions managed by the state, the same state
feels competent to instruct parents and to issue
laws which are to punish parents who try to
discipline their children in own homes.
In the result of implementing this "anti-smacking law",
New Zealand started to experience educational problems
and increase of crime of the cosmic proportions.
The matter went so far, that in order to force
the government to invalidate this law, concerned
citizens pushed to a country-wide referendum
on 1 to 20 August 2009, which (the
referendum) asks every citizen the question
"Should a smack as part of good parental
correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?"
Although the cost of this referendum climbed to
around 9 millions of dollars, the government in
advance stated that is NOT going to take any
notice of the outcomes of it and does not
intend to change this law. Yet simultaneously
in almost every newspaper which I took to hand
during the preparations to this referendum, I saw
at least one article which directly or indirectly
tried to convince readers to vote YES (i.e. to
vote in favour of keeping this law imposed on the
society by the parliament and making a criminal
from every parent that serves a smack to his or
her child), or at least convince the readers to NOT
take part in voting at all. Simultaneously I did NOT
meet even a single article which would argue to
vote NO - means to vote against keeping this law
in power any further. An example of the article
which argued to vote YES, was the article entitled
"The Bible has harsh views on rearing a child",
from page B5 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Saturday, July 11, 2009.
Parents which give smacks to their children this
article compares to biblical fundamentalists.
(In order to realise what mental links can be
induced in readers by comparing someone
to biblical fundamentalists, it is enough to
mention here that these ones who are accused
of terrorist attacks and bombing of WTC
typically are called religious fundamentalists.) The
article also suggests indirectly that accusing to be
criminals all people who discipline their children with
smacks would be "a more enlightened way forward".
Further data regarding this intriguing referendum
and regarding the anti-smacking law that it tries
to abolish is provided, amongst others, in articles
"Get cracking on referendum act"
from page A4 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Friday, June 19, 2009, and
"Three out of four think poll waste of money"
from page A4 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Monday, June 29, 2009.
The referendum finished on Thursday,
20 August 2009. The outcomes of it were
published, amongst others, in the article
"You say Change the law, PM says No I want"
from page A1 of newspaper
Weekend - The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Saturday-Sunday, August 22-23,
2009. Overwhelming majority of people, because
87.60% voted NO (means requested to change
the law). Only 11.81% of people voted YES (means
keep the existing anti-smacking law). Turnaout in
this referendum was 54.64% (i.e. voted 1,622,000
New Zealanders) - this means against the law voted
more citizens than the total number of citizens who
took part in the governmental elections which preceded
that referendum. The cost of referendum was NZ$ 8.9
millions - but the government still ignored outcomes
of it and still refused to abolish that widely disapproved
law. In fact, the article entitled "Mother jailed for beating
son with hose" from page A1 of the newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Friday, November 20, 2009, describes
a shocking severity with which after the referendum
parents that tried to discipline their children still were
punished in this democratic country. The article
describes a case of a mother which served into her
son's bottom 15 whacks with a watering hose, because
son was chronically truant from the school. For
this whacking she was jailed for 15 months (means
the New Zealand justice served her one month
of jail for each whack of her son's bottom with
a hose). Several further cases when parents
were punished by courts because they tried to
discipline their rampaging brats, is described
in the article "Latta gives OK to anti-smacking
law" from page A1 of the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Tuesday, December 8, 2009.
For my best knowledge, in other place and time
almost each one amongst these cases would finish
with placing these rampaging brats in a court, not
in sentencing their parents. Also parents of these
cases emphasized in a different article "Parents
hit back over smacking" (from page A13 of the
New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post -
issue dated on Saturday, December 19, 2009),
that they were ignored in this "one-sided report"
and that the report contains glaring errors. Yet
in New Zealand the especially arranged governmental
review announced on the base of these cases that
the anti-smacking law is working as intended and
there is no need to change the law.
In another article "It's okay to give
light smacks, says PM" from page A1 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue also dated on Tuesday, December 8, 2009,
this announcement of outcomes of the review
was declared by the anti-law campaigners as
the "government-funded sales pitch". The need
for introducing the anti-smacking law, politicians
of New Zealand most frequently justify by the
supposed need to protect children from abuse
by adults. But as this was revealed by outcomes
of research published in the article "Outcry
fails to reduce child abuse deaths" from page
A7 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, December 10, 2009,
statistics of numbers of deaths of children caused
by abuse by adults remain after the introduction of
anti-smacking law the same as before this introduction.
Thus, the statistics indicate, that the law does
NOT prevent children against deaths from abusive
adults. In turn the political meaning of this law, presented
in the note "If I see good parents getting criminalised
for lightly smacking their children..." from page A9 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, also
can induce a lot of reflections.
More information about grooming in people the
desirable attributes of character in the "hard way"
is provided in subsections D2 and D1 from volume 2 of my
monograph [8/2] entitled "Totalizm".
In turn item #G1 from final parts of this web page
explains "why" these parents who fail to discipline
their children with the proverbial "rod", risks that
their children die at a young age. I would recommend
to have a look at arguments and evidence presented
in that item. After all, in matters which may influence
the life or death of ones that we love, it is worth to
learn the so-called "second opinion" - in this case
developed with methods of the "totaliztic science"
which researches the reality around us from "a priori"
approach that is exactly opposite to the official
"a posteriori" approach to research used by the
so-far monopolistic, old so-called "atheistic
orthodox science". It is also worth to make up
our own mind, as to following of which findings
from both these sciences, is more safe for
us and for these ones whom we love.
#B6.
From thoughtless servants, into aware partners of God:
Motto:
"If you learned
totalizm
thoroughly, then you should stop
think of yourself as a 'servant and
slave of God', but start to consider
yourself to be a 'partner of God in
His searches for knowledge'."
Very meaningful is the content of quotation
provided in 3 from the previous item #B4 of
this web page. This Biblical quotation from
Acts 17: 24-25 states that "The God who
made the world and all things in it, since
He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not
dwell in temples made with hands. Neither
is He served by human hands, as though
He needed anything, since He Himself gives
to all life and breath and all things." In other
words, God does NOT want that people
are to what they are persuaded by present
religions - namely "thoughtless servants of
people who claim to act in the name of God".
God actually wants that people become aware
partners and associates of God in the process
of "gathering knowledge". Amongst others,
this is also why God did NOT stated in the
Bible any explaination why He created people.
He wants that people get the idea all by
themselves and all by themselves begin
voluntarily such a "gathering of knowledge".
After all, if God explained this clearly and openly
in the Bible and thus enforced this in people
with the use of religions which He created,
then the "search for knowledge" would also
become another manifestation amongst numerous
ways of thoughtless services to God. However,
the thoughtless serving and slavery is unable
to generate some kinds of knowledge. (For
example, someone who considers himself
or herself to be a servant and a slave of God
never would be able to formulate the
philosophy of totalizm
nor the theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.)
Therefore God wants that people which believe
in Him went now into a next (higher) phase of
their existence, when from a thoughtless servants
and slaves of God they transform into aware
partners and associates in gathering knowledge
for the good of the entire intelligent universe.
Totalizm is just a philosophy which opens for
people the possibility to carry out this freeing
transformation.
In other words, totalizm tries to explain to us that
just right now a time has started when we people
have the opportunity to get through an extremely
vital "transformation of awareness" and become
kinds of "partners" of God. Means, we do NOT
need to remain any further His thoughtless servants,
who are just to obey His will and to "recite" countless
rosaries in His adoration. We can become now
aware partners and associates of God in the
mutual effort of ourselves and God to seek and
gather knowledge. In turn as such "partners",
we begin to mutually influence each other,
and mutually shape our common future. Thus,
after completing the "transformation of awareness"
described here, NOT only God still shapes our
future, but also us people begin the partnership
in shaping the future of God. However, in order
to be able to fulfil better our function as "partners
of God", it is required that we people begin to
be aware of our true function and role as such
partners of God. In turn the first step towards
this direction is the voluntary learning of the
philosophy of totalizm,
and - if we have such capabilities and intellectual
inclinations, also learning a bit more difficult
than totalizm
the theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
These new disciplines of knowledge allow us
that the to-date belief in God we replace
in our awareness with the thorough knowledge
of God. I hope that by formulating these
descriptions here I added my contribution towards
effective growth of such awareness in all of us.
Practically our transformation from servants into
partners of God, depends on shaking out our
prejudices to-date, on change in our manner
of thinking, and on adopting the intellectual
activeness. After all, in order to become a
"partner of God" in the process of increase
of knowledge, we are NOT allowed to ignore
or leave-out anything in our considerations -
because it could offend someone, nor we are
allowed to take anything just "on faith" - as
so-far it was done by religious people. Thus,
although findings of the
philosophy of totalizm and the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
make us sure that God does exist and sure
that it is God that stands behind everything
that happens around us, still we have a duty to
think logically and to seek knowledge without
any prejudices nor hindering - means with
use of the same principles and methods that
so-far were utilised mainly by so-called "atheistic
scientists". In other words, we need to begin the
active search for knowledge, become satisfied
NOT only by knowing "who" (i.e. God), but also
seek the knowledge "how", "why", "when", etc.
We need to consider every option i possibility,
find answers to every question, and compare
each reply we have with the reality that surrounds
us - in order to determine the extend to which
this reply is true. For example, religious people
NEVER would have the courage to seek answer
to the question "are Satan and devils just negative
poles of God's personality which balance His
positive attributes, in the same way as a 'minus'
is the pole of every battery which balances a
'plus' of this battery?" After all, religious people
would feel fear, prejudice, and hinder against
honest asking of this type of questions. On the
other hand, if one wants to get to know God
and to become His aware partner in seeking the
knowledge, then one needs to have the courage
to ask such questions with good intentions, while
after getting answer to them - also the courage
to compare this answer with the reality that
surrounds us.
Probably I do NOT need to explain here consequences
of someone volunteering for carrying out in himself
or herself this "transformation of awareness" inspired
in people by findings of the
philosophy of totalizm
(i.e. the transformation from thoughtless "servants"
into aware "partners" of God). After all, if one places
himself or herself in the position of God, then it
becomes absolutely certain that it is impossible to
treat the same an aware partner, as one treats a
thoughtless servant. I should mention here, that
since the time when in my awareness I voluntarily
went through this transformation, then immediately
I started to feel a different treatment from God.
#B7.
Whether researchers of God commit blasphemy:
As we know, some religious people rush to
accuse of blasphemy of everyone who
researches or disseminates truths regarding
God - if these truths even slightly differ from
dogmas of their religion. These types of
accusations were a major occupation of
medieval Inquisition. They were also a kind
of scarecrow which was used by priests of
practically all religions. As this is documented
in the Biblical Evangel of St. Matthew, 26:65,
even Jesus Himself was accused of blasphemy
by Jewish priests and condemned to death.
Of course, in the entire history of the humanity
no-one has existed that would be more far from
intensions of blasphemy than Jesus Himself.
For this reason, it is worth to realise, that
researching God, and also investigating and
disseminating truths regarding God, never is
a blasphemy, nor ever can become a blasphemy.
After all, the very nature of researching and
seeking truths is such, that the researcher
must ask questions which no-one asked before
for some reasons. In turn, just asking questions
which earlier were not articulated, nor finding
answers for these questions, cannot become
a blasphemy - no matter what these questions
try to establish. (What really represents a
blasphemy, it is defined in the Bible quite well -
e.g. see Leviticus 24:15, quote:
"Anyone who
curses God, must suffer the consequences ...".)
If we analyse the world around us, then we can
discover that God intentionally motivates and
inspires us to ask difficult questions about Him.
After all, if God does NOT want us to ask such
questions and seek answers to them, then He
would create our world and our history in a
completely different manner. Thus, e.g. the
fact that Jesus was born from the Virgin Mary,
instead of e.g. being lowered down from the
heaven in thunders and lightings, means that
God wants us to research the matter of virgin
birth and the ability to initiate life remotely by God.
In turn e.g. the fact that in the Bible the age of
the universe is defined by God at just around
6000 years, while the same God so created the
fossils of dinosaurs, geological layers, and galaxies,
that contradictory to His Bible they suggest the
age of the universe amounting to around 14
billion years - for details see item #A2 from
the totaliztic web page
evolution.htm,
in reality also means that God wants to inspire us
to ask questions regarding the truth of claims of
the Bible and the true age of the universe. Similarly,
claiming in all religions of the world - as this is
explained in item #C6 from the totaliztic web page
prawda_uk.htm,
that it was God who created the universe, but
simultaneously creating the universe by the same
God is such a manner that it displays evidence
which supposedly suggests that the universe
originates from the so-called "big bang", also
clearly is intended by God to induce searches
for truth in humans and to inspire humans to
discuss this matter - see item #E1 further on
this web page. Etc., etc. In other words,
both, the Bible and the products of a huge
number of God's actions, continually try to
reassure us that these ones who research
God and seek truths about God, do exactly what
God wants that people do. In turn researching
according to intentions of God, never can become
a blasphemy - no matter what questions are
formulated for working theses of this research.
After all, questions on the subject of God
one asks only in the name of love to God and
to own creator - since if we love someone much,
then we want to know everything about him.
On the other hand, a blasphemy commits
only a person that feels something completely
opposite than love.
Part #C:
Manners and methods with the use of which
God
tries to accomplish His goals:
#C1.
The historic review of manners that God utilises for controlling over actions and views of people:
According to explanations provided on
a separate web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself,
in history of the humanity to-date God
tried in action two different groups of methods
of governing over the people. Each of these
two methods of governing people by God
is described in a separate part of the Bible,
i.e. the first in described in the "Old Testament",
while the second one in the "New Testament".
In the first amongst these two groups of methods
God in person tried to directly induce the moral,
technical, and scientific progress of humanity
through projecting Himself into temporary created
human-like bodies which simulated His presence
amongst people. Because God is able to link
His mind simultaneously to any number of such
simulated human-like bodies, this first method of
governing over people boiled down to sending to
the Earth like "gods" (means human-shaped
"ambassadors of God") that lived amongst people
of various tribes and nations. These "gods" taught
local "savages" the basis areas of science and
technology, as well as moral principles of behaviour.
They also initiated wars between nations that
they taught and neighbours of these nations.
Such wars performed several functions. For
example, they provided people with motivations
to learn from these "gods" through demonstrating
to people the direct link between the learned
knowledge and morality and benefits of winning
with given neighbourly nations. They also
reinforced in people understanding to principles
of confrontation and competition, through
realising a simple truth that "the more you learn
and the more you work, the higher chance you
get to wing with your enemies in any confrontation".
In addition, the efficiency of subsequent methods
of action of these "gods" was compared with the
use of such wars and was verified in practice.
Another group of methods of governing used by
God for controlling people was introduced on the
Earth at the moment of appearing of Jesus and
then Christianity. In the
Bible
it is represented by the content of the New
Testament. The characteristic attribute of it is that
God
ceased to openly (i.e. noticeably to people) intervene
into human matters, and started to increasingly
wide implementation of the "canon of ambiguity"
in everything that He does. According to this
canon God ceased to send His ambassadors
(means "gods") to people. In turn when He was
forced to send someone to people, then instead
"gods" He just delegated His "curriers", means
"angels", or simulations of His adversaries (which
He also temporally created, and minds of which
He also fully controlled), means "devils".
Simultaneously God improved and extended His
methods of competition and confrontation between
subsequent groups of people as methods of motivating
the progress. These methods started to be based
NOT only on the competition between subsequent
tribes and nations, but also on ambitions of singular
leaders and rebels, on religion adhered, on access
to resources and to communication routes, etc., etc.
#C2.
The "canon of ambiguity", "free will", and other constraints which at present times limit methods of God:
A path to any goal never is simple. This is
because always on this path various obstacles
appear, which force to walk around them.
As it turns out, various limitations apply also
to even God Himself. The most commonly
known of these limitations include the so-called
"free will", and the so-called "canon of ambiguity".
What even more interesting, both these limitations
God voluntarily imposed on Himself. This in turn
means, that in order to tolerate such limitations,
God needed to have an extremely important
reason for introducing them. This reason is
already explained in item #B1 above.
The "canon of ambiguity" states the following:
in the universe nothing can be fully unambiguous
and deprived sources of all doubts, because
then the people who confront it would be
deprived the right to their own free will and
the right to choose their own views and the
path through the life.
Independently from this item, the "canon of
ambiguity" is also discussed on several other
totaliztic web pages, for example in item #B9
of the web page
god.htm - about scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God,
in item #I1 of the web page
god_proof.htm - about scientific proofs for the existence of God,
in item #B2 of the web page
soul_proof.htm - about scientific proofs for the existence of immortal soul,
and at the beginning of part #F from the web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself.
But the most comprehensive presentation of
this canon is provided in subsection JB7.4
from volume 7 of my
monograph [1/4].
#C3.
Present "people who believe in God" - their contribution to morality with simultaneous
failing to carry out intellectual and technical development of humanity:
Motto:
Present believers only "worship God",
while God in fact requires that people
research Him scientifically and they
pedantically obey laws which God
established and which people are to
learn due to rational researching God.
In item #A2 of this web page, summarised
was an interesting paradox of believers,
namely that the increase of a "blind" belief
in God always leads to the fall-down of
knowledge and technology, although
it maintains the level of morality. The
explanation of this paradox is provided,
amongst others, in item #F2 of the web page
evil.htm,
in item #J3 of the web page named
bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm,
in item #D1 of the web page
ufo.htm,
in item #B3 of the web page named
god_proof.htm,
or in item #A2 of the web page
evolution.htm.
In fact, if the Earth is populated exclusively
by such people blindly believing in God, then
probably until today we would live in caves
or on trees, and we would NOT know yet
what is fire.
The conservative tendencies of people who
blindly and deeply believe in God, have this
consequence that God needs on the
Earth people who cognitively "know" about
His existence, goals, methods of acting, etc.,
not just blindly "believe" in His existence. This
is because the complete knowledge about God
eliminates the action of that "paradox of people
strongly believing in God". People who have
a complete knowledge about God still develop
the science and technology, only that they
do it with a slightly different (better) philosophical
attitude, described by the philosophy of
totalizm.
In addition, people who know about God respect
all moral principles - means do what "atheists"
fail to do. Unfortunately, so-far there is a lack
on the Earth of the sufficient number of such
people who "know" about God. Thus, before
such people appear amongst the humanity in
sufficient numbers, God is forced to maintain
a balance on the Earth, between the number
of people who "blindly" believe in God - thus
who maintain conservatism but promote the
morality, and the number of atheists - who
introduce the scientific and technical progress,
but cause the moral decay.
#C4.
Present "atheists" - their contribution to the development of knowledge
and technology with the simultaneous causing the moral fall down of humanity:
Motto:
Present atheists believe that since the evidence
of punishments for immoral behaviours does
NOT hit people in the eyes, everyone is
excused to act immorally. However, "moral laws"
cause that all immoral behaviours are punished
independently whether these behaviours are
carried out by atheists or by believers in God.
The same web page (indicated above in item
#C3), which explain the "paradox of people
blindly believing in God", reveal also that
"atheists" exert the influence on the humanity
which is completely opposite to influence of
people strongly believing in God. Namely,
atheists promote the development of
knowledge and technology, but simultaneously
they cause moral decay. The present
moral decay of the humanity, which we can
see around, is just a result of too-extensive
spread of atheism. Probably, in order to
stop the further intensification of this moral
fall-down of the humanity, God will be forced
to wipe out the majority of humans - as this
is described in an old Polish prophecy
discussed in "part #H" of the web page named
prophecies.htm.
After that annihilation of the majority of humans,
a situation on the Earth will eventuate, that the
era of a "complete knowledge about God" can
be started. In that approaching era, the
development of science and technology
is to be promoted, as well as high moral
standards are to be maintained in everyday
life of people.
#C5.
The God's "ideal of man" - i.e. morally behaving researcher of the universe which
believes in God but still intensely pursues knowledge and implements technical progress:
Notice that item item still awaits to be translated from Polish into English.
Na bazie dotychczasowych ustaleń co do
faktycznych intencji Boga dosyć klarownie
wyłania sie obraz, jak w oczach Boga
wyglądałby "ideał człowieka". Jak się
okazuje ów ideał człowieka kierowałby
całą swoją energię na gromadzenie wiedzy
i na podnoszenie poziomu technicznego
ludzkości, ale równocześnie w swoim życiu
postępowałby pedantycznie moralnie i
wykazywałby przekonanie i pewność co do istnienia
Boga. Innymi słowy taki idealny człowiek
byłby jakby uosobieniem unaukowionej
moralności i wiary w Boga, wpieranej jednak
zrozumieniem że naczelnym celem
Boga jest właśnie podnoszenie wiedzy,
oraz zaochotniczeniem własnego wkładu
dla szybszego osiągania owego celu Boga.
Stąd na przekór że ów idealny w oczach
Boga człowiek byłby wierzący, wcale nie
zamykałby się przed postępem, wiedzą i
poznaniem - tak jak to czynią dotychczasowi
wierzący, a badałby wszechświat i Boga tak
jak to czynią dotychczasowi ateiści, oraz
usilnie dzwigałby do góry poziom cywilizacyjny
ludzkości. Znaczy, wcale NIE zadowalałby
się znajomością odpowiedzi na pytanie "kto"
(tj. Bóg), ale także poszukiwałby odpowiedzi
na równie ważne pytania "jak", "dlaczego",
"kiedy", "jakie dowody to potwierdzają",
"jaka lekcja z tego dla nas wynika", "jak
to daje się wykorzystać przez ludzkość",
itd., itp.
Na przekór iż z biegiem czasu ludzie wierzący
zapewne będą się zbliżali do tego boskiego
"ideału człowieka", Bóg wcale nie odbierze
ludziom "wolnej woli", ani zapewne nie zaniecha
przestrzegania "kanonu niejednoznaczności".
Dlatego niezależnie od owych "idealnych ludzi",
na świecie nadal będą istnieli "ateiści". Można
więc również wydedukować, jak w oczach Boga
wygląda taki "idealny ateista". Jak łatwo wydedukować,
taki idealny ateista poszukiwałby ateistycznej
wiedzy na temat wszechświata - tak jak to czyni
obecnie, jednak równocześnie uznawałby że
niezależnie od praw fizycznych, działalnością
ludzi rządzą również tzw "prawa moralne".
Innymi słowy, taki "idealny ateista" tym różniłby
się od dzisiejszego ateisty, że we wszystkim co
by czynił też postępowałby pedantycznie moralnie
poprzez świadome przestrzeganie "praw moralnych"
w swoim życiu. Jedyne więc co idealnego ateistę
różniłoby od opisanego wcześniej "idealnego
człowieka", to że nie uznawałby istnienia Boga
zaś "prawa moralne" uważałby za odmianę
praw natury, zamiast jak ludzie wierzący - za prawa
narzucane ludziom do wypełniania przez Boga.
Czytający zapewne zadaje sobie pytanie, czy
istnieje jakiś materiał dowodowy że powyższy
obraz "idealnego człowieka" oraz "idealnego
ateisty" faktycznie jest zgodny z intencjami
Boga. Aczkolwiek wobec działania "kanonu
niejednoznaczności" ogromnie trudno "wypytać"
Boga jakie są jego intencje w tym zakresie,
ciągle istnieją pośrednie potwierdzenia, że
Bóg popiera takie właśnie charakterystyki
ludzi. Jednym z owych pośrednich potwierdzeń
jest "błogosławieństwo twórczości" którym Bóg
obdziela każdego wierzącego który nie zamyka
się przed wiedzą i postępem - tak jak czynią
to typowi ludzie wierzący w Boga,
a moralnie poszukuje, bada, podnosi wiedzę,
oraz moralnie dokonuje postępu w imię wiary
w Boga. Jeśli bowiem przeanalizować życiorysy
wysoce twórczych ludzi, wówczas się okazuje że
niemal wszyscy oni byli otwartymi na wiedzę i
postęp wierzącymi w Boga. Tak nawiasem mówiąc,
to ja zaliczam także i siebie do owej grupy ludzi
silnie wierzących w Boga jednak równocześnie
poszukujących wiedzy o wszechświecie i wspierających
postęp. Osobiście też wierzę, że wszystkie moje
odkrycia i ustalenia opisane na całym szeregu
stron internetowych (np. patrz strona
o mnie (dr inż. Jan Pająk),
czy też strona
humanity.htm - o lepszej ludzkości),
powstały właśnie dzięki poparciu Boga dla postawy
życiowej w której pedantyczna moralność i wiara w
Boga współistnieją w poszukiwaniu prawdy, wiedzy i
w popieraniu postępu.
Part #D:
The situation in which the human civilisation find itself at the present moment:
#D1.
Let us name the situation by what it really is:
Motto:
We can learn morality either a hard way
by empirical experiences, or a pleasant
way through findings of the
moral philosophy of totalizm.
Somehow it happened, that after the second
world war the humanity managed to earn
a relative prosperity. Simultaneously its
scientists deviated onto the path of a blind
atheism. In the result, around 1995 the control
over the Earth took the generation which in
item #I5 from the web page
tapanui.htm
I called the generation of Midases in reverse.
Members of this generation are faithful
followers of the philosophy called
parasitism,
means they are exceptionally immoral,
egoistic, self-centred, greedy, etc. Rules
of that generation unleashed on the Earth
a true hell of immorality, greed, egoism
and brutality which we see now around.
What even worse, the next "me generation" -
which is to take rules over the Earth after
the present "Midases in reverse", displays
even more
parasitic
attributes. This means that in future this present
hell of immorality and injustice is to only escalate.
No wonder that in such a situation when someone
looks carefully around then sees that the situation
does NOT encourage an optimism. The common
deterioration of morality prevails, as well as wars,
crime, cruelty, deaths, greed of wealthy people,
growing poverty of poor, galloping inflation and rise
of prices, atheism, destruction of the environment,
etc., etc. The situation looks as if just arrived times
of the
bibilical
Riders of Apocalypse.
Many people ask why God is not intervening.
But as it turns out God actually does intervene
and gradually causes that the justice is served
with own hands of these immoral people. Only
that the atheistic propaganda of science refuses
to take notice of these discrete activities of God.
Fortunately the
increasingly more people notices it and begins
to reveal it by omitting the channels of official
information. For example, myself I try to report
these restoring morality and justice actions of
God in items #B2 and #I4 of the web page
day26.htm
and in item #B1 of the web page
seismograph.htm.
So if we would give a name to the present times,
then the correct name would be the "period of
punishment and the discrete serving of justice
by God".
#D2.
The common understanding of the present situation of people and the folklore descriptions of this situation:
In 2007 in the Internet a brief email was
disseminated, which in my opinion perfectly
reflects human feelings about the present
situation of the humanity. Below I am repeating
the text of this email in two language versions
(i.e. in English and Polish):
THE PARADOX OF OUR AGE:
We spend more, but we have less, we buy more, but enjoy less.
We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences, but less time.
We have more degrees, but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgement, more experts, but more problems, more medicine, but less wellness.
We drink too much, smoke too much, spend too recklessly, laugh too little, drive too fast, get too angry too quickly, stay up too late, get up too tired, pray too seldom, and watch too much TV.
We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values.
We've learned how to make a living but not a life.
PARADOKS NASZYCH CZASÓW:
Wydajemy więcej, jednak mamy mniej, kupujemy więcej, jednak cieszy nas to mniej.
Mamy większe domy i mniejsze rodziny, więcej wygód, ale mniej czasu.
Mamy więcej dyplomów, ale mniej sensu, więcej wiedzy, jednak mniej właściwej oceny, więcej ekspertów, jednak więcej problemów, więcej lekarstw jednak mniej zdrowia.
Pijemy zbyt wiele, palimy zbyt mocno, wydajemy niedbale, śmiejemy się zbyt rzadko, jeździmy zbyt szybko, wpadamy w gniew zbyt łatwo, zostajemy zbyt długo, wstajemy zbyt zmęczeni, modlimy się zbyt rzadko, ogladamy telewizję zbyt często.
Posiadliśmy wiele na własność, jednak zredukowaliśmy swoje wartości.
Nauczyliśmy się jak utrzymywać się przy życiu, jednak nie wiemy jak żyć.
Part #E:
The matter of God's age:
#E1.
Chaos and primeval beginnings - means the evolutionary power of chaotic movements of the intelligent substance:
Motto:
"The movements of any carrier of intelligence are always sources of new knowledge -
this is why to intelligent people applies the saying that 'travels educate'."
The word "chaos" is a religious name. It
originates from religious mythology of
ancient Greeks. However, differently
sounding words which also represent
the same meaning as "chaos", appear
in practically every other primary religion
of the world. . This appearance of the word
"chaos" in every original religion of the
world, implies that every religion on our
planet describes the same history of the
universe, only that it uses slightly different
wording and explanatory examples. For
example, in Christianity the Bible refers to chaos in Job 10:22 and in Isaiah 24:10. Unfortunately, sceptical atheists explain differently this presence of chaos in every religion - i.e. they explain it as an evidence that every religion was influenced by views of ancient Greeks and simply copied various ideas from Greeks.
All myths of original religions explain the chaos
as the first and the longest out of three periods
of the infinitive history of our universe to-date.
The prolonged period of chaos prevailed in times
when there was no God yet, and when "bodily
representations of God" were not created yet.
Two further periods that followed chaos appeared
only after God self-evolved and replaced the
primeval chaos with orderly creation. Thus, the
second period of primeval times, that appeared
after the chaos, John 1:1-5 marks in the Bible
with words "In the beginning there was the Word, …"
(in the meaning "Word" = information = algorithm
= natural form of program). This period started
when God achieved self-awareness. In turn the
third period in the history of the universe is
explained in Genesis 1:1 and it was initiated
when God proceeded with the creation of orderly
physical universe and humans. This physical
universe was formed from whatever previously
constituted the chaos - as it is explained in
Hebrews 11:3, quote "... the universe was created
by God's Word, so that what can be seen was
made out of what cannot be seen." In other
words: Religions do NOT state that God
created something out of nothing. With the
use of limited vocabulary of antiquity, religions
just try to explain to us that God so organised
an invisible "something" with the appropriate
algorithms (i.e. with the natural forms of program,
or "Word"), that everything that we can see
is formed from "something" that remains invisible
to humans. (On the other hand, for example the present official human science, which vigorously promotes the atheistic "Big Bang" theory, claims an obvious absurd that "the universe supposedly created itself, and that everything in it came to existence from nothing".)
However, the prolonged period of "chaos" does NOT appear in the present scientific model of the universe’s origins. According to the "Big Bang" theory, on which the present official (atheistic) and the only scientific model of the universe is based, there was no such thing as a prolonged chaos. In that theory the matter, space, and time (and thus also the entire universe) formed themselves supposedly from "nothing" due to a powerful "bang" which instantly formed an orderly universe that later only needed to expand. This lack of the period of chaos in the present scientific view of the universe’s history is very meaningful. This is because through a chain of logical deductions it confirms that one out of two above existing models of the universe’s origins is wrong - and all known evidence indicates that the wrong one is this scientific official model. After all, the only verifiable evidence which seems to confirm this Big Bang theory is the so-called "red shift" of light from stars. However, the same red shift can be explained on many different ways, for example as an outcome of the influence of gravity that "condenses the light" of stars from which this light escapes. Also, the Big Bang theory has a lot of details which scientifically seem to disqualify it as the correct one which coincides with the reality - for example it claims that matter and space originated from "nothing", it does NOT explain from what originated the energy the release of which caused the Big Bang - after all it is known that every explosion needs energy the rapid release of which causes this explosion, it fails to explain what was before the Big Bang, and it fails to explain what is beyond the present visible universe. In addition, this solely atheistic model of present science introduces numerous social and political disadvantages and drawbacks, for example it limits the scope of scientific searches, removes God outside of the area of rationality and reasoning, places believers in God on the same foot as madman and misfits of science, and also accuses all scientists who are religious of double standards and makes them responsible in eyes of God for their actions which promote viciously around the world the present aggressive and immoral atheism.
Followers of each above model of the universe’s
origins, i.e. the religious one based on chaos,
and the scientific one which is based on the
"Big Bang" theory, claim that it is their model
which is the correct one - while the other model
is wrong. Unfortunately, none of these claims can be verified directly. After all, such a verification would resemble an effort of climbing at two different but high walls - without any support or ladder, only to discover on the top that these walls never link to each other. Moreover, since both these claims present completely different models of the universe, there is no way of finding the truth e.g. just by comparing them with each other, or by investigating only one of them.
The problem of finding a correct model of universe’s origins could be resolved only if we have a model of religious chaos which for sure is deprived any connection with the mythology of ancient Greeks, and we also have a scientific theory which has no link with the "Big Bang" theory - but which would yield a similar model of the universe as the one provided by religions, and thus which would confirm the existence of the initial prolonged period of chaos in the universe’s history. In such a case we would have a situation which could be compared to two walls erected close to each other and linked together, so thus the researcher who climbs any of them could support himself/herself also on the other wall.
Actually, there is a model of the period of chaos
that originates from a religious mythology, about
which we can be sure that it had NO connection
with the Greek religious mythology. It is contained
in myths of New Zealand Maoris. Until around 1800s
New Zealand Maoris were completely cut off from
the rest of the world, thus definitely had no connection
with religion of Greeks or with religion of any other nation
in the world. In addition, their myths state, that Maoris
were created by God not earlier than just around 800
years ago, but probably even later - and this their
quite recent creation is confirmed by modern
genealogical research. (E.g. on page 6 of the book
[1#E1] by J.M. Mc Ewen, "Rangitana.
A Tribal History" (Reed Methuen, Auckland, 1986,
ISBN 0-474-00030-3) one can find a statement,
quote: "Some hundreds of ...(Maori)... genealogies
in my possession show pretty consistently that this
Whatonga lived about 23 generations prior to the
year 1900." - for more details see item #D3 from
the totaliztic web page named
newzealand_visit.htm.)
In spite of this, myths of Maoris’ original religion
also describe the chaos. To be even more interesting, their mythological description of chaos is probably the most extensive and the most accurate in the world.
The humanity has also a scientific theory which
explains this prolonged period of chaos from the
first stage of the development of the universe.
Interestingly, this theory yields the model of the
universe which is very similar to the religious
model and which also includes the initial period
of chaos. In addition, this theory has no link to
the "Big Bang" theory. But it is confirmed by
incomparably greater wealth of empirical evidence
than the evidence which can be presented by
supporters of the Big Bang theory. It was developed
in 1985 and it represents an alternative model
of the universe, which is based on my
theory of everything
called the
"Concept of Dipolar Gravity"
(the complete version of which is presented
in volumes 4 and 5 of my newest
monograph [1/5]).
This alternative model proves that the gravitational
field has a dipolar character, very similar to the
magnetic field. But because the gravity works
concentrically, the other pole of gravitational
field disappears from our set of dimensions
and appears in a completely different world
called the "counter-world". The counter-world
is filled up with an unique substance called
"counter-matter" - all properties of which are
opposite to properties of matter from our world.
So e.g. the counter-matter always remains
invisible for humans, has no mass, produces
no friction, and is in continuous motion. The
most interesting however, is the property of
counter-matter which represents the opposite
of "stupidity" of the matter from our world.
This property signifies that the counter-matter
must have intelligence - very similar to the
intelligence of hardware from present computers.
Thus, the infinitively long period of chaos of
this counter-matter can randomly develop a
"Word" (understood as a natural form of "information",
"algorithm" and "program"). After all, the
everlasting and continuous chaotic movements
of this counter-matter, makes it similar to that
"monkey" from the theory of probability
(described in the "motto" for next item #E1.1),
which for eternity types chaotic letters
on a keyboard, so that at some stage by
a purely random chance it actually types a nice
poem from these chaotic letters. In this
manner, the entire counter-world filled up
with such intelligent substance constitutes
what religions call "God". Thus, the model
of universe based on the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity is confirming that God does exist,
that this God rules over the entire universe,
that this God created our physical world,
and also that this God self-evolved from the
initial chaos of continuously moving counter-matter.
Actually this model allowed to develop a formal
scientific proof for the existence of God.
Outlines of this proof are presented on the web page named
god_proof.htm.
Incidentally, returning to this "immortal monkey
forever tapping into keyboard of a typewriter"
(i.e. that "monkey" from the "motto" to next item #E1.1),
which monkey, according to the theory of probability,
supposed to eventually tap out a beautiful poem on
its typewriter, this particular monkey provides a
clarification as "how a self-conscious program of
God self-evolved in the intelligent counter-matter".
However, the same monkey is still not able to explain
e.g. the evolution of people. The point is, that a random
evolution of a natural program (which in verse 1:1
from the Biblical "John" is called the "Word" - in
the meaning of "information", "algorithm" and "program")
is infinitely simpler than a random evolution of a living
organism. In order for a randomly juxtapose a natural
"program" (in the Bible called the "Word") it is enough
to align in a right order all its components. However, to
randomly assemble (evolve) a man, it does NOT suffice
to just correctly aligns all of its components, but also is
needed the correct alignment and pre-programming of
mutual cooperation between all these components.
Thus, in such an example of "a monkey with a typewriter",
the human evolution has NO resemblance to a simple
typing a poem on this typewriter (i.e. to the proper
aligning of letters), but it is more similar to e.g. a
random assembly of the working typewriter through
perpetual agitation by this monkey of a box full of
various mechanical parts of a typewriter (i.e. it boils
down to NOT only a proper alignment of the parts,
but also to giving to these parts the required functionality
and such their pre-programming that they collaborate
with each other in the required manner). As it is NOT
difficult to guess, although the
theory of probability can justify as a possibility an
accidental tapping out a poem by an immortal
monkey tapping forever in keys of a typewriter, the
same theory of probability is NO longer able to justify
(without committing a serious error) that it is also
possible to randomly assembly a typewriter
by such a monkey, through, for example, shaking
forever a box which contains, among others, all parts
of that typewriter!!! In other words, it is
possible that the natural program of God randomly
evolved in intelligent counter-matter, but it is absolutely
impossible that the first man randomly evolved in
non-intelligent matter.
The most interesting part of the model of universe
based on the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, is the
evolution of this thinking God from the initial chaos
of continually moving counter-matter. The reason
is that in this particular model, the universe existed
infinitively long as a huge droplet of the liquid
counter-matter displaying properties of the
computer-like hardware, and suspended in the
infinitively large empty space. But for the majority
of the eternity this counter-matter had no program
which would provide it with ability to think and with
self-awareness. Thus, it was like a present computer
hardware deprived of its software (meaning deprived
of what the Bible calls "Word" = information = algorithm
= natural form of program). Only relatively lately in
memory of this liquid computer-like counter-matter
has self-evolved a software component which represents
the thinking and self-aware component of the God’s
Trinity. In turn the driving evolutionary force of this
self-evolution of thinking God was the learning
potential of the primeval "chaos". The Concept
of Dipolar Gravity defines this primeval chaos
as the situation when this invisible for people,
weightless and frictionless counter-matter was
"boiling" randomly, forming an intertwining
tumbleweed of whirls, streams, and tides which
moved aimlessly across the infinitive spaces
of the universe.
In exactly the same way as it is explained by the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity, the self-evolution of
God is also described in the religious mythology
of Maoris. Example of this description can be found in numerous publications which present myths of New Zealand Maoris collected and written down by first European settlers which arrived to New Zealand around 1800s. An example of such a publication is the book [2#E1] by A. W. Reed, "Reed Book of Maori Mythology", Auckland, New Zealand 2004, ISBN 0-7900-0950-1 (see in there pages 3 to 8). According to these Maori legends, the period of primeval chaos of the universe which lasted a half of infinity, can be subdivided into two parts, described by Maoris with words "Po" and "Kore". The Maori word "Po" describes the part of chaos, when the process of evolution of self-aware God (or "Word") was not initiated yet. The word "Po" in Maori language means night, realm of death, darkness. The mythology of New Zealand Maoris assigns to this period of "Po" as many as 12 attributes, which excellently characterised this first period of primeval chaos. Thus, it describes this period "Po" as: (1) the great night which lasted a half of infinity, (2) the long night, (3) the lowest night, (4) the loftiest night, (5) the black night, (6) the intensely black night, (7) the unseen night, (8) the changing night, (9) the untouchable night, (10) the night of narrow passage, (11) the turning night, and (12) the initiating night. The second part of chaos is described by the mythology of Maoris with the word "Kore" - which means the negation of light, feeling, form, matter, but also the realm of potential being. The "Kore" period describes the relatively short stage in the universe’s eternal history, when the thinking and self-aware algorithm ("Word") was already developing from the initial chaos of movements. This period is subdivided in the mythology of Maoris into several stages, which describe how (1) the conception led to (2) increase, this to (3) thought, this to (4) remembrance, this to (5) consciousness, and this to (6) desire. When, in the result
of this evolution, finally come to existence the
"Word" which obtained its own self-awareness,
this "Word" transformed into the Supreme Being
of the universe. This Supreme Being is called
"Io" by Maoris. After this "Io" self-evolved, it took
control over further development of the universe,
consequently creating everything that we see -
including the entire physical world and man.
In the Maori language the pronunciation of
the God's name "Io" sounds very similar to
the fast pronunciation of the name "Jehovah"
under which ancient Israelites used to know
their God (see "Exodus" from the Bible, verse
6:2 stating, quote: "I am Jehovah"). Simultaneously,
this pronunciation is also very similar to the ancient
names of the Chief God from many other native
religions of the world - as an example consider
the old pronunciation of the name Zeus. In
past I have heard from a religious Indian, that
also the name of the Superior God of Hinduism,
currently spelled as "Brahman", in the ancient
language of India was pronounced exactly
the same as the name of old Jewish God spelled
with the "Hebrew Tetragrammaton" YHWH - i.e.
the same God whose name the English Bible
spells as "Jehovah". All present differences
in the spelling of the God's name result from
effects of evolution and translation of alphabets.
After all, e.g. always the same name of Jewish
God YHWH, English Bibles usually spell as "Jehovah",
Polish Bibles as "Jahwe", Italian as "Geova",
Fijan as "Jiova", Danish as "Jehova", Portuguese
as "Jeová"; in turn all these Bibles supposedly
use the same Latin Alphabet. So it looks like
in all religions of the world God introduced
Himself to people with the same name. Only that,
in order to prevent realizing by people that each
one of these religions gave to humans always
exactly the same God, His own name this God
ordered in every religion to be kept secret. But
when it turned out, that people did NOT keep this
secret, then God inspired different spellings of
His name in every existing alphabet - so that
the anonymity of the only God still is maintained
even today. (Notice that commonly unrealised
identity of statements of almost all native religions
of the world is also emerging from examples of
evidence presented in item #C6 of the web page named
prawda_uk.htm,
and in item #D1 of the web page named
newzealand_visit.htm.)
Because of the separation from the rest of the
world, the content of native religious mythology
of the New Zealand Maoris could NOT be influences
by any other religion of the Earth. In spite of that,
the claims of Maori myths display a shocking
identity with statements of many other native
religions of the world, e.g. with religions of
ancient Greeks and Indians, and also with findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Only that, as every other religion in the world, also
the religion of Maoris was formulated according to
principles of operation of the "moral field", described
in item #F1 of the web page named
rok_uk.htm.
After all, this moral field requires, that people earn
everything with their own work and effort. Thus,
"every religion provides only very general
guidelines and well camouflaged confirmations
for truths which someone previously already
earned with a hard work and effort". No
religion is a source of ready-made solutions for
lazy people, for sceptics, or for atheists. The
same is with the religion of Maoris. In order to
give to it such a character of a collection of
"confirmations", but NOT "ready-made solutions",
God formed the religion of Maoris in a special way.
For example, principles of this religion are passed
verbally from a generation to a generation (God
did NOT gave to Maoris the ability to write). Of
course, by being only a spoken religion, subsequent
generations of repeaters massed up many things
in the narration - changing vital orders of things,
e.g. changing the order of Po and Kore - although
the book [3#E1] writes on page 60, quote: "In some
versions {of myths} the Po precedes the Kore, ...",
loosing various components, introducing own
interpretations, etc. Thus, without having a tool
which was able to put into order this verbal
massing up, such as the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
other scientists were unable to understand what actually
this religion is saying. So they only kept repeating
thoughtlessly in their publications legends of Maoris,
but were unable to find any sense in these legends.
In addition, God gave to Maori societies the character
of "castes" - subdividing the entire religion into several
segments and giving them as secrets to separate
social "castes" of Maoris. Thus, after it was written
down by Europeans, the religion remained segmented -
according to borders of these "castes". (For example,
the knowledge about the Supreme Being called "Io"
received only the highest caste of "wise-men" (tohunga)
amongst Maoris. But note that God did exactly the
same with people of ancient Israel. For example, in the
Biblical Book of Exodus, verse 6:3, God states: "I used
to appear to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as God Almighty,
but as respects my name Jehovah I did not make myself
known to them." As it can be seen, God had a principle
that He revealed his name to only selected people.)
However, in spite of all these consequences of
the camouflaging the real content, the religion of
Maoris still provides clear confirmations for practically
all findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
discussed here. For example, the book [3#E1]
by Elsdon Best, entitled "Maori Religion and Mythology"
(Part 1, A.R. Shearer 1976, Wellington, New Zealand),
devotes an entire first chapter to the discussion of
Maori myths of creation. Looking through the content
of this book, one is hit by following sentences that
confirm this shocking agreeability, quote: (Page 57)
"...The earth and sky appeared from chaos, or nothingness -
that is, from the condition known to the Maori as the
Po, usually rendered by us as "night" or "darkness",
but which really implies the unknown." (Page 56)
"...myth showing the origin or growth of matter from
chaos, or nothingness, and the gradual evolution
of light from darkness ". (Page 66) "The Vedic
poets speak of the Power that produced all from
chaos by the power of heat". (Page 63) "... that
the great Io, the Supreme Being, existed prior
to matter of any kind, that he dwelt in space ere
the earth was formed, and that it was he who caused
the earth to come into being", "... then the mighty
Io called upon light to appear, and light dawned
across space". (Page 75) "Io ... the Parent and
Io the Parentless - he who begat no being, but
who caused all things to come into being."
(Page 145) "Io ... was never born, he shall know
not death. He took no wife and had no offspring..."
This precise similarity between the model of chaos
in the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and in descriptions of chaos in Maori mythology, leads to the conclusion that both of them describe correctly the primeval period in the universe’s history. This in turn introduces various extremely vital implications for the science, knowledge, and our civilisation as a whole. For example, it leads to the situation when the scientific theory and folk religious mythology meet each other in matters regarding God. It also formally proves the existence of God. In turn such a proof leads to the possibility of converting the present religions into a new discipline of science which would investigate God scientifically, using the Concept of Dipolar Gravity as a research model and platform. The advantage of replacing present religions by a scientific discipline would be that this would neutralise the divisive character of religions. After all, a scientific discipline cannot divide nations nor initiate wars (we do NOT know any war initiated by a scientific discipline, but we know many wars initiated by religions). Furthermore, forming a scientific discipline which research chaos and God with the use of scientific tools would close the present period of double standards in science and amongst scientists. This is because scientists could openly acknowledge the existence of God and still remain scientists (as opposite to the present situation when some scientists vigorously promote atheism at work - because the promotion of God in present times finishes with the removal from jobs, while on Sundays, or after the retirement, they attend to church and ask God for forgiveness of the social harm they have caused for job and for money).
In turn, science as a whole would cease to cheat
ordinary citizens by claiming that God does NOT
exist and thus that people may disobey moral rules
of behaviour without any consequences to pay for
this disobeying. Thus, the above deductions prove
the importance of primeval chaos as the evolutionary
force which in past caused that the universe evolved
into what we see now. In turn the scientific recognition
of that chaos in present times may also renew the
morality of the entire human race.
The above evolutionary role of primeval chaos and
the significance of its understanding for the humanity,
are also discussed (as well as extended by additional
evidence and logical deductions) in subsection A1.1
from volume 1 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
#E1.1.
Hostile for people consequences of evolutionary power of chaotic interactions released in self-learning computer networks of the future:
Motto:
"Mathematicians claim, that if some immortal monkey chaotically typed in keys of a typewriter for infinitively long period
of time, then with the elapse of time it would randomly type a beautiful poem. On the similar principle the logic tells us,
that if a volume of substances or components with attributes of a not pre-programmed computer hardware is chaotically
interacting with itself for an infinitively long period of time, then with the elapse of time it will generate inside a self-aware
and logically thinking program.
The previous item #E1 revealed, that the prediction
of the theory of probability frequently repeated
by mathematicians from times of my studies and stating
that "an immortal monkey which chaotically hits
a keyboard of a typewriter, with the elapse of time
would randomly type a beautiful poem",
in fact turns out to be the key for understanding
the origins of our physical world and man.
After all, the logical extrapolation of this prediction
to the area that lies on the border of "philosophy"
and "computer sciences" (or more strictly on the
border of "philosophy" and the so-called "software
engineering" from the area of "computer sciences")
leads to a shocking discovery. Namely, it reveals
that if there is a substance or components with
attributes of a not pre-programmed computer -
for example exists a giant droplet of continuously
moving "counter-matter" capable of acquiring
intelligence, then the infinitive interactions of this
substance or components are to release the
evolutionary power of the chaos. In turn that
creative power of evolutionary chaos is to
lead to the self-evolution of a program that
is self-aware and capable of logical thinking.
In exactly such a manner
evolved the Superior Spiritual Being of the
Universe, by religions called
God.
The evolutionary power of chaotic interactions
of such components with attributes of a not pre-programmed
computer, does not limit itself to the causing the
appearance of God. After all, present computers
also display similar attributes as does the counter-matter.
Thus, if people link together a sufficient number
of such computers into a chaotically interacting computer
network, then the above primary conditions of the
chaos from the universe can be recreated in
a network of computers. This in turn mean, that
when such a computer network would meet
specific conditions, then in it could also self-evolve
a program that would be self-aware and logically
thinking. What even more
interesting, such self-aware and logically thinking
program most probably would consider people to
be its rivals (enemies) and could even start a war
with people. The reflection inducing is also, that
the seed of such a self-aware and logically thinking
program can be created completely by an accident
by some computer "whiz" as a form of self-learning
computer virus. In such a situation, what I am writing
here may become a reality much earlier than anyone
is able to predict. Especially that such a self-aware
and logically thinking program could intentionally
hide from people its existence until the time when
it would cease to feel threatened by people's actions.
In turn, during the initial times, when it would still
be forced to act from hiding, it could camouflage
its activities as hidden actions of human "special
services", the activities of which already for a long
time escaped from the control of societies.
Creative artists typically display a perfect intuition
and thus long in advance they can sense whatever
is to come. This is why, since a long time creative
film makers produce films which reveal cataclysms
that could trouble the humanity if in computers
occurred such self-evolution of self-awareness
and the ability to think logically. As examples
of such films consider the thriller entitled "2001:
A Space Odyssey" (1968, production and direction
by Stanley Kubrick), an entire series of films
entitled "Terminator" (started in 1984 with the
film directed by James Cameron, with Arnold
Schwarzenegger, Linda Hamilton, and Michael
Biehn in main roles), the film "I, Robot" (MV, 2004,
with Will Smith and Bridget Moynahan in main
roles) in which the computer called "Viki" constructed
to control robots accomplished self-awareness
and tried to carry out a revolution, the film entitled
"Eagle Eye"
(MVL, 2008, with Shia LaBeouf and Michelle
Monaghan in main roles) in which a self-aware
computer tries to replace the government, or
even consider the rebellion of the computer
called "autopilot" from the American animated film
for children entitled "Wall-E" (from 2008, production of "Pixar
Animation Studios", director Andrew Stanton).
All these films reveal to us one reflection-inducing
fact, namely that if such a self-aware and capable
of logical thinking program self-evolves in computers
that operate in the same world as people do, then the
humanity lands in serious troubles, while the Earth
may even become depopulated by this program.
(Notice that the depopulation of the Earth by something
that people are to bring on themselves, is already
forecasted by an old Polish prophecy described
in "part #H" from the web page named
prophecies.htm.)
The real possibility, that the evolutionary power
of chaos may reveal itself also in computers, adds
a practical meaning to our research on the primeval
chaos described in the previous item #E1. After all,
in present times people create increasingly more
various computer networks, the mutual interactions
of which have the chaotic character. As an example
of just such networks consider the present "internet",
present interactions of microprocessors from the
networks of "hand-phones", or systems created
in several countries of the world under the name
"ubiquitous computing". Therefore, it would be
with benefits to people, if the research of primeval
chaos of the "counter-matter" allowed us to define
precisely what conditions must be fulfilled so that
such a chaotic interactions of computers linked
together in large computer networks could cause
the self-evolution of a self-aware and logically
thinking program. After all, our knowledge
of these conditions could help people to e.g. avoid
situations described by narrations of abovementioned
films. Just on the basis of descriptions provided
above in item #E1, some amongst these conditions
can already be identified. For example, they include
(1) the ability of chaotically interacting computers
to accumulate knowledge and to self-learn. (As it
is revealed to us by the "software engineering",
the construction of self-aware computers is a
natural direction of the development of computers.
So with the elapse of time such self-learning
computers will be constructed and will be linked
together into networks similar to present "internet",
"hand-phones", or systems for "ubiquitous computing".)
Another condition is (2) supplying these computers
into programs which are "resistant to switching off",
means programs which after switching off a given
computer do NOT start everything from the very
beginning, but rather after the computer is switched
on again, they continue a correct work starting
from the point on which they were switched off.
Just such a "resistance to switching off" already
now receives a number of programs, e.g. some
operating systems (including into this number
also several most recent versions of "Windows"
by Microsoft). Of course, there is more similar
conditions to be fulfilled, while the future detailed
research on the primeval chaos is able to identify
and to define them all.
Part #F:
How us people can assit in the restoration of balance and in the reversal of present tendention to destroy:
#F1.
The common understanding of the intentions of God and meeting these intentions a half way:
In order to accomplish goals, which God
set for Himself at the time of creating the
physical world and man, He imposes onto
the people specific requirements, and follows
certain principles when acting towards
humans. Thus, the life of people would
be much happier and more prosperous
if humans learned these requirements
and principles, and voluntarily started
to implement them in all human actions.
Unfortunately, as so-far, people do NOT
want to research them, nor (what even
worse) do NOT want to implement them
in everyday life. The situation becomes
so critical, that at present probably I am
the only scientist on the Earth, who
approvingly researches the
requirements and principles of God.
(I.e. other scientists seem to devote
their lives to only negating
both, the existence of God, as well
as the existence of God's requirements
and God's principles of action.) In the
result of my many-years-long research,
I managed to identify and to learn a lot
of these requirements and principles
followed by God. After learning these, I always
described them in various my publications -
this is probably why other atheistic scientists
always refused to publish my research in
official scientific periodicals. Summary and
examples of my findings concerning
requirements and principles followed by God,
the reader can find, amongst others, in item
#F1 from the totaliztic web page named
rok_uk.htm,
item #F1 of the web page named
morals.htm,
or in volumes 1 and 12 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
which is entirely devoted to learning facts
about God and to learning methods of God's
acting. So in order to understand how really
God acts in order to accomplish faster and
more effectively goals imposed onto the
creation of people, below I am going to
provide an example of one amongst most
commonly utilised principles of God's actions.
#F2.
Everyone who strongly believes in something and acts on the basis
of this belief, receives from God evidence that his belief is true:
Motto:
"Only in the world without
God
would exist events without significance."
In order to stimulate and intensify our thoughts,
searches for knowledge, constructive discussion,
and diversity of opinions, God follows the
principle, that "if someone amongst people
believes in something so strong, that undertakes
actions based on this belief, then always God
supplies this person with evidence, that his or
her beliefs are true". (This principle applied
by God is discussed on a number of totaliztic
web pages, for example in item #F1 of the web page
rok_uk.htm,
items #E1 and #F4.2 of the web page
stawczyk_uk.htm,
item #I1 of the web page
soul_proof.htm,
item #3 of the web page
god_exists.htm,
and also in subsection A16, "Fig. A2",
and "Fig. A3" from volume 1 of my newest
monograph [1/5].)
Of course, people are making errors (or more
strictly - people are purposely created by God
as highly imperfect), and therefore they believe
in a range of things which actually have NO
representations in the permanently existing
physical world. For example, there are
people who strongly believe in: "demons",
"poltergeists", "vampires", "werewolves", "griffins",
"fairies", "UFO", "UFOnauts", "Yeti", "Jessie",
"existence of dinosaurs and their bones", etc., etc.
So if someone strongly believes in something,
that still does NOT exist in the objective reality
that surrounds us, then God simply "simulates"
for him "evidence" about the existence of this
something. (These God's
simulations
are simply objects or creatures permanently
non-existing in a given place or time, which
God creates temporally only to confront with
them a selected person or a chosen group
of people.) In fact, it turns out, that practically
almost everything that present people describe
with the word "unexplained", and also everything
the age of which exceeds beyond the date of
the creation of the Earth and man around
6000 years ago (for evidence - see subsection
A10.1 from volume 1 of
monograph [1/5]),
belongs just to this category of "simulations"
created temporally by God. Of course, with
the existence of such temporally "simulations"
immediately emerges the question "how to
distinguish these from something that exists
permanently"? The reply to this question
provides still another principle followed by
God, which states that "truth always must
be earned laboriously, while untruth always
emerges by itself" - see subsection A16 from
volume 1 of
monograph [1/5].
Thus, according to this principle, the truth is
only whatever someone accomplished in the
result of significant effort and long-term
searches or analyses. In turn, if something
was accomplished easily, then for sure it is
going to be untruth.
Depending on the need, to these temporally
"simulations" God gives the form of (1) various
objects which already exists (such as people,
comets, ships, cars, objects that the humanity
supposed to get to know better, etc.), or the
form of (2) various objects which still do NOT
exist, but soon supposed to appear (e.g. devices
or vehicles which people are yet to develop in
the future). In both these cases such God's
"simulations" are extremely perfect - as this
is explained in subsection P2.16 from volume
14 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
After all, God has thousands of years of experience
in the "simulation" of various objects and creatures.
For example, already ancient Greeks saw stone
and metal colossuses, and entire phantom cities.
In middle ages the sea was filled up with
"ghost-ships" -
such as the famous
"Flying Dutchman".
In turn, to explain the "phantom cities", there were
even developed pseudo-scientific explanations
of the type of phenomenon known as
"fatamorgana".
On the Polish coasts of the Baltic Sea, until present
times selected people can hear sounds of buzzing
from one such "phantom cities", namely from the
punished by God for its immorality, the so-called
"Vineta"
described also in item #H2 of the web page
"tapanui.htm".
The level of perfection of these God's "simulations"
is so high, that for example, if we build machines
or vehicles "simulated" by God, then they would
work exactly as it is demonstrated during these
"simulations". Therefore God's "simulations" of
machines, especially flying vehicles, should
interest us the most. After all, they are always
shown to us for the vital reason and with
an important goal in mind.
The first relatively well documented kind of such
perfectly "simulated" flying vehicles were
"airships" massively simulated by
God at the end of 19th century and at the
beginning of 20th century. They supposed
to inspire people to build flying machines.
Especially lot of them was sighted in New
Zealand. The literature from that times writes
even about "raids of airships on New Zealand".
Another kind of flying vehicles massively simulated
by God, were so called "ghost-rockets".
Their "simulations" took place soon after the Second
World War, mainly in Scandinavia, and mainly
in 1946. God "simulated" these rockets to induce
the interest of people in the development of rockets
and rocket propulsion systems. The present level
of cosmic technologies on the Earth, and also the
present existence of satellites, space stations, and
cheap telecommunication, the humanity owns just
to these manifestations of "ghost-rockets" just after
the war. Currently quite a rich literature exists on
their subject. In internet one can read about them
if in a search machine (e.g. in Google) types the key words
"ghost rockets".
Images in the same search engine allow also to view
old photographs of those "ghost-rockets".
Those "ghost-rockets" displayed a whole range of
extraordinary attributes. For example, in spite that
they had appearance of cylindrical rockets and that
they formed trails of fumes and vapours behind them,
they ascended into the space in a complete silence.
Typically they could NOT be captured on radars -
although sometimes they intentionally show themselves
to radar crews. Also no-one was able to determine
where they are launched, and who shoots them.
Furthermore, after people started vigorous
programmes of building rockets and the development
of rocket propulsion systems, these "ghost-rockets"
ceased to appear. After all, they fulfilled the goal
for which God "simulated" them, so there was no
reason for God to continue their "simulations".
The flying vehicles the massive "simulations" of
which God initiated most recently, are so-called
"UFOs". UFO vehicles appeared after
the "simulations" of "ghost-rockets" ceased completely.
Continuous "simulations" of UFO vehicles most
probably is aimed at inspiring the humanity to
undertake the official building of
"Magnocrafts"
and
"Oscillatory Chambers"
of my invention. Unfortunately, in the meantime
the humanity become so complacent, so sticking
to old technologies, and so submerged into the
highly immoral and destructive
"philosophy of parasitism",
that the building of these extremely vital devices
no-one wants to initiate officially. It appears, that
in order to change the philosophy of people and
to initiate the completion of these vital devices,
God firstly will be forced to depopulate the Earth -
as this is described by an old Polish prophecy
about "kissing the ground when one sees footprints
of another human", discussed in part #H of the
web page named
"prophecies.htm".
Every "simulation" by God of any out of these
flying vehicles, or other devices, always had (and
still has) a strict goal, meaning, and consequences.
As it turns out from my analyses, the "simulation"
of devices which physically do NOT exist yet,
always is a foretell (and also an inspiration and
encouragement) about a not-too-distant appearance
of it on the Earth. In turn the "simulation" of objects
which already do exist, typically is an "omen" that
warns witnesses about something, e.g. about something
that is to appear soon and affect them, about
consequences of their behaviour or destination,
etc. For example, in past such "simulations" of
phantom objects which were already known to
people, e.g. comets, ghost-ships, phantom cities,
etc., always was a warning about something
approaching that was NOT pleasant, e.g. about a plague,
war, catastrophe, loosing way, sinking, flooding,
etc. One interesting incident with a "phantom car"
was told to me by a female colleague from work
in the New Zealand city of Invercargill. She experienced
it in person, thus her story was from the so-called
"first hand". Namely, around 1980 she was returning
from work to home, when on a small "round-about"
(in an empty area) near her home, she saw a
strangely behaving car that looked familiar to her.
It was driving in circles around the round-about.
So she stopped her car next to the round-about,
being afraid that this circulating car is driven by
a drunker who may cause an accident. When that
other car was passing by her, she noted that it is
driven by her friend from Auckland (distant by
over 2000 km from Invercargill). The friend gave
her a long and meaningful look, then he silently
drove into one of streets that run out from that
round-about. My colleague drove straight to her
home, expecting that since her friend come to
Invercargill from Auckland, then when he finishes
his engagements he will ring her. Then she
really received a call, but from Auckland. Someone
informed her, that the friend whom she saw just
shortly earlier, had just a fatal car accident in
Auckland, in which he died.
Thus shockingly, when on 10th November 2010
I saw filmed such a renewed simulation of a
"ghost-rocket", I was sure that also it has
its goal, meaning, and consequences. Because
God does everything for vital reasons, it is absolutely
sure that this return to the "simulation" of "ghost-rockets"
has something extremely vital to signal to us.
After all, this rockets direct a special interest
of people into rockets and rocket propulsion
systems. So similarly like in medieval times
the appearance of a "comet" on the sky meant
the arrival of something especially vital (usually
unpleasant for people), also I am ready to bet,
that this reappearance of a "ghost-rocket" has
something to communicate to us. This something
most surely will be connected with the use of
rockets, or with the development of new kinds
of rocket propulsion systems.
About this newest repetition of the "simulation"
of a "ghost-rocket" I learned from news which
the New Zealand television broadcasted on all
channels in evening on Wednesday, 10th
November 2010. These evening news from all
channels played a short video of that "ghost-rocket"
which was shooting upwards above Pacific near
western coasts of the USA, some 56 kilometres
to west from Los Angeles. ("Los Angeles" means
the "City of Angels". I suspect that the name of
that city also has a significance. After all,
in the Polish language we have a saying that
"nobility obliges" - i.e. "szlachectwo zobowiązuje".
Thus e.g. the earthquake from "Christchurch"
in New Zealand and from "Concepcion" in Chile
probably was caused because their citizens
did NOT live up to the names of their cities -
see item #C4 and 3.7 from item #C5 on the web
page "seismograph.htm".) This "ghost-rocket" from
Los Angeles was also silent, spectacular, huge, it left a giant
trail of fumes and vapour when it climbed upward,
and it was watched and filmed by many Americans.
It was also so giant like rockets that lift huge loads
into the space. But the Ministry of Defence of the
USA initially stated, that probably it was just an
"optical illusion". (Because it was NOT visible on
radars?). It also claimed that for sure none of
American military units launched it.
On the next day after the appearance in television,
the same "ghost-rocket" was described also in
newspaper articles illustrated with photographs.
Examples of such articles include the one entitled
"Video of 'missile' has Pentagon puzzled", from
page B1 of New Zealand newspaper named
"The Dominion Post",
issue dated on Thursday, November 11, 2010;
or other entitled "Pentagon puzzles over mystery
missile shot", from page A15 of newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Thursday, November 11, 2010.
In internet, on web pages of CBS, I found also
a copy of the video of that spectacular rocket -
i.e. the same video which was shown in evening
news on the New Zealand television. On 11th
November 2010 I watched this video at internet addresses
"www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/10/eveningnews/main7042324.shtml"
and
"www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7042326n&tag=related;photovideo".
Only that to make viewers to read also articles which
CBS placed together with this video, the video of that
giant rocket was mixed in there with inserts from other
news, and in addition it kept stopping every now and
again, thus forcing the viewer to "push" it forward -
by repetitive clicking on buttons that run it. (If
any reader knows where a video of this rocket
can be viewed without such "additions" and
"stoppages" - then I would be grateful for letting
me know.)
The fact, that this filmed rocket was actually the
"ghost-rocket" simulated by God, not just a physical
rocket, is also confirmed by the official negation of its
existence by authorities. Already two days after
that incident, the Ministry of Defence of the USA
officially stated, that filmed was a jet, not a rocket.
The official statement in just such a tone was described
in the article "Mystery sky trail from jet, not missile,
says Pentagon", from page B5 of New Zealand newspaper
"The Dominion Post",
issue dated on Friday, November 12, 2010. An
additional confirmation of the phantom nature of
that rocket, was a fast removal of the original video
from internet addresses that I indicated above.
After all, if it really was a jet, or really was a physical
rocket, then no-one would feel offended if this
video could be viewed by general public. But the
video of something, about which authorities claim
that it was a jet, while the majority of viewers see
that it was a rocket, is too-controversial and can
induce people to draw unwanted conclusions.
But addresses at which this video was shown
were left undeleted. Probably too many inks in
internet already referred to these addresses - so
the deletion of also them could induce unnecessary
speculations. Fortunately, in the meantime copies
of that video were published also on several other
pages of mass media. Their list can be obtained
when e.g. in the Google "Images" one types e.g.
key words
"CBS rocket video" -
which reveal web pages with photographs of that
characteristic rocket trail along the background
of orange sky. Thus, e.g. on 14th November 2010,
a copy of that video I still was able to view on the
web pages of television stations such as
"www.dailyvsvidz.com",
"www.aolnews.com",
and several other. Unfortunately, because their
videos were just "copies from copies", not
originals, the received picture was NOT as clear
as on the CBS web pages. It is pity, because it
makes impossible for viewers to reach certainty
about the correctness of their conclusions. In
this manner, the evidence about a modern "ghost-rocket"
experienced the identical fate as previously thousands
of already existing evidence on UFOs. As we can see,
our civilisation again has proven, that it completely
does NOT understand, and does NOT want to
understand, the actions of a superior intelligence
that is NOT prepared to ask our scientists, politician,
or authorities, for permission to carry out its activities
on the Earth - as this is explained more comprehensively
in item #B1 from the totaliztic web page named
"ufo_proof.htm".
In the result of many years of research I learned
methods of
God's
actions sufficiently well to know, that if God "simulates"
something so spectacularly, and then makes sure
that the entire world learns about this simulation,
then the given matter is NOT going to finish just
on that one "simulation". After all, many even much
less spectacular matters, such as the matter of
"immoral destruction of fruits by monopoles for
lifting the princes up" - described e.g. in item
#D5 of the web page named
"fruit.htm",
or the matter of "forcing the moral renewal through
earthquakes and tsunamis" described e.g. in item
#F4 of the web page named
"day26.htm",
always with the elapse of time had serious consequences.
Therefore, I personally believe, that after some time,
probably not too-far into the future, we will hear
something quite surprisingly new on the subject
of rockets. So in order to NOT miss so vital matter,
this item is also summarised in subsection OD2
from volume 13 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
Part #G:
Is the Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest" from the animal kingdom,
promoted by the old "atheistic orthodox science", just a "smoke screen" which
hides the principle of "survival of most moral" discovered in 2012 by the
new "totaliztic science", and thus is God forced to terminate life of almost every
intellect which becomes completely deaf to voice of own conscience?
#G1.
If you fail to discipline your child with a "rod",
most probably the child will die at a young age:
Motto:
"Spare rod and probably you will cause the premature death of your child."
Only in 2012 the new "totaliztic science" discovered,
that in the world created and wisely governed
by highly intelligent God, the life of intelligent
beings (i.e. the so-called "intellects") is ruled
by the extremely right, justly and far-sighted
principle of the "survival of most moral".
This principle could not be discovered earlier
by the old "atheistic orthodox science". After
all, it is excellently hidden from that old orthodox
science by the "smoke screen" in the form of
the Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest"
disseminated throughout the world by that old
science. (However, on the Earth this Darwin's
principle of the "survival of fittest" is ruling only
over the deprived of conscience wild animals,
while over all creatures this principle would rule
only in the world which has NO God - for more
details on this subject see item #B1 from the web page named
changelings.htm.)
This newly discovered principle of the "survival of
most moral" is already confirmed by ever increasing
body of empirical evidence that is gradually identified
and researched by the new "totaliztic science" - which
investigates it from "a priori" approach to research that
is exactly opposite to the official stand of old science.
The surprising for almost everyone example of this
evidence, is the finding of the new "totaliztic science",
that if any child is NOT justly disciplined with a
proverbial "rod" - as
God
commands to us to do in the
Bible that He authorised (inspired),
then with a significant probability this child is deprived
the chance to live until a mature age. (On this web
page, the proverbial "rod" is used as a brief name to
all kinds of "justly served corporal punishments".)
A part of this evidence, which confirms the actual
work in real life of the regularity described by the
abovementioned finding, is already presented in
item #D3 of the different web page named
god_exists.htm.
Other part of this evidence I am going to present below
in item #G4 of this web page. It is worth to review this
evidence, as it confirms illustratively, that
children which do NOT
experience the disciplining with proverbial "rods", do NOT
develop in themselves the cause-effect link between
the voice of their conscience, and punishments (as well as
rewards) served to them by mechanisms of real life.
In turn without an automatic awareness of the existence
and work of this cause-effect link, such children do NOT
learn to consult everything that they do with the voice of their
conscience. In the result, as time elapses they become
deaf to the voice of their conscience. On the other
hand to maintain on the Earth
that principle of the "survival of most moral" and also
for other vital reasons which I am describing in item
#G2 below, God is forced to terminate (highly carefully)
the lives of almost all "intellects" which become deaf
to the voice of their conscience. As the
result, by sparing the rod for justly punishment of
children, in fact these children are exposed to a
significant possibility, that they are to die still at
young age, and will NOT live until their own, and
that of their parents, old age. For this reason, I
recommend to read exactly arguments and evidence
which I am presenting here, then to decide on your
own what you are going to do about this matter.
After all, the ignorance is NOT able to protect
anyone's children from meeting the fate of
many other young people, who must die
prematurely, because their parents (and also
teachers and the entire society) failed to train
in them the skills of listening to the voice of
their conscience.
The problem of premature deaths of youngsters
which have NOT acquired the habit to consult their
actions with the voice of conscience, I identified
only in 2012. At beginning of that year I undertook
analysis of moral factors that decide about someone's
premature death in relatively young age. For the
purpose of that analysis, I prepared a list of such
people whom I knew in person (very well) from
times of my own youth, and about which I know that
all of them died in a relatively young age. It happens
that my turbulent fate familiarised me with many such
persons. After preparing that list, it turned out that
all these people had a number of attributes in common.
The most vital out of these attributes was the fact,
that with their behaviours - which I perfectly well
remembered from years of my youth, they always
kept proving that they never listened to the voice
of their conscience (other their common attributes
are described in item #D3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm).
For example, one amongst them, with which I attended
a school, one day dropped into an idea, that it would
be a lot of fun if he empties the entire ink from
his fountain pen to the pocket of a new, elegant,
snow-white jacket of our female teacher. Because
he carried out this emptying of the fountain pen rapidly,
without a previous announcement and without consulting
it with us, in the middle of a class when the teacher
walked along his sit, I had NO possibility to stop him
or to convince him to abandon this "joke". But I felt
so upset by this, that until today I consider the entire
event to be one amongst worse memories from that
school. As a son of poor parents I understood jolly
well how much sacrifices and money-savings the
teacher needed at that time, in order to buy such
elegant and fashionable jacket. This particular
female teacher was very poor, and always looked
shabby because she could NOT afford nice clothing.
Then on my own eyes I saw how beautiful and elegant
she looked in that jacket. But that my colleague
spoiled her jacket already in the first day after she
wore it (never again I saw her in that jacket - probably
she was forced to throw it out). Similar behaviours
which prove the lack of consultations of actions with
voice of own conscience I noted in all persons known
to me, which later died at a young age. This in turn
allowed me to deduce in analyses at the beginning
of 2012, that these young people who become deaf to
the voice of their conscience, and who in addition
fulfilled some additional criteria (e.g. learned to be
very liked, and thus potentially could exert an immoral
influence onto many other people), God simply eliminates
from life by either making them killed at relatively
young age, or by making them e.g. disabled.
Of course, while explaining here, that God terminates
lives at young age for almost all people who developed
in themselves the deafness to the voice of their
conscience, I am NOT claiming, that for this purpose
God appears to them in clouds and hits them with lightning
after previous informing them with a thunderous voice,
that this is for their deafness to the voice of conscience.
Rather opposite, typically they die in such a manner,
that neither themselves, nor people from their surroundings,
have any idea why and for what such a death affected them.
Afterall, to their deaths also applies the principle of God's
behaviour described in item #C2 from the web page named
tornado.htm
(and briefly indicated in item #C2 from this web page),
which states, that in order to NOT deprive people
of their "free will", everything that God does He always
does it in such a way that it contains in itself a parallel
evidence that indicates at least 3 independent causes
for which it has happened. In other words, the kind of
death which gets these people, is an excellent reflection
of unlimited inventiveness and goal-orientation of God's
actions. Thus, they die either for one amongst many
different forms of suicide (as described in
item #D3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm),
or on one amongst numerously different kinds of
accidents, or on some deadly illness, or in some
cataclysm, or during a war, shootout, etc., etc.
But no matter of what kinds of deaths get these
people, they always are highly educational for other
people and always give a lot of food for thoughts to
everyone who learns details of their fate.
Amongst a wealth of empirical evidence which
I already identified in confirmation of my conclusion
(see item #G4 below), the most food for thought
gave me "epidemic" proportions to which the problem
of premature deaths of youngsters grew recently
in New Zealand. The point is, that for many years
in this previously relatively rich New Zealand, works
a legal ban for disciplining children and teenagers with
a proverbial "rod". (This ban is partially explained
already in item #B5.1 from this web page.) In addition,
a significant proportion of people from that country
unofficially practices atheism. What even worse,
New Zealand is currently ruled by women. These
are women who represent a true "power behind the
throne" and real "invisible rulers" that control men
which pretend that they rule over the country. These
also are women who alone make almost all decisions
regarding upbringing of children and teenagers -
thus introducing many detrimental consequences
in the light of the level of imperfection of women
described in item #B2 from the web page named
antichrist.htm.
In turn, all these factors taken together, create almost ideal
conditions for developing by a significant proportion
of the New Zealand youths a deafness to the voice
of their conscience. Therefore next analyses which
I carried out in my research of that problem, was
the checking whether there is a cause-effect link
between the ban on disciplining children and teenagers
with "rods" by their parents, and the number of suicides
and premature deaths (as well as mental illnesses)
amongst these undisciplined youngsters. In these analyses
my attention was attracted to several facts which I
noted previously. One amongst them was my own
memory of times in young age, when I myself was
justly disciplined with a rod. My youth happen still
in times, when parents justly disciplined their children
with a proverbial "rods" (i.e. when parents still used
"corporal punishment"), as well as some older (from
before the war) teachers in schools also still used
various versions of justly punishments with rods.
From that time I remember very well, that myself
never was upset at anyone, when I was getting
a justly disciplining with a rod for some wrongdoing.
However, I felt extremely anguished if I did something wrong,
but an appropriate punishment was NOT served to me.
Explaining this in other words, on the basis of my own
experiences I know, that children do NOT object a
justly being disciplined with rods (although they do
NOT like being disciplined). But their mentality is
significantly disturbed by the lack of such disciplining
when their conscience is telling them that they
deserve a punishment. (This mental disturbance
of the children's psychology by the lack of punishment,
explains why in the country in which punishing with
rods is banned, so many children suffer mental
illnesses.) We must remember, that small children
from the very beginning listen to their voice of conscience -
as this is excellently revealed by research described
for example in the article [1#G1] entitled
"Sense of right and wrong in place by six months of
age, researchers found", from page A5 of newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Tuesday, May 11, 2010. (In a similar
manner domesticated animals act. Contrary to wild
animals, wise God also equipped them into the organ
of conscience - thus the presence of conscience
differentiates domesticated animals from wild animals.
For example, my cat "Teecee" spectacularly illustrated
its feeling of guilt always when he did something immoral -
e.g. when he stole food from a cat of neighbour.)
Only in the school age or in high-school some amongst
these children learn how to ignore or stifle the voice
of conscience in themselves. A second highly helpful
experience was an old folklore belief that I knew,
that children act and behave like animals - and thus
in order to teach them anything, one needs to "train"
them (similarly like one trains animals). After all, the
"training" of animals depends just on development in
them the cause-effect link between some signal, and
whatever is required from them. Both these experiences
taken together, realised to me that disciplining children
with a rod actually depends on developing in them an
awareness of a direct cause-effect link between whatever
their voice of conscience tells to them, and whatever
happens to them in the real life. Thus, if someone fails to
discipline his or her children with a rod, then with the
elapse of time these children learn to become deaf to
the voice of their conscience. After all, they do NOT see
a need to listen to this voice, if the conscience tells them
one thing, while their parents and the life that they lead
state something completely different. Unfortunately to
these children, apart from their parents exists also God -
for Whom people deaf to the voice of their conscience
become useless. After all, the conscience is
that only organ in people, which fulfils the function of a
direct "hot line" which links minds of these people with
the mind of God. It is with the use of this "hot line" that God
communicates with such people, tells them what they
should do and what they should NOT do, inspires their
searches, etc. - as all these functions of conscience
are explained in detail by subsections JA10, JA1.1,
and I5.3 from volumes 6 and 5 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
Therefore if God detects such a useless person which
already at young age learned to be deaf to the voice of
its conscience, then God finds some most appropriate
manner to terminate the life of it (with a lesson to other
people).
For various reasons (e.g. political) Christian religion
tells us, that the major occupation of God is to
"forgive us our sins". Thus, it may become a large
shock for someone to learn, that e.g. God brings
also killing cataclysms, amongst others, to people
who practice the highly immoral
philosophy of parasitism -
as this is explained on the web page named
quake.htm,
or to realise that God kills these intellects (persons)
which become deaf to the voice of their conscience.
Therefore it is desirable to realise also at this point,
that similarly like everything that God does, such
killing is "fair" and highly justly. After all, God does
NOT rush with terminating someone's life, but always
gives to a given person a lot of time and warnings
to change his or her ways. Not without reasons an
old Polish proverb states "God slow, but justly"
(in the original Polish language: "Bóg nierychliwy,
ale sprawiedliwy" - notice that this proverb has
its equivalents in almost every language of the
world, e.g. in English its equivalent states that
"though the mills of God grind slowly, they grind
exceedingly small".) Furthermore, before God
undertakes such a drastic action, He always
firstly makes sure with the aid of appropriately
designed moral tests and exams, that really a
given intellect completely ceased to listen to
the voice of its conscience, and that this particular case
is already hopeless. God gives also to every such
intellect a number of warnings to change its ways,
and only at very end He terminates its life - if
these warnings do NOT bring any effect. For
example, in the
Bible that He authorised (inspired),
God in many places emphasizes and commands
to us, that we should discipline our children with
a rod - for details see item #B5.1 from this web
page. So if someone stubbornly refuses to listen
to these commands of God and decides to NOT
discipline own children with the proverbial rod,
then he or she accepts a full responsibility for
a possible premature death of own child. Also,
in many parts of the Bible God clearly warns,
that He is going to kill these people who do
NOT listen to the voice of own conscience (thus
that He will terminate lives of some amongst the
children which parents fail to discipline with a
rod to teach them listening to the voice of their
conscience). Only that the Bible was written
around 2000 years ago - when the humanity
had NO yet as clear and unambiguous vocabulary
as today. So in order to understand these God's
warnings, we firstly need to analyse them thoroughly
and to translate them into a present language.
So let us do this together (the reader and myself)
on two examples. In the Biblical "Book of Ezekiel",
verse 33:18, God states, quote: "When a righteous
man stops doing good and starts doing evil, he will
die for it." Although that verse does NOT use
a word "conscience", the word "righteous"
perfectly replaces it. After all, in order someone
is "righteous" this someone must listen to the
voice of his "conscience". Other example which,
this time more diplomatically, states exactly the
same, is provided in the inter-testamental book
"Ecclesiasticus, or the Wisdom of Sirach" from
the Bible (do not confuse it with the Biblical book
"Koheleth or Ecclesiastes"), verse 30:1, quote:
"A man who loves his son will beat him frequently
so that in after years the son may be his comfort"
(this is NOT the exact translation of this verse, but
it is the best translation which I managed to find, as
English Bibles reluctantly publish this particular book).
Because of many-centuries-long telling us by Church,
that "God forgives our sins", most people would
understand this verse as if in the present precise
language it would state something along the line
that "if you love your son, then you better discipline
him frequently with a rod, so that he grows up
into a decent man which is going to respect
you and support you at your old age - because
undisciplined children grew up into baddies
who with an elapse of time become only a
trouble to their parents". However, in fact this
verse should be understood as a diplomatic
and multilevel warning of God, stating that
"if you love your son, then with a rod teach
him to listen to the voice of his conscience,
because otherwise I will terminate his life and
at your old age you will have NO son to comfort you".
#G2.
Why God typically kills the majority of intellects which become deaf to the voice of their conscience:
Motto:
"God always is right, only that His commandments frequently are misunderstod, and sometimes even intentionally twisted."
In order to consequently implement on the Earth
the principle of the "survival of most moral", God
carries out a massive program of termination of
lives for the most immoral intellects. For example,
with the truly "iron hand" God kills almost
every intellect which become deaf to the voice
of own conscience - to this quite shocking
conclusion arrived the new "totaliztic science"
(i.e. science described, amongst others, in item
#B5 of this web page, as well as in item #C1 of the web page
telekinetics.htm)
after extensive analyses of a number of cases
of premature deaths of youngsters, and also
of a number of cases of the "elimination" of
entire so-called "group intellects", means e.g.
entire institutions. (What are these "group
intellects", it is explained in more details in
item #E2 of the web page named
totalizm.htm.
God eliminates these group intellects NOT through
killing them - like individual people, but through
their bankrupting, dissolving, replacing with new
intellects established on their place, absorbing
by other group intellects, etc.) This items is to
complement the above conclusion of the "totaliztic
science" with explanations "why God does just this".
In turn the explanation "what evidence confirms
the fact of just such termination of lives for intellects
deaf to the voice of their conscience" and "how
to defend ourselves and our close ones from
sharing the doomed fate of just such intellects
deaf to the voice of their conscience" was provided
in further items #G4 and #G6 from this web page.
(After all, providing replies to such vital questions
is already a long tradition of the new "totaliztic science".)
The providing of answer "why" God eliminates
almost all intellects which stopped to listen to the voice
of their conscience, results directly from the goal
for which God created people. This is because people
were created for the "pursuing of knowledge" - as this
briefly is explained in items #B2 to #B4 of this web
page, while in more details is this goal is explained
in item #B1 from the web page named
antichrist.htm.
Unfortunately, in order people could effectively
carry out such a pursuing of knowledge, they must
fulfil specific moral requirements described, amongst
others, in item #B3 of the web page named
antichrist.htm.
One amongst these moral requirements is, that people
must listen to the voice of their conscience. Thus
people who stop listening to the voice of their conscience
cease to be useful for god and become "expendable".
In turn the only thing to which they still are useful, is to
"die in some manner which is to have an educational
value for other people". Therefore such individuals
are just dying usually in a spectacular manner which
later gives a lot to thing about to people who used to
know them.
#G3.
"Why" and "how" the reader should reassure himself or herself, that in fact
intellects deaf to the voice of their conscience die much prematurely:
Motto:
"In order you could heal someone, you firstly need to learn what causes his illness."
In order to better understand further presentations
from this "part #G", let us make a temporary assumption,
that we already learned all evidence which indicates
item #G4 below on this web page, and that this evidence
reassured us in the belief, that the finding of the
new "totaliztic science" stating that always "survive
the most moral intellects" it an absolute truth - thus
this finding replaces the old and erroneous Darwin's
principle of the "survival of fittest" (about which it turns
out that it applies only to wild animals). In turn
being true, this principle of the "survival of most moral",
which applies to all intellects, must be very difficult for
proving and for confirming. After all, in order to not
make the lying on our backs to be the most moral
behaviour in the world, wise God caused that learning
truths, and that becoming certain that a given truth is
really true, must require putting into this a lot of effort
and work - as this is emphasized in several places of
this web page (e.g. see item #G6 below). In turn, for
a truth to be difficult for proving and requiring the
contribution of significant effort and work in gaining
the assurance that it is true, the empirical evidence
which confirms this truth must be well hidden and
initially invisible for the searching people. Only then
proving, that the newly discovered principle of the
"survival of most moral intellects" is true, will require
putting into this the required work and effort. In other
words, although in
the vital interest of God lies that people learn and obey
moral principles which God established, however
for many superior reasons God is forced to also intentionally
hide from people the content of these principles, and
also require that people learn them themselves after
a personal contributing into this learning the significant
effort and work. Therefore, in spite, that I
would very much like to indicate in this part the exact
places where the reader can fast and easily find absolutely
convincing evidence that the newly discovered principle
of the "survival of most moral" is true as described here,
while the old Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest"
applies only to wild animals, already the sole fact that this
principle is true causes that evidence which confirms
it must be well hidden and that NOT every person will
be allowed by God to see it and to appreciate it. So the
only thing that I can do, and that I did in item #G4 below,
is to indicate to the reader major areas in which he can
seek the evidence that is going to convince him, but I
cannot indicate to him the evidence itself that would
convince him unambiguously and easily.
Another vital attribute of the searches for evidence
described here, is that if someone reassures
himself that the principle of the "survival of most
moral intellect" is true and really is consistently
implemented by God in relationship to people, then
he simultaneously also reassured himself that God
does exist. After all, the principle of the "survival
of most moral" cannot be implemented if there is
NO omnipotent and justice-loving God which governs
over the physical world with the really "iron hand"
(e.g. this principle could NOT work in the "world
without God" described in item #B1 of the web page
changelings.htm).
But unfortunately for people, if everyone could
find easily evidence in confirmation that God
really exists and that He rules over the physical
world with the "iron hand", then many people would
be deprived the so-called "free will". After all, in
order the "free will" could be available to people,
everything that happens in the physical world must
be wrapped into the so-called "canon of ambiguity"
described already in item #C2 from this web page.
In other words, in addition to the fact that the principle
of the "survival of most moral" is true, while as a truth
it must fulfil the requirement that becoming sure about
it must consume people's significant effort and work,
this principle has also the potential, that in case it is
obvious, it would eliminate as well the "free will" in
some people (i.e. in these people which today are
calling themselves "atheists"). This in turn also
imposes onto God additional requirements for
especially good hiding from people the body of
evidence which confirms the actual implementation
of this principle. Summarising both above paragraphs
(i.e. this one and the previous one), while God
with an "iron hand" consistently implements towards
people the newly discovered principle of the "survival
of most moral", simultaneously God has also a number
of very vital reasons to hide well from people the body
of evidence which confirms the truth of this principle,
and to make an impression on people that they are
subjected to the action of that old Darwin's principle
of the "survival of fittest" (which, however, applies
only to wild animals and which ceases to apply even
to domesticated animals). In turn, through just
such intentional hiding of evidence, God makes sure,
that the truth on His subject, and the truth on the subject
of morality, learn only these individuals, who according
to their "free will" have chosen for themselves the
acquiring of this knowledge, and that they contributed
in their choice the required amount of determination,
effort and work.
So in what way God hides from people the evidence
which confirms that intellects are ruled by the principle
of the "survival of most moral", although God simultaneously
implements this principle on people. Well, God uses
for this purpose a number of tools. The most vital amongst
these are (1) "exceptions" described in item #G5
below. Namely, in every case when e.g. a fast killing of
someone that acts immorally would provide too many
people with that unambiguously convincing evidence,
God makes an "exception" from such someone and
does NOT take his life away immediately, but allows
him to live a while longer and to produce the so-called
"intensity of teaching information" (described in item
#G5 below). As the result, all persons which are most
famous (e.g. celebrities, movie stars, heads of countries,
people exceptionally rich, etc.) have a quiet permission
from God to conduct themselves relatively immoral,
but still they are NOT killed fast because of this - because
God placed them onto a list of such His "exceptions".
(In fact God follows a principle, that he does NOT allow
to anyone to become extremely famous, unless this
someone proves to God that he is going to act in an
exceptionally immoral way.) However, such people
is statistically very few. Alter all, in the entire world
God maintains NOT more than around 700 such
"exceptions" - e.g. according to research of the
"Forbes" which traces fates of most famous celebrities,
only around 100 most famous and liked individuals
in the world in fact exerts any influence onto crowds
of other people who copy their behaviour, habits,
clothing, etc. - for details see the article "Women
dominate celeb power-list" from page A3 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Friday, May 18, 2012.
On the other hand, the entire humanity already
exceeded the number 7'000'000'000 (see the
article "We're seven billion - and growing" from
page B1 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post Weekend,
issue dated on Saturday, October 8, 2011. But because
this God's "exceptions" are so famous and thus every
their immoral act is announced over the entire world
by all newspapers, journals, and television news, people
have the impression that unpunished humans really
drown in the ocean of immorality. However, in reality
apart from these several hundred of temporary "exceptions",
the entire huge population of the world is fast killed with
an "iron hand" - if only begins to act immorally (as the
reader can easily check this in his or her own surroundings -
by analysing fates of ordinary people whom knows for
their exceptionally immoral behaviour).
Independently from these "exceptions", God uses
also an array of various other tools and methods
for hiding evidence, that fates of people are governed
by the newly discovered principle of the "survival
of most moral". Another such a tool is (2) the
consistent implementation in the world of
wild animals the Darwin's principle of the "survival
of fittest", and quiet support for the propaganda
of the old "atheistic orthodox science" which
misleadingly tells people that this Darwin's principle
of the "survival of fittest" applies also to people.
In the result, the human wisdom and perceive
are "silenced" by this misleading propaganda of the
atheistic scientists. Still another tool and method
of God in hiding the principle of the "survival of
most moral" boils down to (3) misleading
manner of killing and elimination of most immoral
intellects. This elimination God always carries
out in such a manner, that it looks like an accident,
coincident, convergence of circumstances, etc. -
as in more details explains it item #C2 on the web page
tornado.htm.
A classic example are here wars. After all,
wars are always lost by aggressors,
but always these aggressors firstly look as if they
are to win them, then there is a long period of equal
powers, and only finally by some "coincidence"
aggressors begin to loose wars. Another tool in
hiding truth are (4) various limitations which
forbid revealing truths in present societies.
For example, if someone dies at a young age,
then apart from several friends who knew this
someone in person, no-one else has an idea
as whether this someone was immoral. After all,
the press cannot write truth on the topic of immorality
pof such someone - as this would expose it to
costly court proceedings. Parents the blind love
typically disallows to notice immorality in their
children, while if they can afford an objectivity,
then still the "loyalty" requires that they keep quiet.
Friends and close acquaintances also are to be
silent - after all there is a custom to "not say
anything bad about dead people". Thus, if someone
really wishes to learn a truth about a moral state
of someone whom do NOT know in person, then
he or she must carry our really detective
investigations. In order to give here to the reader
a taste how difficult is establishing a truth from
the content of present newspaper reports, I would
propose here that on the basis of the article
"Boyfriend said victim 'going down tonight' "
from page A8 of newspaper
The Dominion Post
(issue dated on Friday, April 27, 2012), the reader
attempted to establish, whether the 17th years old
New Zealander described in there, listened or not
listened to the voice of own conscience. Still another
tool of God is (5) differentiation of age in which
immoral people are killed. After all, God knows
the future and can kill someone already in cot for
whatever this person is to commit in the adult age -
for details see item #D3 on the web page named
god_exists.htm.
Also God several times shifts back in time every
person - as this is described in item #B4.1 from the web page
immortality.htm.
Thus God may terminate someone's life already at
a child's age for whatever this person in another
course of time did at the adult age. God also has
the ability to choose for the moment of death a
least obvious time in someone's life. Thus if someone
dies at let's say, the age of ever 40 years old, then
instead of investigate whether this someone died
because of the state of his or her morality, we rather
assume that he or she lived to own age and that the
reason for the death is either genetics that he or she
inherited, or illness, or accident, or bad luck, etc.
However, in reality the "premature death" we
should define as "every death that takes place in
the age lower than these 120 years promised to people
by God in the Bible (Genesis, 6:3)". Thus, if
someone dies at the age, let say, 40 years, then
this means, that God judges the total level of his
or her morality as worth only around one-third of
the lifetime to which would be entitled a person
with an ideal morality (i.e. would be entitled a
"God's ideal of person" described in item #C5
of this web page).
Of course, there is much more of similar tools of
God. Thus there is no sense to extend this web page
by describing them all. Already on the basis of these
described here the reader should have a good idea
as to what really is going on around him or her.
In spite of the obstacles described above, truths
always are worth learning. After all, "learning
truths opens for us an access to various benefits
which stem from these truths". For example,
if someone becomes certain that God kills all people
who become deaf to the voice of their conscience,
then he or she undertakes methods of defence
described in item #G6 of this web page and does
everything that is in his or her power to protect
own children from acquiring this deafness. In turn
knowing, that always "survive most moral", one has
an access to a simple recipe for overcoming human
health hazards. Etc., etc. The acquiring of personal
certainty about the truth of regularities described
here allows us to defend ourselves from outcomes
of ignorance in these matters. After all, in order the reader
could effectively defend himself and his close ones
against consequences of the "deafness to the voice
of conscience", firstly one needs acquire the assurance,
that the new "totaliztic science" indicates to him a really
effective method such a self-defence, and also that
undertaking such a defence is "worth of effort".
The point is, as it is to be explained in item #G6 below,
that undertaking such a defence requires a significant
effort and a belief in its necessity. In turn the ones who
do NOT believe in need of such a defence, will NOT
be able to persevere in implementation of it.
In order to acquire the certainty that there is a
need to undertake a defence described in item
#G6 of this web page, the reader must convince
himself or herself, that really "God typically takes
away life from these intellects which do NOT listen
to the voice of their conscience". After all, my
word nor my research do NOT suffice for making
readers certain - after all "certainty" cannot be
"given as a gift" to someone, but every person must
earn it with own effort. (This fact of necessity to
"earn a certainty" I am trying to emphasize,
amongst others, in item #G6 below, and also
in item #B1 from the web page named
soul_proof.htm.)
In other words, in order to acquire the certainty,
readers must by themselves laboriously analyse
cases that document the truth of whatever items
#G1 to #G5 of this web page try to tell them. For
this reason they must break through own resistance
and laziness. They also must to find a truth about
morality of people that they check - in spite that the
human culture typically only prises dead people and
typically avoids mentioning their drawbacks. They
also must become detectives to discover the truth
just on the basis of scarse information which are
to be made available to them. They must also be
able to read whatever is expressed between lines.
Etc., etc.
Let us conclude this item. The goal of it was to
realise to the reader, that if he or she wishes
so, then with the contribution of own effort and
work, he or she can find a sufficient amount of
evidence which conclusively reassures him or
her about the truth of the principle of the "survival
of most moral", which principle rules over fates
of all intellects, and that it is worth to contribute
the required effort and work to acquire this
certainty. After all, this principle is true. Only
that for superior reasons, learning the existence
and work of it must be camouflaged and make
difficult by God Himself. After all,
the humanity entered at
present the epoch in the history, in which learning
specific truths, and experiencing benefits that
stem from these truths, is opened only for those
people and communities, which being aware of
their "free will" firstly voluntarily choose by themselves,
then decisively prove, that they stand on that side
for which such truths and benefits can be opened.
Areas in which readers should seek for themselves
such evidence are indicated in next item #G4 below.
Unfortunately, because for these superior reasons,
God was forced to hide well from the majority of people
the entire that body of evidence, on the Earth are
carried out noise propaganda campaigns, which
tell people that supposedly ones whom act immorally
can avoid punishments, that supposedly the
entire Earth is drowning in immorality, that
supposedly people are ruled by the old Darwin's
principle of the "survival of fittest", that supposedly
if someone does NOT listen to the voice of own
conscience, then this does NOT mean that he is
to be forced to die prematurely at a young age,
etc., etc. Therefore, these people who decide to
learn the truth, must find manners of "separating
grain from the chaff" and to learn finding a relationship
between an immorality and a premature death (or
between immorality and e.g. bankrupting or disintegration
of "group intellects").
#G4.
Where to search for evidence which confirms, that "lives are terminated for a majority of intellects deaf to the voice of their conscience":
Motto:
"Truth which would be obvious and easy to confirm would also break our 'free will'."
Let us now review the already identified by
the author of this web page areas of life, in
which these people who wish to accomplish
certainty that really "if someone ceases
to listen to the voice of his or her conscience,
then probably will die prematurely for this",
can seek the required empirical evidence. So
here are examples of most productive sources
of such evidence:
1.
Personal findings. Myself, I used to know many
persons which died at relatively young age, and the
morality of which I remember until today. Thus, I am
absolutely certain, that these people did NOT listen to
the voice of their conscience. For this reason, the primary
example of sources of the evidence described here,
are moral analyses of people whom we know in person,
and about whom we know that they died at relatively
young age. In my own case I described these analyses
in item #D3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.
But every reader is also able to carry pout similar analyses
for cased that he or she knows in person.
2.
Epidemics of depression and suicides amongst youth
which is deprived of help of parents in development
of the ability to listen to the voice of own conscience.
Another source of such empirical evidence are "epidemics
of depression and suicides in present young citizens"
of countries in which prevails the legal ban on the use
of proverbial "rod" (e.g. in New Zealand). After all, in
present times increasingly less young citizens have in
there the privilege to grow up in conditions that would
teach them to listen to the voice of their conscience.
In turn one amongst most educational and morally
inspiring (but only for other people) manners of later
elimination of such people deaf to the voice of own conscience,
is suicide. This is because there is a direct cause-effect
link between deafness to the voice of own conscience and
suicides. This link is a consequence of work of the
"mental depression". It stems from the fact,
that people who are deaf to the voice of their conscience
are unable to accumulate in their counter-bodies the
required amount of so-called "moral energy". In turn
the lack of this "moral energy" causes in them a
"mental depression" - as this is explained more
thoroughly in item #D10 on the web page named
totalizm.htm.
Mental depression in turn typically leads to a suicide.
A best illustration of just such a work of moral mechanisms
is the situation with youth in New Zealand - as this is
summarised in articles "Suicide and crashes drive
NZ's youth death figures" from page A6 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Thursday, April 26, 2012; and "Kiwi
teens' death rate second highest in Western World"
from page A5 of newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, April 26, 2012. After all,
New Zealand is the country in which prevails the
official ban on disciplining with proverbial "rods"
children and teenagers (punished by imprisoning
of parents who try to discipline their children or
teenagers) - as this is explained in item #B5.1 from
this web page. How unruly youth this makes, it is
revealed by increasingly more frequent news about
its extremely immoral behaviours - of the type of
scoffing and biting of 87-years old person for whom
teenagers devastated trees, as described in the article
"Who's going to make us?" from page A1 of New
Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Monday, April 17, 2012 (a photograph
of this nasty bitted oldie is shown in the article "Plea
to public to catch teenage thugs" from page A5 of newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Monday, April 18, 2012). This lack of
disciplining, and also absence of structure, requirements
and responsibilities in lives of New Zealand youth, is
a cause, that increasingly larger proportion of these
young people develops in themselves a deafness to
the voice of their conscience. This in turn causes,
that already in times of writing this item in May 2012,
New Zealand youth had one amongst the highest in the
world levels of mental depression and suicides - as
this is explained and supported with references in
item #D3 of a separate web page named
god_exists.htm,
and in item #G1 above on this web page. Also all signs
on heaven and Earth indicate, that with the elapse of time
this situation will be escalated even further.
3.
Epidemics of mental illnesses in young people. From
times in which I was myself disciplined with a proverbial
"rod", I remember until today perfectly well, that is I did
something wrong, and the punishment was NOT served
to me, then the mechanism that governs my emotions
balanced my pangs of conscience and feelings of guilt,
through a significant increase of the feeling of inner
"anguish" - as this is described already in item #G1
from this web page. In turn remembering the power
of pressure that this feeling of anguish exerted on my
young mentality, I am NOT surprised at all, that it is
increased cumulatively with subsequent unpunished
behaviours of a given child that are contradictive to
the voice of its conscience. This in turn, in my opinion,
leads directly to a mental illness of that child. Thus,
a shocking epidemics of mental illnesses which lately
troubles increasingly more children in New Zealand,
in my opinion is a consequence of the governmental
ban on disciplining children with a proverbial "rod"
(punishable by imprisoning of a parent who have the
courage to discipline of his or her child in spite of
this legal ban on disciplining). On the subject of this
epidemics of mental illnesses amongst New Zealand
children one can read e.g. in the article "Mental illness
on rise in children" from page A1 of newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Monday, March 26, 2012.
4.
Immoral character of departures from this world.
Young people who become deaf to the voice of their
conscience, in many cased depart from this world in
a manner, which even for people unfamiliar with the
philosophy of totalizm
looks at obviously "immoral". (Although such an "immoral
departure" are also "suicides" described in the previous
paragraph, but in present times NOT many people still
knows, that committing a suicide is a highly immoral
action, which in its bad consequences is comparable
only to homosexuality described in item #B4 from the web page
antichrist.htm.)
For example, in New Zealand quite a number of young
people kills themselves when they still a car from someone,
and then takes it for "a spin" after priori drinking an alcohol
or taking drugs - which departure from this world is immoral
in a manner so obvious, that one does NOT need to even
test it with criteria of morality. Such an unnaturally high
number of deaths of youth in the result of car accidents
is reported e.g. in the article "Kiwi teens' death rate
second highest in Western World" from page A5 of
New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, April 26, 2012.
5.
Untypical coincidences in these people who died in mass
accidents, or who survived such accidents. If in any
statistical moment of time one considers the distribution
of morality of people that travel in e.g. a given tram, train,
boat, or entering a given building or factory, then for
typical cases this distribution is purely accidental and
represents a cross-section of almost all moralities that
dominate a given society. Thus if God decides to cause
a catastrophe of a vehicle or a building, which is to kill
almost all people that are inside, then in order to fulfil the
principle of the "survival of most moral", God must cause,
that at the time of this catastrophe inside are present either
only those selected to die, or that most moral amongst them
are going to be saved in some miraculous manner. And so,
if one analyses reports from typical cases which causes
mass deaths of many people simultaneously, then what hits
is that extraordinary nature of fates of these people who
are inside. Namely, rapidly inside find themselves a number
of people, who typically NOT supposed to be in there, and
only some extraordinary coincidences directed them to
that place. Simultaneously, a number of people who should
be inside, for some strange coincidences cannot be in there.
In addition to this, frequently in such a mass deaths by
some miraculous manner single persons do survive, which
later typically treat this survival as a kind of "command or
message from God". In total, all this kind of circumstances
and situations are another source of evidence, that God
consequently implements His principle of the "survival of
most moral". Only that God always camouflages this principle,
so that He does NOT destroy "free will" in people, and also
that He does NOT allow to discover the truth about it without
contributing into searches the required amount of effort
and work. (Of course, during researching such cases one
must also bear in mind, that there are buildings - like prisons
or television stations, factories - like producers of cigarettes
and alcohol, or vehicles - like prison buses or airplanes for
transporting members of governments, which do NOT contain
inside the cross-section of all moralities that dominate a given
society. Thus mass accidents which they can also experience
do NOT represent a kind of evidence described in this item.)
6.
Fates of children and teenagers from these families, in
which women take over all decisions about upbringing,
i.e. fates of these children which old Polish folklore described
with a highly negative warning of
"upbringing without a father figure" (in the Polish
language usually expressed with words "bez ojca chowany"),
or described with the swearing "bastard" (in Polish language
"bękart" or "nojdór"). (Notice, that the warning "upbringing
without a father" included also children from families in
which father lived and was present, but he was a "henpecked
husband" and in his house he had NO say because of the
loudmouth mother who dominated him never consulted him
nor never let him implements his ways.) In English cultures
(e.g. in New Zealand) most clearly people are NOT aware
of the destructive influence which upbringing without the
father's discipline has on a given young person. After
all, they do NOT have in there their equivalent of the
Polish warning "bez ojca chowany" (although they use
the swearing "bastard"). Furthermore, over there they
continually make further laws that in various manners
alienate fathers from influence on upbringing of their
children. E.g. they make laws contradictive to the
God commands and requirements, of the kind of "anti-smacking
law" discussed in item #B5.1 from that web page -
which specifically forbids disciplining children (for
details and consequences of this law see the article
"Smack admission bars grandparents" from page A2 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Tuesday, June 18, 2012); laws of so-called
"civil unions"; rights for adopting children by pairs of
lesbians or homosexuals; irresistibly high benefits for
so-called "solo parents", i.e. benefits supposedly for
both sexes but which encourage mainly unmarried
women that instead of going to work and earning for
living, they rather make another baby whose father remains
officially unknown; etc., etc. However, everyday lives
increasingly more often also in there reveal consequences
of the lack of fatherly discipline. A relatively good example
of just such consequences provides the self-explanatory
article "Man accused of journalist's murder 'never had a father
figure in his life' " from page A3 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, May 24, 2012. Even more
meaningful example of consequences of "upbringing
without a father figure" is in a summary of the murder
of a teenager prostitute provided in the article "Sad
ending to a tragic young life" from page A6 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, June 21, 2012 - in the
content of which are also contained information which
make easier for the reader to deduce whether this prostitute had a
habit to NOT listen to the voice of own conscience. This all in turn
reveals, that the source of quite vital evidence is establishing
"who" actually causes that e.g. a given young person
ceases to listen to the voice of own conscience. As it turns
out, in my research I never encountered a case, that the
primary reason for someone's deafness to the voice
of conscience was a father. Practically always this reason
turns ou to be a mother alienated (out of control) from male
influence , or some other dictatorial female in the power
of which a given young person finds itself. (Sometimes
can also be some female politicians, or some governmental
institutions acting under a dictatorship of some females.)
Therefore, in cases when there is a lack of information on the
subject of morality of a given person who died prematurely,
then it may suffice to check who was a "head of family"
which carried out upbringing of which a given young
person (means, whether a "head of family" in fact was
then a woman). This is because the empirical evidence
seems to reveal, that upbringing under a dictatorship of
a female typically just by itself is a sufficient confirmation
of a probability, that a given young person is unable to
listen to the voice of own conscience. As explains this
more extensively item #B2 from the web page named
antichrist.htm,
women were created by God as highly imperfect creatures
which cannot be allowed exclusiveness and domination
in deciding about fates of anyone, and which should
rather co-decide in continuous consultation with
men. After all, opposite to men - who almost entire
their action base on the decisions of minds, while
emotions use only when were forced, women in their
activities are governed almost exclusively by emotions,
while minds they use only if to use of them they are
somehow forced. In the result of all these, women
typically are in their actions highly biased, impulsive,
inconsistent, non-subjective, unjust, unpredictable, etc.
But the present science does NOT allow them to learn
own imperfections, but rather erroneously tells them,
that "women are able to do everything that men do".
In turn without being aware of own imperfections,
women do NOT work on eliminating or compensating
them with the male assistance. On the other hand, to
teach someone of listening to the voice of own conscience,
one must NOT be ruled by emotions and be biased,
but one needs to work wisely, predictably, objectively,
and just - as typically this is done by fathers who
perform roles of true "heads of family". In other words,
although the presence of fatherly discipline
is just one amongst a whole array of requirements which
must be fulfilled in order a given child learns to listen to
the voice of own conscience, but the lack of
fatherly discipline is already a sufficient reason for a
child to become deaf to the voice of own conscience.
There are also various research, which perfectly well
illustrate how undesirable is leaving to women alone
the decision regarding some matter concerning justice,
conscience, wisdom, etc. Only that to NOT endanger
own career because of these numerous feminists
ready to bite "heads off" from every person which
have a courage to reveal a truth about women, the
actual meaning of outcomes of these research usually
is camouflaged on various manners. An excellent
example of just such camouflaging of outcomes of
research concerning women, can be e.g. the article
"Female teachers get blame for schoolboy slackers'
poor results" from page A3 of newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Friday, February 17, 2012. In spite
of pleasing for women title, that article describes solid
research which reveal, that female teachers chronically
practice injustice through lowering marks that they give
to boy pupils, in comparison to marks that the same
female teachers give to female pupils for products of
the same quality. (Exactly the same experiences with
female teachers and lecturers I remember from years
of my own education - as emphasized in item #B2 of the web page
antichrist.htm.)
7.
Deaths of "group intellects". God NOT only
terminates lives of individual people who become
deaf to the voice of own conscience, but also makes
exactly the same with entire so-called "group
intellects" (e.g. institutions) which also ceased
to listen to the voice of their group conscience.
(An explanation of the term "group intellect" is
provided in item #E2 of the web page named
totalizm.htm.)
Only that dying like individual people, these group
intellects bankrupt, are dissolved, replaced by
other or absorbed by other, etc. Of course, for
them this also represents a kind of "death", as
they cease to exist and something different appears
on their place. For example, almost every country,
which after an immoral aggression onto a different
country looses a war that it started, after loosing
a war is replaced by already a different kind of
that country - as an example consider Hitler's
Germany after the second world war. An excellent
example of just such "group intellects" (institutions)
killed by God for the deafness to their voice of
conscience, are New Zealand so-called "Finance
Companies" (i.e. like private banks). Since 2008
in New Zealand bankrupted scores of them, while
on their subject one could read interesting news
in almost every issue of local newspapers. The
attribute of almost all of them was, that a long
time before they bankrupted, all of them ceased
to listen to the voice of their "group conscience".
For example, at the time when they were formed,
their directors typically had only so much money,
as their future clients. But at the moment of bankrupting,
their clients were deprived of their savings while
it turned out that directors are incredibly rich,
live in million-dollar mansions, have expensive
cars and big bank accounts, their wives, children
and relatives have "trusts" full of money, etc. In turn
to facilitate this kind of flows of funds, these institutions
for sure remained deaf to the voice of their conscience.
Quite a good insight to culture and kind of morality
practiced by persons who governed these institutions
(e.g. by their "directors") provides e.g. an article
"His tastes went up ... with his fraud" from page C1
of the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Friday, May 4, 2012; or the article
"Keeping the rats out of the race" from page C1 of
the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post Weekend,
issue dated on Saturday, May 5, 2012. Therefore
mass bankrupting of such institutions is another
source of evidence, that "intellects which ceased
to listen to the voice of their conscience are eliminated
from living". When such immoral "group intellects"
are eliminated by God, indirectly are punished all
people who are members of these intellects,
and thus whose fates are linked to fates of
these intellects - e.g. in case of bankrupting
of these "finance companies" punished are also
all their clients who loose money invested into
them and also all employees who loose their
places of work and their incomes. This their
group punishment is for "remaining passive
in face of immorality of the group intellect to which
one belongs" - as this is explained in item #B4 of web page
parasitism.htm
and more precisely discussed in item #E1 of the web page
quake.htm.
What also is highly interesting, that independently from
this group punishment served to all people that belong
to such immoral group intellects, parallel and independently
the highest possible "death punishment" are
also educationally punished these figures who in such
group intellects are directly responsible for committing
immoralities - e.g. consider fates of leaders from Hitler's
Germany, or see the article "Failed finance firm founder
has cancer" from page A7 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, May 24, 2012. Of course,
these "finances companies" indicated here as an
example, are just ones amongst many "group intellects"
(i.e. banks, firms, institutions, entire countries, etc.)
which are eliminated from the life according to the
principle of the "survival of most moral" because of
immoralities that they committed. Another widely
known examples of such immoral intellects were
also, amongst others, Hitler's Germany, Communistic
Russia, or not long ago Gaddafi's Libya. What even
worse, because the blindness of the old official
science which still did NOT gain a competence to
warn politicians about the existence and work of
the principle of the "survival of most moral"
and to explain them to what immorality leads, in recent
times increasingly larger number of further intellects
begins to march in the same direction and only there
is a matter of time when God is to eliminate them from
living ones.
#G5.
But let us remember, that God makes intelligent decisions,
thus to every principle He introduces exceptions that are
based on His goals and on His wise judgement of the current situation:
Motto:
"Only in the world ruled by a thoughtless nature and unchangeable laws of physics there would be NO exceptions."
When we seek empirical evidence to confirm
conclusively that "God kills intellects which
ceased completely listening to the voice of
their conscience", we must also remember,
that God is the superior being of extreme
intelligence, and thus in that rule He makes
exceptions in terminating,
when the termination of life of an intellect
would be contradictive to God's goals or
plans. Several situations, when God makes
just such exceptions and suspends putting
to death people who definitively deserved
to die, already now were identified by the
"totaliztic science". Let us list here most
vital amongst them, soe that the reader
has awareness of their existence and work.
A.
When killing a given intellect would deprive someone
his or her "free will". The ability of people to think
and to act accordingly to their "free will" is so important
for God, that in order to give to people this "free will"
God voluntarily took on Himself a whole array of obstacles
an d requirements - as this is explained, amongst others,
in item #B1 from this web page. For example, it is just
that people keep their "free will" that in everything that
God does are inserted at least three groups of independent
attributes, which later allow to explain this into at least
three different manners - as this is explained in item
#C2 from the web page named
tornado.htm.
It is also to NOT deprive people of "free will", that
none scientific researches nor displays of skills
of radiesthesians provide outcomes higher than statistic -
although normally the same radisthesians found almost
all natural resources that are known to the humanity.
On a similar principle, never a UFO sighting occurs
in a manner which would disperse all doubts, nor
never a single UFO photograph provides a proof
for the objective existence of UFOs - in spite that
the actual existence of UFOs is already proven
formally e.g. see the web page named
ufo_proof.htm.
B.
When a given intellect generates a significant "intensity
of the stream of teaching information", so that for God
it has a higher "information significance" when still remains
alive, than when it is dead - as this is described in
item #B7.2 and in (2) from item #B7 of the web page
seismograph.htm
and in item #K1 from the web page named
quake.htm.
As this was explained in item #G3 from this web page,
in order people could maintain
their "free will", in spite that God really rewards "morality"
and punishes "immorality", the same God simultaneously
creates on the Earth such appearances, as if rewarded
was "immorality" and the use of physical force, while
punished was "morality" and the physical weakness.
But in order these appearances could be formed, it is
necessary that several "exceptions" do exist, in which
these immoral people who generate a high "intensity
of the stream of teaching information", are temporally
excluded from the punishment that they deserved.
C.
When a given intellect somehow assists with his immoral
actions in fulfilment of the God's will, and thus when
still alive he is more useful for God than when he
would be dead. Examples of just such intellects
are, amongst others, some mass murderers, the
punishment of which God temporally suspends and
shifts at a later date, because e.g. "they hear voices
of God" in their heads, and thus they are susceptible
for a precise directing as to who and in what order
they supposed to "send" to another world. After all,
from the timeless point of view of God, these murderers
are NOT escaping the "universal justice", while their
activities may in the meantime be used for more
effective education of the humanity, or for removal
of these too-eager people who with their actions
obstruct God's goals. (Descriptions of just such
"voices in heads" heard by some mass murderers,
are provided in #77 from subsection W4 in volume
18 of my newest
monograph [1/5].)
Of course, such exceptions is more. But even just
these most important listed above, provide the reader
with a relatively good idea how God acts in order to
accomplish His goals most effectively.
If one considers the above exceptions, then the
principle of God's acting described here should
be formulated in a manner which emphasizes,
that "NOT all" intellects which are deaf
to the voice of their conscience are put to death
prematurely by God. For example, this principle
could be expressed by the statement that
"intellects which
ceased to listen to the voice of their conscience,
have a high chance, that they become put to
death prematurely by God".
Unfortunately, I am carrying out my research
only on principles of a "private scientific hobby",
means without any financing and exclusively in
my private time. So I do NOT have a "processing
]power", financial means, nor an official support,
which would allow me to investigate what percent
of intellects dies in what time after ceasing to
listen to their conscience.
* * *
A highly interesting is also a fact, that in order
to more effectively accomplish His superior goals,
God introduced also exceptions to
the principle of the "survival of most moral" -
described at the beginning of item #G1 from this
web page. Some amongst these exceptions state
as follows:
D.
Every intellect which individually acts relatively moral,
but displays a passiveness towards the group
immorality of a larger group intellect to which it belongs,
ceases to be protected by the principle of the "survival
of most moral". Thus if this intellect finds itself in
the range of some disaster which affects the immoral
group intellect to which it belongs, then it gets hits on
equal foot as other (immoral) participants of this group
intellect. A best example of work of this exception were
Japanese who on Friday, 11 March 2011 fell victims
of tsunami and nuclear catastrophe - as this is described
in items #C7 and #I1 on the web page
seismograph.htm.
For a wider description of this caused by passiveness
removal from the protection that is deserved by most
moral intellects - see item #B4 on the web page named
parasitism.htm.
E.
Every intellect which practices a "manifesting religiousness"
instead of true "morality", also ceases to be protected by
the principle of the "survival of most moral". In my
life I encountered many persons, who behaved extremely
religiously, but who continually were affected by various
disasters. So I frequently analysed reasons of just such
their treatment by God. The major attribute which hit eyes
in them, is that they were NOT moral in their interactions
with other people, but only manifestly practiced their
religion. The limited their religious practices to only
manifestly worshipping God. But their countryman
they treated almost like animals. However, the
"morality" depends on
obeying God's requirements in our interactions
with all other people with which we need to interact
in our lives - for an exact definition of
"morality" see item #B5 on the web page
morals.htm.
So if someone puts all his attention to worshipping
God, but ignores his or her duty to treat morally all
people, then he or she ceases moral life and is for
this severely punished by God. In Poland the most
frequently occurred a female version of such persons -
which all called in there "dewotka". But their
male versions also recently is a lot - especially to the
south-east from Poland. All signs indicate also that
God has NO intention to tolerate any longer their
manifesting religiousness, behind which they hide
their immoral treatment of other people.
F.
Prematurely can also die an exceptionally moral intellect,
if he or she voluntarily offers to God the life, while
his or her death significantly accelerates education
and lifting of morality of a large number of people.
An example of this exception are voluntarily, martyr
deaths of almost all Christian saints. But at this point it
should be emphasized, that these exceptionally moral
people die only if they volunteer to their death.
This is because God respects their exceptionally moral
behaviour and do NOT shorten their lives against their
own wish and without consulting their own wishes in
this matter.
Because of the action of exceptions as these above,
the truth of the statement reversal to the one discussed
in item #G2 (and emphasized with a red colour several
paragraphs above) turns out to NOT be just an
automatic. Namely, because of such exceptions,
"NOT all intellects which
died prematurely, the death affected because they
did NOT listened to the voice of their conscience".
The cause for such a state of things is, amongst others,
the fact that many intellects dies prematurely because
e.g. they are components of other, larger, "group intellects".
Thus whatever affects them, does NOT result from
conscience, but from failing their moral duties towards
the "group intellect" a part of which they are (i.e.
from "not doing whatever they should do") For example,
in case of today teenagers, frequently they die prematurely
"as a punishment", that in spite of listening to their
conscience, they still remained passive (as
this is explained in item #B4 on the web page named
parasitism.htm)
and did NOT persuaded against immoral action of
these "group intellects" to which they belonged.
This is because the passiveness towards group
immorality God treats the same as the participation
in this immorality. AN excellent example of just such
situation can be a trip of a young person that
listen to the voice of its conscience in a stolen
car which is driven by someone who do NOT listen
to the conscience. If this car has an accident, then
may die all ones which travelled in it. The person
which stole it and driven dangerously may die
because he did NOT listen to the voice of own
conscience, while the passenger who listens to
own conscience also may die - because in spite
of belonging to the same "band" he had a habit
of remaining passive towards immorality of this "band"
and thus he did NOT persuade his colleagues against
stealing and too fast driving.
Since the new "totaliztic science discovered only
in 2012, that the life of intellects is ruled by the
principle of the "survival of fittest", a next task which
would be worth to investigate thoroughly, is the
scientific checking on the basis of empirical
evidence available to us, whether in fact the
"universal justice" causes, that God assigns to
every person the length of life which is proportional
to the expressed quantitatively level of morality
of this person. (Unfortunately, the completion
of such research exceeds my financial capabilities
and my available time.) In order such research
also finish with a success, it would be enough
to check for a statistically a large sample of people
who do NOT belong to the abovementioned God's
exceptions, whether the ratio of the length of life
in subsequent people, to these 120 years promised
to people by God (see the Bible, "Genesis", 6:3),
is equal to the ratio of a quantitative indicator of
morality of these people, to the quantitative indicator
of morality of the God's "ideal person". (This
God's "ideal person" - which in the result of action
of the principle of the "survival of most moral" should
live to the age of 120 years that God promised to
people in the Bible, is briefly described in item #C5
from this web page.) After all, the above findings
would from one hand allow to exactly prognosis
how long a given person is going to live - through
quantitative estimation of a kind of morality that this
person practices. On the other hand it would allow
us to estimate the level of morality of subsequent
people on the basis of age to which they lived. For
example, if a statistical life expectancy for a given
country amounts to 72 years, then this would mean
that citizens of that country in average are only in
M = (72/120)*100% = 60% moral. Because this
statistic life expectancies are already well known
and published for every country in the world,
calculating such values would allow us to better
choose a country to which we e.g. would emigrate,
shifted for the time of our retirement, or just visited.
Furthermore, it would allow us to trace how is and
how changes the average morality in the country
in which we live permanently, in comparison to
moralities of other countries in the world.
#G6.
How to overcome obstacles and dilemmas and begin to defend
yourself and your loved ones from sharing the fate of such
intellects deaf to the voice of their conscience?
Motto:
"Totalizm always helps."
The general principle of defence from premature
death caused by the deafness to the voice of own
conscience is simple. Namely, in
everything that we do we should consult our actions
with the voice of our conscience. But
in practice this defence is quite difficult for many reasons.
For example, because "doing of what is moral
must be difficult, otherwise lying on our back and
doing nothing would be the most moral behaviour
in the entire world" - as more thoroughly
explains this item #E3 on the web page named
god_exists.htm.
In turn listening to our voice of conscience and
carrying out whatever this conscience tells us to
do, is a highly moral behaviour. Therefore in the
world governed by God it must be difficult, and
truly it is so. This is why many people with the
elapse of time become deaf to the voice of
their conscience. What even worse, these ones
who already are deaf to their conscience, typically
are unaware of this their disability. (If the reader
wishes to check whether he himself, or someone
adult from his surroundings, is already deaf to
the voice of own conscience, then he can use
for that purpose the checking "test" described
in item #A2.7 from the web page named
totalizm.htm.)
Teaching own children to listen to the voice of
their conscience also turns out to be difficult
in practice. After all, if for example we are a
father and a head of family, then the justly punishing
our child with a rod gives to us a characteristics
similar to that of a dentist - when we need to be
painful in order to be a good parent in the final
count. Thus, if the conscience commands to us
that we should justly punish our child with a proverbial
"rod", because this child just did something very
wrong, then immediately we encounter a whole
array of factors which make this difficult for us.
The first amongst these probably will be our wife,
which - as all women (i.e. beings created by God
with a high level of imperfection - as this is explained
in item #B2 from the web page named
antichrist.htm)
will probably make this impossible for us. Then -
if by any chance we live in a country which established
anti-parental laws (such as these prevailing in New
Zealand and which are described in item #B5.1
from this web page) we must risk a prison because
of the use of a rod while the law forbids this.
Furthermore, on our way are to stand also our
own feelings - how to use a "rod" on a child which
we love a lot. Another obstacle will be this child -
which after being disciplined will run to the street
and complain to everyone that "the father bit me -
thus I hate him, because he is much worse than
mum and he does NOT love me". Etc., etc.
Therefore, such fathers who decide to discipline
their children with a proverbial "rod", are forced to
overcome all these obstacles (Also every wise and
thoughtful mum - i.e. a mother deprived typical female
imperfections, is forced to overcome similar obstacles,
when e.g. temporally her husband is absent, and
thus she is forced to serve the justice to her
child on her own.) In addition, fathers must also
learn to use a rod "justly". Means the punishment
which they serve must be proportional to the
guilt. It also cannot cause in a child any physical
damage to the body. Furthermore, it should be
proceeded with a verbal explanation why it is
served, how much it amounts to (for a given
kind of misbehaviour), and how in the future this
child should behave in order to NOT deserve it
anymore. Psychologically a highly helpful is
also establishing for the use of a child a form
of mutually accepted "pardoning" or "asylum" - i.e.
the creation of some difficult to accomplish by
a child, and known both, to this child and to parents,
manner of avoiding a punishment (but this manner
must fulfil a number of important conditions - e.g.
must work almost instantly, because serving a
punishment must not be postponed, it cannot
depend on doing of some routinely chore, because
a child with the elapse of time develops an "allergy"
to this particular chore, etc.) In other words, everything
that concerns such a punishment must be agreeable
with moral recommendations of the
philosophy of totalizm
described in volumes 6 and 7 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
Of course, children and teenagers also can
by themselves work on developing their sensitivity
to the voice of own conscience. After all, wise God
for children make such self-learning of the obedience
to the voice of conscience much easier than teaching
it by adults. Children from the very beginning have
this skill - as this is explained by the article [1#G1]
from item #G1 of this web page. Later they only need to
make sure that they do NOT loose it e.g. because
of a bad influence of their peers, teachers, mass
media, politicians, authorities, etc. But in order
children and teenagers undertake their own efforts in
such a right direction, someone amongst adults
must explain to them exactly on examples which
are illustrative and acting onto their imagination,
"why" this should be done in their lives. In other words,
someone amongst adults must firstly explain to
them what is written in this "part #G" - only that
beforehand he or she must translate this onto
the language which children are able to understand.
The above is worth to complement with an information,
that these people who in an aware manner begin to
listen and obey their organ of conscience, automatically
become
totalizts.
This is because practicing the most basic version
of the philosophy of totalizm, i.e. the version called
intuitive totalizm,
boils down just to listening and to obeying the voice
of our conscience.
#G7.
When a death already glances into our eyes - frequently still is NOT too late to begin our defence:
Motto:
"Wherever there is a life, there is also a hope."
Many people sucked into a whirl of present
life, still healthy, and chasing increasingly
larger collections of money, cars, electronics,
partners, etc., with which they try to match Johnsons,
do NOT find time nor motivation to read pages
like this one, nor have a habit to listen and to
obey the voice of their conscience. The awaking
arrives to them only when the time of accountability
comes and thus when they look death straight
into eyes. This is because if God still
does NOT consider them to be completely lost
cases, then He does NOT kill them instantly,
but still gives them a bit of time for acting, for
improvement, for saying good bye to life and
to world, etc. Thus, they may learn then e.g. that
they have some nasty kind of cancer, that the
illness which overtook them has a significant chance
to be terminal, that the boat in which they are
travelling is just sinking, etc., etc. Is it too late
to begin a defence in such situation? It turns
out that NO - according to the Bible never is
too late for a defence. Only that one needs
to know what to do in such cases and how
to defend oneself. The key to our
defence then is the right kind of "prayer".
For most people, however, the problem is
that they do NOT know how to pray for the
survival or for being saved from a cataclysm.
For example, the most common error in such
prayers to God is to just ask for our rescue -
which mistake I will explain in the next
paragraph of this section. Also, if someone
already offers something to God in return
for the healing or survival, than it
tend to be just own money, NOT a personal
action. However God
needs our actions completed in person, NOT
our gifts of money. After all,
for God to cause that someone in a need gets
our money, does NOT require that we remain
alive. This is because someone else can
also give our money to people in need,
e.g. money can give our heir inspired
by the divine promptings.
In turn our action completed in person
become possible only in cases if God
keeps us alive. Other common mistake
in prayers for the rescue is that if
someone actually offers to God some
their work completed in person, then
the typical offer is to carry out an
unskilled labour, for example as a nurse,
cleaner, cook, etc. But God has many
donors of unskilled labour. However,
in His service is the lack of people
whose work requires high knowledge,
experience, education, etc. After all,
people with high knowledge and skills
typically are "atheists" which almost
NEVER offer to God their expensive
skills in service for the good of
other people. Thus,
the more qualified
and skilled is a kind of personal work that
one offers to God in prayers as an exchange
for recovery or for saving, and the less
people exist who can do this particular work
for God, the greater chance that God will
accept such an offer. Another common
mistake of such prayers to God is to offer
the work of other people who are employees
of the person who prays, that is, to offer
the work of subordinates, workers, or the
family of the person in trouble. Yet for
God, each person is responsible only for
his or her own actions. Thus, work of other
people (than the praying person) is a
matter between God and these other people.
Summing up, it is good when
long time before the "death looks into
our eyes", we already consider what
kind of work done by us in person for the
good of humanity we will be able to offer
to God in exchange for our recovery or
rescue. The early identifying
of a highly attractive such a work may save
our lives, and the immediate implementation
of this work can cause that God may save us
even from experiencing a situation when we
will be forced to either offer to God our
work, or to die prematurely.
In the cases discussed here, when the "death
looks us straight into our eyes", there are
numerous levels our defence which we then should take.
The first and the most important level of our
defence, is to convince God with our fast and
sincere prayer, that we ourselves deeply believe
that from the prospective of His superior
goals and intentions, it will be more beneficial
when God keeps us alive than when He allows
us to die. Although almost every person which
looks death straight into eyes, rapidly remembers
God and starts to pray hard (according to an old
Polish saying that "when in trouble then to God" -
in the original Polish language "kiedy trwoga
to do Boga"), but the majority of such people
typically do NOT know how to pray in such circumstances
and how to present to God their request to keep
them alive. Typically the majority of people in such
situations only ask God in their prayers e.g.
"keep me alive, because I am afraid to die and
I still wish to live slightly longer". But from the
point of view of goals and intentions of God such
a request does NOT contain anything that would
make their lives worth extending. Therefore, the
most vital component
of prayers in such situations is to include into them
a kind of agreement or a promise addressed to
God. After all, just such agreements
or promises are included into most vital prayers of
religious practitioners from the Far East (e.g. from Hinduism
or Taoism - consider the essence of their rituals
called "Thaipusam" or "Nine Gods", photographs
from which are shown as "Fig. #B1" from the web page
god.htm
and "Fig. #E3" from the web page
soul_proof.htm).
Also such way of praying during centuries of their
interactions with God turned out to be the most
effective. Namely, in our praying we should include
e.g. a promise, that if God allows us to survive
a given situation and saves our life, then the entire
rest of living which God gives to us, we are going
to designate to a specific kind of service to God
through devoting our work for morality and for
good of other people. Of course, in our prayers
we should NOT use general statements of the kind,
that "we will help other people", but we must present
to God a specific activities which we are going
to carry out as our form of "serving God for the
good of other people". After all, depending on
how attractive for goals and intentions of God
turn out these specific proposals that we are to
declare, it will determine whether God is going
to grant a survival for us. Thus, we should promise
God that if we come out alive from a given situation,
then specifically either e.g. we begin to help
voluntarily and free of charge in the local
orphanage, hospice, asylum, poorhouse, etc.;
or that e.g. so many times a week we will provide
cooked meals to specific people who need these
(e.g. some known to us older or ill people); or
that e.g. we will openly promote the moral lives
according to principles of the philosophy of totalizm
(we should in such case define specifically how
we will implement this promotion - e.g. whether
we will establish for this appropriate web pages,
or write suitable articles to newspaper or periodicals,
write and publish a book, etc.); or that e.g. we will
openly support in some specific institutions, gatherings,
or forums ideas and principles established by the
"totaliztic science"; etc.; etc. Of course, I do NOT
need to explain here, that if we offer God such a
promise and we really get healthy or survive, then
it would be a kind of "spiritual suicide" to abandon
later the implementation of that promise to the letter.
We also must NOT begin to doubt "where really
our survival comes from" only because it will NOT
display spectacular attributes of a miracle. (After
all, almost everything that God does must fulfil the
"canon of ambiguity" described in item #C2 of
this web page, while is implemented by God according to
principles explained, amongst others, in item #C2 of page
tornado.htm.)
Money (funds) can be of a problem in the
fulfilment of our promise. But God Will
NOT consider then what excuse we have to
fail doing what we promised, and He is only
to judge whether we completed the promise,
or NOT. Therefore, if any of our
action requires funds which we do NOT
have, then we should NOT offer it in
our prayers (after all, offering
something that is impossible for
completing by us, would reveal to
God the lack of realism in our promises).
If we offer something that requires
funds, we must be prepared that the
cost of the completion of it is to be
covered from our own pocket. Similarly,
we should NOT pay other people so that
they do for us the work that we promised
to do ourselves. If we have the required
funds, then we should undertake ourselves
the implementation of an appropriately
large project, in which our funds are
to pay the cost of materials and the
cost of additional partners and sub-contractors,
but in which we ourselves will do the
most important work for this project.
The further emphasizing of our request in
such an important prayer to God, we can
accomplish if we have a moral basis to state,
that it is our first
request for a favour to ourselves
with which we come up since a long time.
This is because, although we should regularly
pray to God, typically - if we are NOT just
in a really critical situation, we should
altruistically ask God for something for
the good of other people rather than for
ourselves. The point is that if someone
poured a constant stream of requests to
God asking for something to himself, then
for example in the case of real life and
death situation, his prayer and request
becomes just another request from a long
list of his ongoing requests. In such a
situation, the value of this request would
NOT be of the same weight as it would be
if it was the first personal request for
a favour sent to God since a long time.
The second level of our defence, is a mental defence.
This is because we must NOT give up mentally,
but until the very end we must maintain an optimism
and the belief in our survival. After all, "wherever is
a life, there is still a hope". Thus, in every situation
when death glances us straight into eyes, we should
mobilise ourselves to a deep believe, that at the last moment
God still is to arrange for us some kind of a miracle,
which is to save us and thus that we are to come out
alive from even the most tragic situation. This is
because as the philosophy of totalizm has established
and explained this to us in item #A2.2 of the web page named
totalizm.htm,
in whatever we believe enough
deeply to be motivated by it to vigorous actions,
exactly the same God is going to serve to us.
The third level of our defence, is to
physically never give up, but to fight
for the survival until the very end.
After all, God's intention is the
upbringing of people through battle-hardening
during numerous fights against difficulties
of fate - as excellently reminds this to us the proverb
that "God helps these people who help themselves".
Therefore, in order to prove to God, how much
we want to come out alive from a given situation,
we should almost simultaneously undertake
all actions which are NOT mutually contradictive
and which give to us even a smallest chance of
coming out alive. For example, if we are ill
(e.g. with a cancer), we should NOT rely on just
a single method of healing, but we should undertake
simultaneously all methods which do NOT stand
in a mutual collision - means we should NOT only
undertake a conventional operation and chemotherapy
in a hospital, but also we should use an anti-cancer
diet, some alternative healing method (if we know
such a method - e.g. by drinking the juice from
"Sabah Snake Grass"
described in item #F6 of the web page named
healing.htm),
prayers, and if we can then even we should make
a pilgrimage to a place famous from miraculous
healings.
We also should NOT be ashamed of our fight
for life and for survival. This is because
the life is a greatest gift that God gave
to us. In turn by fighting for our life
(or for the life of anyone else) we
demonstrate to God that we appreciate
and highly respect this gift. It is
because of the respect to this highest
gift, that the
philosophy of totalizm
teaches, that "we should
support only these ideas and these people, who ask
us to live for them, while we must NOT support
anything that requires we die for it".
Of course, NOT every person deserves
to receive a "second chance" from God.
However, we do NOT need to look far
to discover body of evidence which
confirms that praying often helps
even in seemingly hopeless situations.
Thus, for many people the principle of
formulating of their prayers described
here may prove to be effective. Therefore,
in the critical situations, it is worth
to resort to it. After all, when the
death looks us straight into our eyes,
the only other option that is to remain,
is to give up and to die.
#G8.
What the above confirmations of God's warnings from the Bible
tell us, and also what it means that in spite of spitting at the Bible,
none amongst "atheistic orthodox scientists" has proven beyond
any doubt, that any statement from the Bible is a lie or a misdirecting:
Motto:
"The ancient Bible expresses timeless truths - so there is about the time
that people started to objectively interpret and confirm what it states, with
tools of modern science."
The above confirmations of God's warnings
from the Bible, the interpretation of which is
provided in item #G1, are just single ones from
a whole array of such confirmations which the
new "totaliztic science" accomplished due to
its "a priori" approach to research, and which
are listed and linked in item #A3 from a different
web page named
petone.htm.
These confirmations are additionally reinforced
by the fact, that in spite of many years long attacks
of the old, official "atheistic orthodox science"
onto statements of the Bible and God, as so-far
that old science has NOT managed to discover
and indicate in the Bible even a single statement
which beyond any doubt would be proven to be
a false or a misleading to people. (Although the
same science managed to find countless errors
in statements of humans made in times of the
Bible.) All this taken
together, gives to us a lot of food for thoughts.
After all, it tries to tell us, that it is about the time
to abandon the admiring the erroneous Darwin's
principle of the "survival of fittest" disseminated
around the world by that old "atheistic orthodox
science", and to begin the implementation of the
totaliztic principle of the "survival of most
moral". In turn the implementation of this
principle requires that people begin a scientific
translation into the present language, and
confirming on empirical evidence, the statements
of the ancient Bible with the attention, reliability,
and objectivity which this message from God
deserves. Also, it is about the time that the new
"totaliztic science" is officially established and
financed, so that instead of being represented
just by a single scientist (as it is still today) - i.e.
by the author of this web page, it could employ
officially more researchers who could effectively
continue scientific research and confirmation
of God and the Bible, which was started single-handidly
by the author of this web page.
Part #H:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#H1.
Summary of this web page:
As the reader probably is aware of this, myself
(means
the author of this web page - Dr Eng. Jan Pajak)
I am the scientists who is absolutly sure of the
existence of God. It is this being absolutely
sure caused that on this web page I decided
to simulate goals, intentions, and methods of
action of God.
Notice that the rest of this item
still awaits to be translated from Polish into English.
W wyniku owej symulacji
okazało się, że pogarszająca się obecnie
sytuacja ludzkości posiada swoje powody
i zamiary. Mianowicie, wszystko wskazuje
na to że Bóg za pomocą obecnej zmiany
warunków na Ziemi stara się osiągnąć
przewartościowanie stanowisk ludzi. A
więc przykładowo dotychczasowe "uwielbianie
Boga" przez ludzi wierzących, Bóg stara
się przetransformować w "badanie Boga
oraz wypełnianie praw boskich". Z kolei
dotychczasowe "pogłębianie niemoralnego
postępu" przez ateistów, Bóg stara się
przetransformować w "moralne wykuwanie
postępu".
Z niniejszego symulacyjnego ujawnienia
celów, intencji, oraz metod działania Boga
wynika dla nas możliwość ochotniczego
i dobrowolnego dopełnienia przez ludzi
owej transformacji którą Bóg rozpoczął
już nam natrzucać siłą. Wszakże jeśli
dokonamy owej transformacji ochotniczo,
wówczas zaoszczędzi to nam wielu męk i
upadków. Aby zaś ochotniczo dokonać
wymaganej transformacji, wystarczy aby
we wszystkim co się czyni zacząc uwzględniać
intencje Boga, aby zacząć działać tak jak
the
philosophy of totalizm
nam to nakazuje (czyli zawsze pedantycznie
moralnie), oraz aby w naszych opracowaniach
naukowych niezależnie od ateistycznego punktu
widzenia zacząć w końcu prezentować jak dana
sprawa wygląda w sytuacji istnienia Boga.
#H2.
Blogs of totalizm:
It is also worth to check periodically the blog
of totalizm currently available at addresses
totalizm.wordpress.com and
totalizm.blox.pl/html.
(Notice that all these addresses hold the same
blog with the same content of messages.)
On this blog many matters discussed here
are also explained with additional details
written as new events unveil before our eyes.
These readers who wish to discuss any
aspect that is addressed on this web page
will be pleased to know that public
discussions of almost all topic that
I researched currently, including many of
my devices and inventions, are carried out
in the Internet for a long time. Addresses of
subsequent threads in the Google discussion
groups, where these topics are exposed to
public comments, are listed in item #E2 of
the totaliztic web page
faq.htm.
Readers who have constructive comments
about any matters relating to my research
and inventions, are encouraged to find
addresses of these Google threads from
item #E2 of that web page "faq.htm",
and then voice their constructive opinions
at these addresses.
#H4.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
#H5.
Contact details to the
author
of this web page:
Emails and contact details to the
author
of this web page:
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
inquiries, or replies to questions which I ask on
my web pages, are provided on the web page
about me (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak).
That page also provides other commonly used
contact details to the author.
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
Therefore, if the reader sends a request to me,
I suggest to let me know somehow that he or
she actually went through the trouble of reading
my web pages and learning what these pages
try to say.
If you prefer to read in Polish
click on the flag below
(Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w języku polskim
kliknij na poniższą flagę)
Date of starting this page: 18 April 2008
Date of the latest updating of this page: 12 December 2012
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
