The battle for Milicz
(Bilingual, in English
and Polish )
(Parts of this web page still await to be translated - see these later)
Updated:
12 December 2012
Click "X" or "No" on e.g. messages of supposed errors, or on advertisements, if these try to interrupt your viewing of this web page.
Here
is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 2.)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
Each death is sad.
However, death of
young people saddens
the most. It is also
a huge loss for our
civilization.
Part #A:
Introductory information about this web page:
In the south-western part of Poland
there is a small township named
Milicz.
(Until the time of finishing the Second World
War it was named in German "Militsch".)
The rest of Poland knows not much about
this town, as beside of extensive forests,
numerous mosquito, fragrant lime trees,
and plentiful tasty carp-fish, Milicz is
unaware of having other attractions that
it could offer to visitors from a distant
world. The town already got used to
leading its half-sleepy life, resigning
from competing for attention of the
vibrant outside world. However, it has
something, that in other towns and cities
is NOT visible so well. Namely, it has
very educational history. For example,
it has a battle in the fairly recent
history, which in fact was a moral
summary of all battles of the world.
This web page is just about that
particular "battle for Milicz". Everything
that this web page describes, actually
did take place in real life.
#A1.
What and when motivated me to write this web page:
Around 1985 I discovered the existence
and operation of extraordinary laws of
the universe, called the
moral laws.
With the elapse of time I discovered also,
that these laws with an equal iron fist
rule the fate of both, individual people,
as well as entire nations, countries,
and even planets. About these laws I
write in item #I2 of this web page.
Because my profession is the very
noble job of a teacher, amongst many
moral laws my special attention attracted
the moral law which states that "every
event from the physical world
God
carries out in such a manner that
the educational impact of this
event on people is maximized".
Thus, when in June 2004 I started
to record the history of Milicz -
which I knew well from my
family stories, my attention was
attracted by the fact that the
battle for Milicz that took place
in the last phase of the World War
Two, actually summarized in itself
the moral essence of all battles of
the world. This inspired me to
bring somehow to light the moral
essence of this battle for Milicz,
and show it to the reader. Although
probably still in an imperfect way,
after many subsequent improvements
this web page hopefully implements
that my intention.
Fig. #A1 (A1 in [1/5]): To people equipped
by God into the organ called "conscience" applies
the principle of the "survival of most moral" -
described comprehensively in item #B1 from the
web page named
changelings.htm,
while briefly discussed also in items #E3 and #I2
below on this web page. The principle of the "survival
of most moral" was discovered only in 2012 by the
new "totaliztic science". For people it fulfils the same
role as the Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest" -
which, however, prevails only in the world of wild
animals which do NOT have organs of conscience.
Unfortunately, the old and incompetent "atheistic
orthodox science" erroneously extrapolated it also
to people. Because of the action of the principle
of the "survival of most moral", all wars always are
win by the most moral side, while lost by the most
immoral side (means typically lost by aggressors
who attacked someone that wanted to live in peace) -
for more details see item #C5.2 on the web page named
morals.htm.
Only that in order to fulfil the so-called "canon of
ambiguity" - which God uses always in order to
NOT deprive people their "free will" (that "canon
of ambiguity" is described, amongst others, in item
#C4.1 of the web page named
morals.htm
and in item #C2 of the web page named
will.htm),
the omnipotent and justly acting
God
always so controls the course of every war, that
depending of human views the win and the loss can
be explained on a whole array of different ways -
as this is outlined more comprehensively, amongst
others, in item #C2 of the totaliztic web page named
tornado.htm.
Of course, the old, slack, and incompetent "atheistic
orthodox science" explains these outcomes of wars
on its "own" atheistic" and erroneous manner - i.e.
as the result of work of the Darwin's principle of the
"survival of fittest". But because until the time of the
creation of the new "totaliztic science" that old "atheistic
orthodox science" held the absolute "monopole for
knowledge", previously NO-ONE challenged the
nonsense that the old science told to naive people
and to immoral politicians - for more details see
item #C1 on the totaliztic web page named
telekinetics.htm.
The above painting portraits a medieval battle in
Korea. Hits from it the scary enthusiasm with
which people are inclined to kill each other. The
picture reveals, that in the "human nature" -
intentionally designed by God as much imperfect
as it was only possible, existed (and still exist)
an array of low vices such as desires, inclinations,
wants, habits, addictions, etc.
In turn people must learn how they can
overcome these own low vices in order societies
could live in peace and prosperity. Independently
from desires and inclinations which throw people into
wars, to these belong also, amongst others, power,
sexual desires, greed, wish to dictate, etc., etc.
To the overcoming these desires and inclinations
supposed to motivate "religions" which God gradually
created and gave to subsequent nations and races
of people. Unfortunately, as we clearly can see it
in present times, religions did NOT fulfil their function
and the humanity still is following its desires and tendencies.
Obviously, the humanity needs something even more
perfect than religions and believes. In turn the only
thing that is really more perfect than belief, is knowledge.
So it appears, that the third millennium which the
humanity is just entering, must evolve the knowledge
on which human behaviours are acceptable, and
which must be curbed and controlled. Let us hope,
that instrumental in formulating this new knowledge,
turns out to be the new "totaliztic science", the product
of which is, amongst others, this web page.
* * *
If one wishes to shift
a given Figure (i.e. a photograph or a drawing) -
means if one wishes to move this Figure into
another part of the screen where e.g. a description
of it is located, and when simultaneously one
wishes to reduce or reconfigure the separate window
in which this illustration is to appear, then one needs
to do as follows: (1) click on this illustration to make
it appear in another new window, (2) make sure
that this new window is set for capability to be
reconfigured and shifting along the screen (for
this one needs to have a look at the middle square
out of the three squares present in the top-right
corner of the screen - this middle square should
contain inside just a single screen-icon, so if there
are two such screen-icons inside of it, then one
needs to click on them to turn them into a single
screen-icon), (3) the "downsize" or "reconfigure"
this another new window (with a given illustration)
through "grabbing" its right-bottom corner with the
mouse and then dragging this corner upwards-left
to receive the required size and configuration of
this different new window (notice that since this
new window is downsized or reconfigured, then
it is to stay this way for all next Figures being
clicked - unless one enlarges or reconfigures
the window again), and then (4) drag this another
new window with the Figure that one wishes to
relocate, to the area of the web page where
one wishes to look at it e.g. because there is
a description related to it (to move the new window
with a Figure, one needs to just grab it with the
mouse by the blue stripe on the top of it and then
drag it to the required place). Notice also that if
one scrolls (with scroll-bars) the text of a page
when one reads it, this another window (with the
illustration) is going to disappear. In order to
return it into the new position on the screen, one
needs to click on its "icon" (i.e. on the "program's
button" from the taskbar) in the lowest part of the
screen.
#A2.
What are goals of this web page:
Motto:
"Totalizm
teaches us, that the only ideas worth our support are these ones which require from us to live for them not to die for them."
The main goal of this web page and the
illustrative evidence which I presented
here to readers, is to publish my factual
documentation in support of the thesis,
that "fate of every war and every battle
in general, while the World War Two and
the 'battle for Milicz" in specific, is
governed with an iron hand by moral laws".
Additional goal of this web page is to
point the reader's attention at a simple
fact, that every war is extremely immoral,
murderous, and destructive, that every
war is senseless, that a war never solves
problems the appearance of which provided
convenient excuses to initiate it, and that
all of us together, as well as each one of
us separately, should do everything possible
so that our civilization never again
experiences even a single next war.
On the occasion of these goals, on
this web page I show how really
looked like the war and the "battle
for Milicz" when it was viewed from
the prospective of just ordinary and
frequently innocent people who were
sucked into it.
#A3.
An appeal to readers for further memoirs from the "battle for Milicz":
Our common memory of the past disappears
very fast. After all, these people who shaped
the past are just gradually dying out. In turn
the new generation typically starts to appreciate
the significance of history and the meaning
of roots from which they come to existence
only when it is already too late to save this
history and roots from vanishing. Therefore,
herewith I have an appeal to these readers
who in person went through and still remember
of any fragments of either the "battle for Milicz",
or the liberation of any settlement that is close
to Milicz - e.g. Sulmierzyce, Cieszków, Sułów,
Ostrzeszów, Twardogóra, Oleśnica, Żmigród,
etc. Namely, in such a case please write
to me and post me your memoirs from what
you lived through and still remember (my
addresses are indicated below in item #J2).
If it turns out that these memoirs contains any
learning values or any lessons for the future,
then I am going to try to publish them on this
web page.
Part #B:
Different facades of every truth - including the truth about the "battle for Milicz":
#B1.
Three main facades of histories written by people:
In subsection B7.2 from volume 2 of the newest
monograph [8e/2] "Totalizm"
it was explained that every truth can be embedded
into one amongst several possible facades. Each
of these fasades differs significantly from others.
For example, historical truths can be formed in
at lest three different facades (or "faces of truth"),
namely: (1) personal history, (2) official history,
or (3) folkloristic history. All these three different
"facades" of historic truth are to be explained in
more details in next items that are to follow.
In addition to this three facades of the history
told by people, there is also a completely
independent "true history" - means the true and
actual course of historical events which these
three human histories try to describe. Unfortunately,
for reasons explained further below, this "true
history" is known only to
God Himself.
Only God knows what is the absolute truth about
a given course of events. In turn histories described
by humans always hide various inherited errors
which practically never can be eliminated by
people.
In order to illustrate better to the reader that such
three different facades of the historical truth really
do exist, and that they really differ mutually, in
next "part #C" of this web page I am going to
present the existing and available for me examples
for each one of them, all of which present the same
"battle for Milicz".
#B2.
Personal histories - means memoirs of individual people:
A "personal history" is simply a memory
of experiences of individual people from
a given period of time. As such, it is always
from the so-called "first hand". Therefore,
the personal history typically is very "human" -
means it reflects not only "what happened",
but also "how it felt", "what impression it
make", "what conditions prevauiled at that
time", etc., etc. Unfortunately, because
individual people see only a small fraction
of events that take place, persoanl histories
only report this small section. In turn what
happened in other place, or in the same
place but in other time, this personal
histories usually are unable to reveal.
Personal histories have also this attribute,
that if they are NOT written immediately
after a given event, then with the elapse
of time they gradually fade away the
sharpness of their details.
An example of personal history from the "battle
for Milicz" is provided in item #C1 below.
#B3.
Official history - means documentation of events developed by professional historians:
The "official history" is the one which we
can found in history textbooks. It is prepared
by professional historians on the basis of
various "official sources" (e.g. facts, written
orders, reports, official chronicles, etc.).
As such, it is "dry" - means it concentrates
mainly on events and dates, while misses
everything that enriches "personal histories" -
means misses feelings, moral lessons, motives,
circumstances, conditions, weather, appearance,
views, etc. It is worth to notice, that also the
official history NOT always must be correct
and in reality it frequently contains various
errors. For example, if the basis for describing
a given event is e.g. an order of some general
which determined target destinations and
dates, it may happen that in reality these
target destinations were NOT accomplished
in the designated dates, because e.g. the
enemy put much greater resistance than
expected, or e.g. a column of soldiers went
through a more circum-navigational path.
Furthermore, it is commonly known that
"official histories" are frequently "manipulated"
do accomplish various political goals.
An example of "official history" of the liberation
of Milicz is provided in item #C2 below.
#B4.
Folkloristic history - means the prevailing opinions of people about specific sections of the history:
The "folkloristic history" is simply the one
which people repeat to each other during
private talks and discussions. Similarly like
so-called "gossips", also every "folkloristic
history" is a product of many people. After
all, it originates from chains of repetitions
"from mouths to mouths" of a section of
historic information. Almost everyone out
of this chain of people who repeats a given
history, not only repeats what have heard
before, but also adds to this some own components
which he heard in the meantime from other
people. In the result, as the number of repetitions
is growing, also the "folkloristic history" gradually
deviates from the so-called "historic truth".
A best illustration of the mechanism of this deviation
of the "folkloristic history" from the so-called
"historic truth", is a socialising game in which
I used to take part relatively frequent. Namely,
in this game a row of people sits next to each
other. The leader of the game reads from a
paper a sentence and then whispers it to the
ear of the first person in the row. Then this
first person repeats the sentence to another
person, also whispering (so that other people
are NOT able to hear what the sentence says),
which repeats it to another in the row, etc. When
the sentence arrives to the last person in the
row, the leader of the game together with the
last person in the row, write together the final
content of this sentence on a piece of paper.
Then all have the fun comparing the content
of both pieces of paper containing the initial
and the final content of the sentence. As it
turns out, the sentence which arrived to the
end of the row typically differs significantly
from the sentence stated at the beginning of
the row. This is because in the result of numerous
repetition of this sentence, it becomes significantly
deformed - although typically still it contains
the key elements of it. Depending on the content
and emotional state of the repeating row of people,
this deformation has various character. For
example, soon after the Second World War
all people were optimists, thus deformations
had an optimistic character. In present times
people are rather pessimistic. Thus present
deformations are rather pessimistic.
Because of this tendency for deviation from so-called
"historic truth", all "folkloristic histories" have more
cultural significance than the function of chronicles.
After all, they mainly record what people of given
times felt together about a specific topic. In turn
historic facts are treated in them rather loosely.
In case of "folkloristic history" about the "battle
for Milicz", which I am quoting below, the number
of repetitions of it "from moth to mouth" amounted
to at least four people. After all, the war caused
that the inhabitants of Milicz and the vicinity were
changed into new ones in almost 100%. Also in
times when I listened to this history, almost all
eye-witnesses of the "battle for Milicz" were already
killed in the result of some mysterious "coincidents".
An example of the "folkloristic history" of the
"battle for Milicz" is provided in item #C3 below.
Moreover, practically almost the entire remaining
part of this web page, with exceptions for items
#C1 and #C2, in reality are various versions of
such "folkloristic histories".
#B5.
True history and the God's control over the past:
Amongst people with philosophical inclinations
an idea of "true history" is also used. Namely,
this "true history" supposed to be real course
of given events which people are trying to learn
and describe. Unfortunately, for people this
"true history" is never know. It is only known to
God.
In turn everything that people know is charged
with various errors. Furthermore, in recent
years undermined is even the very existence
of such "true history". The essence of this
undermining in best way expresses the following
philosophical question: "if there was a tree
in the bush which was never visited by people,
and this tree fell down when there was NO
television nor human witnesses around, then
whether this tree really existed and whether
the falling down of this tree actually did
happen?". In spite of apparent naivety
of this question, the philosophically correct
answer to it is NOT neither obvious nor easy.
For example physicists introduced even a
hypothetical animal called the
cat of Schrödinger
in order to be able to explain to students of
physics the events which occur without the
presence of witnesses.
If one things carefully about this, then the "true
history" can exist only if the
elapse of time
have just a single course (means when time runs
only in one direction - i.e. forward), and thus when
even God is unable to shift time back or forth. After
all, in case when time can be reversed and shifted
back, then God could shift time back completely
without our knowledge and then change various
details in events that already took place. In turn
when some details are changed in events that
already occurred, then there could exist such a
thing as the "true history" simply because the
history would have NOT one, but many different
versions and courses - depending after which
out of such subsequent runs of time it would be
described.
As it stems from findings of the
theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
God described on the totaliztic web page
evolution.htm - about the evolution
is in fact able to shift time back and forth. Descriptions
how this shifting time back is carried out are provided
on the web page
immortality.htm - about shifting time back, immortality, and about living forever.
What even more interesting, a body of evidence
is already accumulated, which proves that God
frequently changes events which already took
place. This evidence indicates, that changing
the past is the most frequently used by God
method of controlling the fate of people - for
details see subsection JG5.1 from volume 6 of
monograph [8e/2] "Totalizm".
Examples of evidence which proves that God
really changes the past, are presented, amongst
others, in items #D6 to #D6.1 from the web page
timevehicle.htm - about time, shifting time back, and time vehicles,
and also in subsections N7.2 and N7.3 from
volume 11 of the
monograph [1/5].
In turn such a frequent changes of events that
already took place, practically have this consequence
that the hypothetical "true history" in reality have
no right to exist. After the history which already
took place is continually subjected to changes.
In turn continual changes of events which already
happened in past, means that we people never
have the chance to describe the past without
committing significant errors in this description.
In the result, every description of history in
existence contains various significant errors
and deviations from what really have happened.
Part #C:
Representations of "historic truth" in examples of histories of the "battle for Milicz":
#C1.
The personal history of the "battle for Milicz":
By some lucky coincidence in February 2009
I was contacted by a reader of this web page -
let us refer to him with the pseudo-name
"Miliczanin-1931". He was in Milicz during
the "battle for Milicz". So he had personal
experience and memories from that battle.
The reader was born in 1931. Thus at the
time of the "battle for Milicz" he was 14 years
old. Means he was in the age when one remembers
exactly all important events. The description
of the battle for Milicz which he prepared and
posted to me is "from the first hand". I am
presenting this description below. Drawings
shown underneath were also prepared by him.
His history illustrates perfectly all key elements
of the "battle for Milicz", especially it illustrates:
the experience of Russian soldiers i battles and
their professionalism in solving the emerging
situation in comparison to arrogance of Germans
combined with their complete lack of battle
experience, the firepower advantage of
Russians over the outdated weaponry of
Germans (e.g. consider the chances of
hand-reloaded German riffles in confrontation
with automatic "pepeshas"), relatively moral
for this brutal war, and direct behaviour of
Russians in comparison to deviated intentions
of Germans, and also several further elements.
Notice that the expression "side of the
railway station" means the back of the
town-hall located on the opposite side
than the stairs by the main entrance
visible in the drawing from "Fig. #D1" below
(i.e. stairs by which Germans shot dead
the Russian emissary). Possible emails
for "Miliczanin-1931" can be directed to
me, means to the
author of this web page,
while I will redirect them to him - to respect
his anonymity. So here is the personal
history of the "battle for Milicz" described
by "Miliczanin-1931":
* * *
There was an extremely nervous atmosphere
in the town already several days before the
liberation of Milicz by the Russian army.
Frequent controls of documents by German
police, checking the "ferdunklungów" - means
the blackening of windows, so that the enemy
could not see the town. In the direction of
then Breslau (i.e. present Wrocław) marched
a stream of escapees and individual groups
of Wermacht (i.e. German army). Military
barracks in Milicz were already empty -
previously they were occupied by companies
of German cavalry. Their evacuation probably
took place at night to not cause the panic of
civilian population. Such evacuations looked
on many different ways, but always silent
and orderly ("ornung mus zein") without
yelling nor fighting.
The getting a place on a wide-span train (because
in Milicz there was also a narrow-span railway)
bordered with a miracle. The same was for a
narrow-span train. In turn the bicycle transport
was rather impossible in weather conditions
that prevailed then - i.e. deep snow and frost
over 20 degrees Celsius. This is because starting
from around 1941 all winters until around 1946
were more severe than usual. So the remaining
means of transport were sleighs and horse
wagons. But even this last mean of transport
was also not easy, as the severe frost was
solidifying grease on axels and wheels instead
of rotating were slipping along the road covered
with snow. In these years snow was not removed
from the roads. Two days proceeding the liberation
were different from previous ones in which we
were living. Tickets for food rations ceased to
be used - but generally available food was also
not there. Armed representatives of the "arbeitz-dinstu"
(soldiers) were watching queues to bakeries
to make sure that no-one got more than one
loaf of bread without a food ticket.
On the last day before the liberation, means on
21 January 1945, the central square of the town
on the side of Maltzans castle (I will describe the
directions in such manner) was covered with
suitcases, bundles, baskets - probably full of
properties of inhabitants of Militsch (i.e. present
Milicz) who counted on some doubtful miracle
in the form of authorities providing a transport,
or a casual opportunity to get a lift - as everything
was filled up fully. Between this cavalcade of
civilians, single vehicles of Wermacht drove
from time to time - which, however, would NOT
give lift to civilians. All of them were following
the main road towards Breslau (i.e. present
Wrocław).
The darkness come early - the blackout was
in power. The rest was covered in darkness.
I returned "home" on Wisenstrasse. Our "home"
at that time was one amongst these modular
wooden structures mounted on the spot from
ready-made prefabricated components then
mass-produced in factories from such materials
as wood, tar-board, glass and bricks. These
wooden structures were used in Milicz for all
possible purposes, e.g. as living compounds
for "arbeitzdinst", as a kind of "hotels" for Polish
workers and for bombed Germans from other
towns, and also for the location of German red
cross. Outside of Milicz they become famous
as barracks used for prisoners of German
concentration camps. There was around ten
such kinds of temporary designs in Milicz -
if I remember correctly. The Wisenstrasse
on which our "home" stood was located on
the peripherals of Milicz towards the direction
of railway station. It began near the building
of transformer by the famous "oaks alley",
while its extension finished on the bridge
through the stream called “Młynówka” by
the street that leads to the railway station.
On this street were also located the fire
brigade barrack and the building of so-called
"de-lousing" house - means a kind of baths
where clothes brought from concentration
camps were disinfected and washed. These
clothes were being given later to bombed
Germans who needed a material assistance.
After the return "home" I found in there the
son of German neighbour from behind the
wall (whom the leader of 3rd Reich deprived
the ownership of a cigar factory). His name
was Jochan Schultz. He was still in his
years before the conscription to army,
but he already worked as a helper to
electrical assembly men. He was with
his colleague. Both were dressed in
uniforms of "arbeitzdinst", armed in
rifles, pockets full of ammunition, but
nothing to eat. So the fate make so that
the "heren folk" needed to ask a Polish
family for a cup of hot coffee and a
couple of slices of bread. After this
begged meal they went into the dark
and frosty night no-one knows where
and for what.
The day of liberation, means Monday 22 January
1945, awakened non-typically. It was still completely
dark when in the air spread a strange tension of
uncertainty induced with some unknown sound -
neither the grunt nor buzz nor growl.
When the day already arrived and the visibility
returned, we discovered that apart from this
unknown sound an absolutely silence prevails
and there is no-one alive around - what until
that day never happened before. We went with
our father in the direction of town-centre to see
with our own eyes what actually happened. We
arrived as far as the fork of streets separation
before the town square from the direction of
Wrocław, when we encountered a tank standing
in there with a group of soldiers that were looking
at a map. After "establishing our identity" with
our hands up, and determining that we are
Polish citizens, they asked us to show on their
map in which place they just are and in which
direction lies the town of Krotoszyn. Then they
let us free while themselves drive their tank in
the direction of Krotoszyn. After we recovered
from the shock we noted that the corner shop
which existed in there has the broken wall
(probably by a shrapnel) and the entire interior
of it is splashed by something of a red-beetroot
colour - it was the effect of hitting the jar with
marmalade.
It was the first shell shot in the town during this
"battle for Milicz". It was difficult to calm down
after such meeting with the army which we did
not know, but which liberated us. We returned
"home" to share news with our mother.
However, the curiosity took better of us above the
fear, and we went again - this time in the direction
of the central square. On the square only sparse
bundles and suitcases remained after the crowds
of yesterday escapees. At the exit of the street
which in past led from side of the Barycz river,
half-body of a man lied down rolled over by
caterpillars of tanks. For the first time in my life
I saw a dead person half in a suit, the rest just
a bloody pulp on the background of a white snow.
He was the first dead in the "battle for Milicz",
while tanks individually or in groups were driving
in the direction only known to them along the exit
road from Milicz toward Krotoszyn. At the square
in Milicz these tanks were arriving by the main
road from the direction of Wrocław, or more
strictly - as I learned later - by the road from
the direction of Twardogóra which near the
church of St. Anna (i.e. just before Milicz)
is joining the road from Wrocław. Close to
the midday (because watches were NOT
so available to teenagers as today), from
the direction of Wroclaw a tank arrived
entirely covered with soldiers amongst
which there was a civilian woman. This
woman soon disappeared in a gate from
one of buildings and it was then that the
main "battle for Milicz" began. After a while
in front of the town-hall a small "tankette" drove
in. A Russian soldier with a tube like on a sailing
competition walked to the stairs of the town-hall
and started to talk something through this tube.
In the reply a shot was fired. The Russian soldier
fall dead. The remaining soldiers took him to the
tankette and then someone shoot from a German
"panzerfaust". The tankette started to burn. Its
crew died. Then events started to roll with a flashing
speed. From tanks that were passing through the
central square and that were pulling artillery guns
and mortars behind, Russian soldiers speedy
detached two artillery guns. They positioned
one such a cannon on the side of the square from
the direction of Wrocław, while the second gun on
the opposite side of the town-hall. They unloaded
several boxes of artillery ammunition and started
the shelling directly at the town-hall. Apart from
crews of these artillery guns several soldiers
with their "pepeshas" ready to shoot were
protecting the gunners and sporadically
shoot in windows of the town-hall.
The precise positioning of both these cannons
can be realised when one imagines the section
of footpath of the town-square from direction of
the railway station and moves in mind this footpath
so that it passes through the centre of the town-hall
building. On both ends of this parallel moved footpath
stood two cannons directed with their barrels at
walls of the town-hall. So one can see how shells
shot from these cannons penetrated walls of the
town-hall. When the calibre of these cannons is
concerned, I do not know much about this. In turn
the length of their barrels was around one to one
and a half of metre.
The town-hall soon started to burn. For an
explanation - as it later turned out, in the town-hall
were hidden two companies of armed "arbeitzdinst" -
i.e. at least 300 teenage Germans. After the front
of Russian passed through Milicz, these two companies
planned to come out from the hiding under the
cover of night and to kill Russian soldiers that
were to stay in Milicz, as well as kill all remaining
people from Milicz who did NOT evacuate - as
being commanded by the German authorities.
Supposedly Russian soldiers were informed
about these plans by this civilian woman who
arrived on the tank.
I wonder whether the reader knows who were the
"arbeitzdinst". These were militarised units of both
German teenage boys and girls of an older age.
The younger teenagers belonged to the "hitlerjungent".
Such units were formed as "regiments of labour"
with military training. Within boundaries of
Milicz were two such regiments. It is difficult
to determine their age and the age limit between
the "arbeitzdinst" formation and the "hitlerjungent"
formation, because teenagers then considered to
be something noble to wear uniforms of "Hitler-jungent".
But the "hitlerjungent" was the younger part of teenagers
which roughly could be described as still in the age
of "primary school". In turn "arbeitzdinst" was the
older teenagers in the period before the conscription
to army, which could be roughly described as in the
"age of Lyceum" (I do not know in what exactly age
then was the conscription to army). The "arbeitzdinst"
were uniformed into brown-greenish colour uniforms,
thus differing from "Wermacht" (i.e. German army)
the uniforms of which were in the colour, as then
it was popularly described, "feldgrau" - means rotten-green.
The symbol of "arbeitzdinst" was a rifle crossed
with a spade. One company of "arbeitzdinst" was
located in barracks near the town-council on the
edge of later sport playgrounds (presently in the
direction of hospital). The second company of
"arbeitzdinst" was located on the back of farmhouse
behind the railroad of narrow-rail train. Each of these
units accumulated at least one company of youths.
It is difficult to tell how big was such a company,
but roughly it consisted of around 150 young
persons.
By the wall of town-hall from direction of the railway
station (I am using such definition of directions as
they are more sure than geographic directions)
stood a one-storey adjusted building in which chalets
and kitchens were located. It formed a whole with
the rest of the town-hall. It was on that building that
most frequently burning "defenders" were jumping.
They probably wanted to run towards the buildings
neighbouring with the town-hall and the central square
to save themselves in that manner. But on their
path were series from "pepeshas" of soldiers that
protected shooting cannons. The town-hall burned
out. The nigh fall down. Because the wind blow in
the direction towards the railway station, and there
was the wooden barrack in which we lived, we needed
to protect it on the roof from igniting because piles of
burning documents the fire from town-hall was lifting
up into the air, and then they rained fire onto our
home.
By the morning everything got quiet. Again the
curiosity got better of us and it overcome the fear.
We needed to satisfy it and go to the town square
to see the destruction. There was no army. The
town-hall fire was at the last breath. On the footpath
of the central square, from side of the railway station
around fifteen bodies were lying down covered
with snow. All of them lied on their stomachs -
probably when running they tripped on the edge
of footpath and so collapsed. All of them were
males in the teenagers' age dressed in uniforms
of "arbeitzdinst". In this way the "battle for Milicz"
ended.
With regards - eye witness of these several hours
from the history of Milicz from sixty-four years ago.
* * *
The reader "Miliczanin-1931" enclosed three
illustrations together with his descriptions.
Unfortunately, to these illustrations applies
what "Miliczanin-1931" expressed beautifully
in his email to the author of this web page,
quote: "While sharing my recalls regarding
Milicz, I do not pretend to be a chronicler or
a historian. I am an amateur who is playing
with computer, internet, and present modern
devices as printers and scanners, and I treat
them as a kind of "hobby". This causes that
I do not invest in this my "hobby", and devices
which I utilise for a "fun" originate from
junk of the younger generation. This in turn
is reflected by the age of this equipment -
and thus also by the quality of whatever I am
creating with the aid of it (the equipment is
already several years old). To my grandchildren
I turn for an assistance only in critical moments
of "technical hopelessness" - because being
78 years old I am a kind of exception going
into these bytes, scans, and other folders."
Bearing the above in mind I decided NOT to
force readers to the compulsory reviewing
drawings of "Miliczanin-1931" through the
presentation of these drawings as permanent
Figures which would ornament this web page.
However, if the reader has no objections against
viewing illustrations of relatively low quality of drawing
and scanning, then can view these through clicking
on green heading at the beginning of descriptions
to each one of them. So here are these three
illustrations to the "battle for Milicz" prepared
in person by "Miliczanin-1931" and make available
for viewing by interested readers.
The plan of the balle in the centre of Milicz (click on this "green" writing to see that plan of the battle).
Plan of the "battle for Milicz". The direction
of geographical north (i.e. the direction to town
Krotoszyn) coincides with the upper frame
of this plan. The "side of the railway station"
coincides with the right hand of the person
viewing this plan, in turn the "side of the Maltzan
palace (margrave’s palace)" coincides with
the left hand of the person viewing this plan.
On this plan were shown all objects which
are mentioned in my description, for example
the central square and town-hall from Milicz,
the path of Russian tanks through this square,
the stairs at the main entrance to the town-hall
and the location of burned tankette, the position
of both cannons that shelled the town-hall, and
the location of the barrack in which we lived then.
The appearance (up) and interior (down) of the barrack in which "Miliczanin-1931" lived in 1945 (click on this "green" writing to see that barrack).
The marking of compartments in this barrack
(see the lower part of the plan): A, B, C - the
German family Schultz, D - the living quarters
of my parents, E - hotel for Polish workers that
travelled to Milicz, F - another Polish family.
To see the location of such barracks in Milicz,
in this number the location of the barrack which
stands in Milicz until today, see the map from
next illustration.
The map of Milicz before the World War Two (click on this "green" writing to see that map).
Notice that in German the present Milicz was
called "Militsch". This map was printed in 1928
on the basis of documents from 1890. It reflects
quite well the plan of this town in 1945, i.e. in time
of the "battle for Milicz". The enlarged dots mark
the location in Milicz of six barracks of the design
shown above. It is worth to notice that one amongst
these historic war barracks stands in Milicz until
today. It is the barrack which stands by the railway
station. In years 1960s it was used as a hall for
youth that travelled to schools in Milicz by trains.
Because it is related to similar barracks used by
Germans in concentration camps, at present it
has already a significant historical value.
(a)
(b)
Fig. #C1ab: The appearance of the town-hall from Milicz presented
on German postcards issued in 1936. (Courtesy "Miliczanin-1931".)
The above photographs are probably last photos of that town-hall,
taken before it was burned in January 1945.
(Click on the selected photograph to see it enlarged or to shift it to other area on the screen.)
Fig. #C1a (left):
The frontal view of the town-hall. It was here that events
took place which are described in item #C1 of this web page.
Fig. #C1b (right):
The appearance of entrance stairs to the town-hall.
It was under these stairs that the Russian "tankette"
arrived with emissaries that suggested the surrender
to underage "defenders" of this townall. It was also
by that stairs that the Russian emissary was shod
dead by Germans while his tankette was burned
with a German "panzerfaust".
Fig. #C2:
Appearance of the central square and town-hall from
Milicz, captured in the overhead view looking from east towards
west. (From German postcard of 1936, courtesy "Miliczanin-1931".)
In the building of town-hall clearly visible are these
public toilets on its eastern side, which low-located
roof tempted young German "defenders" of Milicz
in their attempts to run for life during bombardment of
the town-hall by Russian cannons - as this is described
in item #C1 above. The actual existence of these
toilets with low roof, documented on this photograph,
confirms the truth and correctness of the report from
item #C1 above. (The report from item #C1 was
prepared and published in February 2009, while the
above photograph was found and scanned only in
May 2010.)
It is worth to notice on the above photograph, that
at the moment when it was taken the airplane which
took it was located approximately above the historic
"small church" of Milicz (under the invocation of
Saint Michael Archangel), described in item #28
from a separate web page named
milicz_uk.htm,
and also in item #C1 of the web page named
sw_andrzej_bobola_uk.htm.
In fact, the asymmetrical deformation of the ideally
square central place of Milicz, visible above in the
right-low corner (means in north-east corner), is a
remain of the first location of this historically oldest
church and cemetery of Polish Milicz. After all, in
the original design the central square of Milicz had
in its north-east corner a small place with the church
and the cemetery, similar to the square and church
of St. Elisabeth which until today exist in the north-west
corner of the central square of the Polish city named
Wrocław.
#C2.
The official history of the "battle for Milicz":
Here is an example of just such official
description of the liberation of Milicz presented
in the book [1#C2] by Ryszard Majkowski
"Dolny Śląsk", 1945 WYZWOLENIE:
* * *
"4th Panzer Army commanded by general-lieutenant
D. Leluszenko, attacked with its main forces along the
left side of the Barycz river. On the right wing of this
army attacked the 6th Mechanised Corpse (commanded
by colonel W. Orlów), while on the left 10th Panzer
Corpse (commanded by colonel N. Czuprow). On
21 January 1945 soldiers of general Leluszenko
liberated Ostrzeszów and Milicz.
"
#C3.
Folklore history of the "battle for Milicz":
There was a beautiful sunny day. The air
was infiltrated with smell of life and hope.
In such a beautiful day it is particularly
unpleasant to die. An absolute calm reigned
around. Almost all inhabitants of Milicz (then
called "Militsch") and neighbouring villages already
have run away towards the western side of
Germany. In turn these sparse ones which
thought that they are Poles, and therefore
remained on the spot, sat in houses scared,
hiding in their cellars. For some reasons supposedly
even birds got silent as if in an expectation
of some incoming tragedy. After some time
in that absolute calm a distant roaring of
tens of tank engines started to rumble,
as it slowly approached Milicz from the
southern direction. Just this roaring alone
must suffice already in order to make
heart attack in these weakest in nature.
Some time later these tanks roared and
rumbled along streets of Milicz. Soon
later one could hear a deafening explosion
of the German "iron-clad fist" ("Panzerfaust").
After this explosion desperate cries of several
Russians could be heard as they were
baked alive not able to exit the burning
tank. A black pillar of tar smoke has
shot up over the centre of Milicz from
a burning tank. The deafening roaring
of tanks for a moment has declined as
if to a whisper after this explosion.
It make an impression of a group of
monsters getting together and debating
what to do next. However, soon later
tanks again started to roar, gradually
spreading over streets of Milicz and
encircling around the town-hall. Suddenly
all of them started to shoot. Booms
of their guns almost merged together.
Simultaneously the town-hall burst
into flames set afire by Russian soldiers
who ignited it with flame throwers
after they come closer and shot at it
from apartment-houses located at the
southern side of the central town-square.
The town-hall fast turned to rubbles
and begin to collapse. A moment later
calm started to reign. Even tanks silenced
their engines. These silence was then
interrupted by several long series of
shots from Russian "pepesha" (PPSh-41, see "Fig. #E2" below),
and by sad cry of dying young Germans,
whom bullets did not kill at once. However,
several single pistol shots cut out soon
even these cries of young Germans.
The most horrifying was in it all, that
these young people from both combat sides,
who have been killing each other in Milicz,
actually were as all of us, means they
loved somebody, were loved by somebody,
they had their dreams and hopes, they
had looked to the future optimistically,
etc. If they have faced each other in other
times or in other conditions, almost for
sure they would become and stay friends.
However, the political ambitions of their
leaders, as well as
diabolic forces
that presently control our planet, have
caused that instead of live and let others
live, they have been forced to kill and
to be killed. Let us consider for a
moment, who really pushes people to murder
their follows. Are these other people, or
leaders-changelings
who operate on Earth on the behalf of these
diabolic creatures in the power of which
the Earth stays today, and which for
centuries were called devils, serpents,
Satan, bad witches, etc., while recently
are called
UFOnauts.
After all, if one carefully examines photographs
of leaders from the period of the Second World
War, than almost all of them had their hair
growing upwards on their heads -
which the anatomical detail is NOT at all
typical for humans populating the Earth.
If you still have any doubts who hide behind
this whole evil on heaping on the Earth,
you should read about UFOnauts from the
web pages
military_magnocraft.htm,
bandits.htm,
katowice_uk.htm,
predators.htm, or
ufo.htm,
and many other pages similar to these ones.
Part #D:
The folkloristic description of the course of battle
for the town-hall in Milicz:
As this is explained in item #B4 above, folkloristic
histories and descriptions typically state how
people imagined that something has happened,
NOT how something really has happened. After
all, such descriptions are coined when a chain
of people repeats a given history mouth-to-mouth,
while each one of them adds to it some his or her
impressions. In the result, such folkloristic descriptions
more reflect what people "feel" about a given topic
than what is really a historic truth about this topic.
This is especially valid for the history of Milicz,
because after the World War Two practically
almost no eyewitnesses of these events
remained in Milicz. In this part, as well as in
further parts of this web page, provided are
examples of just such folkloristic descriptions.
These descriptions I have heard during my
childhood and I am repeating them here.
It is worth to notice how much different these
are from the report of eyewitness (an example
of which I presented in item #C1 above), and
also from the official history represented by the
example from item #C2 above.
#D1.
The townhall in Milicz:
Before the war Milicz had an interesting
town-hall. The appearance of it is shown in
photographs from "Fig. #D1" of this web page
(which is the repetition of the photograph
"Fig. #28" from web page about the town of
Milicz.)
Unfortunately, this town-hall was destroyed
during the liberation of Milicz by the Red
Army.
Fig. #D1:
The appearance of the town-hall from Milicz, build
in 1851.
(This illustration is a repetition of the
illustration "Fig. #28" from the web page about the town of
Milicz.)
This town-hall was destroyed during the "battle for Milicz"
in final days of the Second World War. At that time Milicz
was being taken by the Russian army of major Lagin,
while in the town-hall young soldiers of Hitler barricade
themselves. During my childhood ruins of this town-hall
still were the most prominent component of the Milicz
central square. In turn the underground tunnels that led
to this town-hall from the fortified castle in Milicz, were
still in good state even in times when I attended my
Lyceum, i.e. in 1960 to 1964. It was near this town-hall
that from underground tunnels numerous entrances led
to underground prison cells in which in medieval times
countless people were imprisoned or walled up alive - if
they were inconvenient for authorities of the Milicz township.
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site. For this, it suffices to click
on this illustration. Furthermore, most of the internet browsers that you may
use, including the popular "Internet Explorer",
allow also to download each illustration
to your own computer, where it can be looked at, reduced or enlarged to the
size that you may want, or printed with your own graphical software.
#D2.
The German garrison in Milicz:
The German garrison that defended Milicz
was composed of just juvenile boys aged
around 16. As it was repeated after the war,
in the final phase of the war Hitler gave some
barbaric order that every male in the age of
16 to 60 years has to defend the Third Reich
until the last droplet of his own blood, otherwise
he will be executed. This order may shock at
present, considering the latest findings that
ordering others to fight to the death, Hitler
himself just escaped from punishment and
responsibility. After all, the recent genetic
research of the scull which supposedly
originated from Hitler, revealed that Hitler
only simulated his own suicide, so that he
could easier escape from Berlin in last days
of the war and live later cosily hidden in
some forgotten part of the world - for more
details see the article "Skull tests reignate
theories Hitler escaped bunker" from page
A14 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Monday, September 28,
2009. Of course, these males which were
older than 16, for a long time served
already in the German army. Thus such
16 years old boys conscripted and left to
defend Milicz, were more suitable to play scouts
than to enter the military service. A significant
proportion of these juvenile boys in German
uniforms were pupils of initial classes of the
Lyceum of General Education in Milicz
shown below in photograph from "Fig. #D2"
(which is a repetition of the photograph
"Fig. #30" from the web page about the town of
Milicz.)
They were conscripted to the army, because
in this Lyceum was left practically no-one that
could serve in the army. After all, their colleagues
from older years were conscripted to the Hitler's
army already much earlier, while in that last
stage of the war their corpses for a long time
were scattered on battlefields of the Eastern
or Western Front. The Germans who were
defeated on all fronts simultaneously, trained
fast these boys in shooting and frantically fast
wore them into German military uniforms. In
turn after they were already in uniforms, similarly
as all other people serving in the German army,
they were subject to being shot dead immediately
if they refuse to take part in a battle.
Fig. #D2: The
Lyceum of General Education
No 1 in Milicz. It is this lyceum that I (i.e. Dr Eng.
Jan Pajak) had the honour to attend and finish.
(This illustration is a repetition of the illustration
"Fig. #30" from the web page about the town of
Milicz.)
The majority of German "soldiers" that confronted
in Milicz the attacking Red Army, were juvenile
pupils of the initial classes of that particular lyceum.
They were juvenile, inexperienced, and badly
prepared to the battle. In turn their thoughtless
leader choose the position for the battle which
was the worse of all possible positions. It deprived
the possibility of tactical withdrawal in case of an
unfortunate turn of events. In turn such a hopeless
position changed their defence into a suicidal mission.
In total their resistance was completely senseless,
while their fate was actually a sure death verdict
issued to them by their own commanders.
A huge symbolic meaning have also the place
in which the execution of these juvenile defendants
of Milicz in German uniforms took place.
To be shot dead they were lined against the wall
of a building which their families used earlier for
storing animal carrion. Although Russian soldiers
who carried out this execution surely had no
idea what this building was used for, still by
some command of the fate they led the German
juveniles straight under the wall of that particular
animal mortuary. (This "animal mortuary" stood
on the eastern side of Milicz town in quite a
distance from the first buildings of this town -
so that the stink of it would NOT disturb
citizens.) In the time when German juveniles
realised that they are going to be shot dead,
through their minds probably passed thoughts
of the kind "I will die now shot dead like an
animal, while my body will rot nearby like
animal carcasses." The disgraceful meaning
of just such their deaths compared only with
the symbolism of the lack of dignity in deaths
which their own country prepared earlier to
military prisoners taken captivity by German
armies.
Considering the tragic fate of juvenile "defendants
of Milicz" in German military uniforms, we should
be also aware, that if they refuse to obey the order
to join the German army, they would also be
shot dead "for desertion" - but this time by their
own countrymen. In the last phase of the war
Hitler issued an order that every German male
who refuses this indiscriminate conscription to the
army must be immediately shot dead without
any martial court. Thus, just such a situation
in which were placed these juvenile defendants
of Milicz - when no matter what they would decide
to do, in every case a death awaited for them,
incline us to seriously reconsider whether a
conscription to an army is legal in the light
of laws that prevail on the Earth - as this is
discussed in item #F3 of the web page
memorial.
(For sure conscription - means a compulsory
army service, runs against commandments of the
moral laws.)
#D3.
How folklore described the battle for the town-hall in Milicz:
Now is a turn to report the "folkloristic history"
of the defence of Milicz town-hall. In times of
my youth I have heard this history as it was
repeated by old people from Wszewilki. When
it is compared to the eyewitness report from
item #C1 of this web page - means with the
information from so-called "first hand", then
one clearly sees that because of the discrepancies
this folkloristic history has more cultural and
curious value, then that of a real report.
One should NOT be surprised of this. After
all, when this history arrived to my ears, usually
it contained information from at least so-called
"fourth hand", while sometimes even from
"fifth hand" or "sixth hand". The reason was that
until that time in Wszewilki has NOT survived even
a single eyewitness of the events. By then all
autochthones were killed - as this is described
in item #G1 from this web page, and also in
items #E1 and #E2 from the web page
wszewilki_uk.htm - about the history and curiosities of the village Wszewilki.
Thus actually this history was already then
quite deformed because of subsequent
repetitions during passing it from mouth-to-mouth.
Ss here is this folkloristic history - as I
remember it today:
* * *
According to folklore stries, the German
garrison of teenage "soldiers", which intended
to defend Milicz, took its position in the
town-hall of Milicz. Thus, when the Red Army
corpse led by the major Lagin entered
Milicz, these young boys, commanded by an
officer that was equally young and inexperienced
like them, barricaded themselves inside of the
town-hall of Milicz. But the position which they
took for defence from the military point of view
was hopeless. After all, it disallowed them a tactical
withdrawal in case when they were confronted
by overwhelming forces of the enemy. Thus such
wrong position transformed their defence into
a suicidal mission. When the first Russian tank
entered the town-square of Milicz, these juvenile
"defenders" of the town shoot to it with the "iron-clad fist"
("Panzerfaust"). The tank was burned, blocking
later for a long time the entrance to the town-square
from a side street. The crew of this tank was
fried alive inside. It is buried in Milicz in a place
that someone show me in the past, but which
presently I forgotten where it was exactly. Only
thing that I remember, is that I was wondering
then how it happened that Russians were buried
in that particular place - as somehow this place
looked unfit for them. Of course, after realizing
that the town-hall of being defended, Russians
immediately surrounded it from all sides and
flooded with fire and led. Russian soldiers with
fire-throwers managed to get very close to the
town-hall, taking positions in the houses that
were neighbouring the town-hall from the southern
side of the town-square. From that positions they
treated the town-hall with streams of fire. Russian
fire-throwers and powerful tank guns from tens of
tanks caused, that within around a half of hour
the entire town-hall was collapsing while everything
in it was burning. German juveniles locked in
that town-hall received a good taste of what their
older colleagues less than 6 years earlier served
to Polish soldiers on the Westerplatte and in the
Gdansk post office. But they had no much time
to contemplate the action of the
moral laws,
because their inexperienced and unused to battles
officer surrender them immediately after the town-hall
started to burn and they were endangered to be
roasted alive. Unfortunately for them, the mechanised
column of Russian tanks that captured Milicz had
no transport nor provision for prisoners of war.
Its task was to make a quick punch forward and
close the break in the encircling of German army,
not taking care of surrounding Germans. In addition
Russians had freshly in minds all these atrocities
that Germans committed on prisoners of war that
they took before. Therefore, immediately after
surrounding to Russians, these juveniles from
Milicz wearing German uniforms were let outside
of the town, by the line of empty trenches that
run the eastern side of the town. In that times
by the trenches stood a brick building of the
knackers' mortuary, means a kind of empty barn
in which at these difficult times the surrounding farmers
were storing dead animals (these animals were
later taken from the building by knackers to be
converted into soap). Russians lined these juvenile
boys in Hitler's military uniforms beside this
knackers' mortuary, and treated them with a long
series from pepesha. Even several years later still
on bricks of this knackers' mortuary one could see
a row of bullet holes which illustrated the height at
which this pepesha was pointed. The place of death
of these boys in a sense was a kind of symbolic
return of karma for what Hitler's armies used to
do to other captured soldiers and civilians several
years earlier. After all, these juvenile German
"soldiers" from Milicz were dying in the place in
which only slightly earlier their own families gathered
dead animals. They also were shot dead in a
similar manner as their older colleagues from
German army used to shoot to their prisoners
of war. Russians had also no time to burry them
properly. After shooting them, they simply thrown
them into an empty trench nearby, the digging of
which probably was earlier done by the same
boys. Then along this trench a heavy Russian
tank went in a zigzag, collapsing the top part of
the trench and burying bodies of Germans by
a shallow layer of soil. In the result, their decaying
bodies could be dug out still in times when I
went to the primary school. Their decaying remains
were mixed with ammunition pouches full of German
rounds, and sometimes even with remains of their
weapon and equipment.
Part #E:
The technology and war machines which decided about the "battle for Milicz":
#E1.
Tanks which decided about the "battle for Milicz":
The course of the "battle for Milicz", the army
which was liberating Milicz, and also the phase
of the war when this battle was fought - all these
were decided by Russian tanks.
Let us have a look now how these Russian tanks
looked like, and also how looked like other basic
tanks that took part in that war. Photographs of
these tanks were taken in 2007 and 2009.
#E1.1.
The Russian tank "T-34":
In Poland the Russian tank "T-34" is well
known. After all, for many years after the
World War Two, it was also the main tank
of the Polish army. Because in Poland
many people adhere to the rule that they
"prise others, while unappreciate their
own", many Poles are ignorant of the operational
advantages of this tank. On the other hand,
all wars in which this tank took part confirmed
in practice, that all operational parameters
of Russian tanks, which are vital in battles,
always are superior in comparison to
similar parameters of other tanks. In turn
when the Second World War is concerned,
then even the most biased experts have
serious difficulties with avoiding to acknowledge,
that the Russian tanks "T-34" were then the
best tanks in the world, and in reality these
were them that won that war.
Fig. #E1.1:
The above photograph shows a tank named T-34
from the Soviet Army. The person photographed
with it is me, i.e. Dr Jan Pajak. Such T-34 tanks
were ones which won the Second World War.
Just such tanks like the above one were
rolling over streets of Milicz during the
"battle of Milicz". Folklore stories claim
that just such a tank was destroyed with
an "iron-clad fist" ("Panzerfaust") at
the moment when it was entering the
central square of Milicz. The burned
skeleton of it was supposedly later
haunting for some time at the entrance
to Milicz central square in a small street
that leads fo the square from the castle.
In turn the crew of it, which was
burned alive, rests buried in Milicz.
(Click on this photograph to see it enlarged.)
The Soviet tank T-34 turned out to
be the best tank of the Second World War.
In fact, in connection with an extremely
effective strategy of the utilization of
this tank applied by the Russian Army,
it was it that won the World War Two.
The strategy of Soviet Army in applying
this tank depended on very fast breaking
the front by two powerful columns of such
tanks which carried infantry on their backs,
and surrounding with them a section of
German army. When both columns meet each
other some distance behind the German
front, they closed the circle and then
completely annihilated all Germans that
happened to be inside of this encircling.
For this reason, through such a systematic
use of this strategy of punching two holes
in German front, tightly surrounding with
tanks a section of German army, and
finally annihilating completely all
Germans inside of the encircled "cauldron",
soon Germans ceased to have sufficient
numbers of soldiers on the Eastern Front
to defend themselves effectively. So this
Eastern Front soon become known to Germans
as a kind of "black hole" into which continually
were send new soldiers, in order to soon
disappear in it forever. As we also know,
in the second stage of the war German
soldiers who received the marching orders
to the Eastern Front, treated these orders
as a death verdict for themselves.
In turn the strategy of Allied Forces was
outdated and failed completely to utilize the
speed, operability, nor the breaking power
of tanks. Namely Allied Forces were attacking
Germans along a linear front, pushing them
out simultaneously along the entire front.
But in principle they did NOT surround
nor annihilate Germans. Thus tanks in Allied
Forces were used similarly like recently
in Iraq - means similarly like a self-propelled
guns and machine guns with their own shield
which protected crews against fire of small
calibre. Because of this low-efficiency
of the strategy, relatively small German
forces of the Western Front were able
engage and hold back the entire Allied
Army, preventing this army from liberating
the Europe.
Tanks "T-34" shown above went into the
serial production in 1936. They weighted
32 tons. Each one of them was 6.1 meter
long, 3 meters wide, and 2.45 meter high.
Each was crewed by 5 men. The maximal
speed of it is 56 km/h. Range 186 km (115
miles). It has 85 millimetre
gun, with the range of effective firing 3 050
meters. It also has a whole array of technical
innovations which additionally increased
its advantage and its effectiveness.
For example, all side surfaces of the
shield were slanted. Thus they deflected
incoming bullets. So in order to destroy
it, it was necessary to hit precisely into
one of its weak spots, which were rather
sparse, e.g. between its corps and the
tower. Its shield was grooved sharply -
so that it make impossible the sticking
of magnetic mines. The design of it was
simple and reliable. Thus it was breaking
down rarely and was easy to repair. Almost
in every aspect it was superior technically
over other tanks of its times. The book
[1#E1.1] by George Forty, "World
War Two Tanks" (Osprey 1995, ISBN 1-85532-532-2)
provides quantitative data on the number of
tanks produced during the war by subsequent
countries. According to data from pages 166
and 170 of that book, over 40,000 tanks T-34
were produced by the Soviet Union during
that war.
#E1.2.
The American tank "Sherman" M4:
When on the eastern front Russian tanks
annihilated numerous armies of Hitler from
Moscow till far beyond Berlin, on the western
front American "gas-guzzlers" called "Sherman"
M4 were trying to scare Germans with roar
of their powerful engines. Here is how these
American tanks looked-like.
Fig. #E1.2: The American tank M4A3E8 Sherman.
The person photographed with it is also me,
i.e. Dr Jan Pajak.
(Click on this photograph to see it enlarged.)
It was widely used by the Allied Forces on the
Western Front of the World War Two. But because
of the outdated strategy of Allied Forces, this
tank did NOT perform a leading role in
winning the war. In time when Soviet tanks
systematically annihilated German forces
on the area from Moscow till well behind
Berlin, Allied Forces hardly managed
to push out Germans from several small
countries located at the western edge
of the Europe.
Tanks Sherman had rather a bad opinion. During
the Second World War many tanks Sherman
were "given" to Russia within the frame of war
assistance. But Russian tankers resisted as they
could to be assigned to this tank, as they considered
it to be a kind of self-propelled, motorised coffin.
A similarly low opinion about tanks Sherman
had both the soldiers of Western allies, as well
as Germans. Germans used to call it the
"Tommy cooker". The reason was that in soldiers’
slang Germans referred to British as to "Tommys".
In turn Sherman tanks had this tendency to
ignite easily and to cook its crew inside -
means cook Tommys. Similarly English soldiers
also had quite a derogatory name "Ronson"
for Sherman tanks. This is because the name
"Ronson" had in those times a popular petrol
lighter, the producers of which used the slogan
"lights first time, every time" - means which
lighter behaved like Sherman tanks hit by
German missiles. It is worth to add, that a
significant amount of information about this
bad opinion of Sherman tanks can be found
in internet after putting key words Ronson or
Tommy cooker to any search engine (e.g. to
google.com ).
The tank "Sherman" M4 weighted 34 tons.
It was 7.5 meter long, 3 meters wide, and 3.43
meters in height. It was crewed by 5 men.
The maximal speed of it was 48 km/h. It had
the road range of 161 km. It had 76 mm
gun. But it was relatively easy to destroy.
It was the tallest amongst mass produced
tanks that took part in that war, thus was
also the easiest to hit (for tanks works the
principle that the lower they are the more
difficult to aim at them and hit them in
motion - and thus they are more difficult
to be destroyed).
The shield of it had many vertical
surfaces, thus it was susceptible to
penetration by cumulative charges.
The smooth surface of the shield make
it easy for magnetic mines to stick to
it. The complicated design decreased
the reliability and extended durations
of repairs. Large consumption of fuel
limited its operational capabilities. In
the result of this huge fuel consumption,
Sherman tanks used to significantly slow
down the speed and flexibility of the entire
offensive of Western allies, as supplying
these tanks into fuel always created an
immense strategic problem. Because of
this, the war on the Western front needed
to be so carried out, that it was suiting
these tanks, instead of the use of these
tanks suiting the war. Thus, although
this tank looked impressive, in the
military sense it was just a "sitting duck"
which awaited to be shot. According to
data contained on page 126 of the
abovementioned book [1#E1.1], in
years 1942 to 1944 (i.e. during the
World War Two) the USA produced
in total 49234 tanks Sherman M4.
#E1.3.
The British tank "Valentine":
Here is the British tank called "Valentine V"
from June 1942. It also took part in the
Second World War fighting on the western
front.
Fig. #E1.3: Myself, i.e. Dr Jan Pajak,
photographed with the British tank "Valentine V"
from 1942. This tank was a basic tank of the British
army. It was produced by the Vickers Amstrong
Ltd., Engineers Newcastle upon Tyne. In years
1940 to 1944 constructed were 6 855 such
Valentine tanks in the UK, and further over one
and half thousands in Canada - out of which
almost all (apart for 30 kept for educational
purposes), were send to Russia.
(Click on this photograph to see it enlarged.)
Amongst all tanks used in large number on fronts
of the Second World War, many considered this
tank to be the worse one. It was slow,
had many weak spots, and was relatively easy
to be destroyed. Its weaponry was miserable.
For example it is known that Russian tankers
resisted as they could to be assigned to this
tank, or to American "Shermans", because
they considered them to be "motorised coffins".
(During the Second World War almost the
entire Canadian production of these tanks,
means 1390 of them, were "send" to Russia
within the frame of the war assistance.) In
addition, it was produced in an many as 11
different design versions and in a whole range
of further applications (e.g. as self-propelled
guns or as fire throwers). These versions
frequently breakdown (failed to work) - while each
one of them required numerous spare parts which
were different from these for other versions.
Thus this tank did NOT play any vital role in
the winning the Second World War. The only
situation in which it become useful, were
battles in narrow streets of towns. This is because
its barrel was shorter than its corpse, and also
because of its small size, it was able to manoeuvre
in narrow streets, shoot in there sideways, and
even turn back on slightly wider streets.
Sending to fronts such shabby tank by a former
superpower (i.e. by Great Britain) until today induces
an embarrassment. For this reason about this tank
is almost no information in the official war literature.
The only place in which I found some sparse
description of the performance of Valentine tanks,
is the book [1#E1.3] by Robert Kershaw, entitled
"Tank Men" (Hodder & Stoughton, 2008, ISBN 978-0-340-92347-4).
So here is several quotations from that book about
British tanks Valentine. Page 155:
"More causalities came from breakdown and
from problems with the supply of spares than
from enemy action." Page 221: "... unfortunately
armed with a piddling little 2-pounder pop-gun
and Besa machine gun. British tank crews had
already realised it was 'bloody useless' against
50 mm long-barrelled Panzer Mark III... British
tank crews felt exposed in their vulnerable tanks.
Hamilton summed it up as 'really like being a
lightweight in the ring with a heavyweight'. German
tanks were 10 mph faster and had five-man
crews against British three or four." Page 371:
... Valentines and Shermans were coffins."
The tank "Valentine V" weighted 17 tons. It was
6.68 meter long (i.e. 17ft9in), 2.64 meter wide
(i.e. 8ft7.5in), and 2.27 meter high (i.e. 7ft5.5in).
Its maximal speed amounted to 24 km/h. The range
(after a single tanking) was 145 kilometres. It had
4 crew members. Its armour in the thickest place
was 60 mm. It was armed in 75mm/2.95in gun
(tzw. two-pounder "2 pdr"), and in the coaxial
machine gun Besa 7.7mm/0.303in.
#E1.4.
The German tank "Panther":
After writing about tanks which won the
Second World Was, it is also worth to
described the tank which lost this war -
briefly describing its performance. So
here is the best German tank from time
of the Second World War called the
"Panther" (click on this "green" message in order to see this tank).
While writing about tanks which won the
Second World War, it is worth to show
also a tank that lost this war -
informing briefly "why". So here it is,
the most perfect German tank from times
of World War Two, called Panther.
Similarly like it was with allies armies,
also Germans were unable to utilize fully
the military benefits of this tank. After
all, the entire their strategy of using
tanks was based on experiences from battles
of World War One. In addition to the out-dated
and inadequate strategy of using this tank,
it had also many drawbacks. For example
it was too "tall" (54 cm taller from the
Russian tank T-34) - and thus more easy
to hit. It was slow - what turned out
to be fatal in races along huge spaces
of Russia. It was also "fragile" - and
thus did NOT perform well in difficult
environmental conditions. The design of
it was very complicated and contained
many unnecessary parts - thus repairs of
it were long, while a number of spare
parts which it required - large. It also
had a number of "weak spots".
The construction of tank "Panther" initiated
in 1942 with the intention of replacing
with it the predecessors "Panzer IV" and
"Panzer III" which under every aspect
turned out to be militarily and technically
clumsy and inferior. Until the end of war
produced were around 4800 these tanks
"Panther". It weights 44.8 tons. It is
6.87 meter long, 3.42 meter wide, and
2.99 meter tall. It is crewed by 5 men.
The maximal speed of it is 46 km/h. It
has a cannon of 75 mm with range of 3 km.
(But from a distance of 3 km its shots
were unable to penetrate the armour of
T-34 and bounced from Russian tanks.)
It was relatively easy to destroy. The
armour of it had several almost vertical
surfaces which would not bounce bullets.
The smooth surface facilitated the
sticking of magnetic mines. The complicated
design decreased its reliability and
extended repairs. Slow speed limited
its operational capabilities on huge
spaces of Russia. So in spite that it
was the best development from the entire
family of five subsequent improvements
of the German tanks, still it was very
inferior in comparison to its main opponent -
Russian tank T-34 (from the photo above).
#E2.
Personal weapon of figting sides, means "pepesha" machine guns against hand-reloaded, single-shot rifles:
In spite of natural for Germans technical
genius, in the Second World War the quality
of personal weapons of Germans was
decisively inferior in comparison to the
quality of Russian personal weapons.
For example, Germans tried to win the
war with the help of a hand reloaded,
single shot rifles which were designed
almost a half of century earlier! But it
turned out that such rifles were useful
only in shooting to unarmed prisoners.
However, when confronting Russian
soldiers armed with excellent "pepesha"
machine guns, this single shot rifles
gave almost no chances to Germans
to survive these confrontations.
Fig. #E2:
The machine gun of the Russian army
PPSh-41
from times of the Second World War. It was
known under a popular name "pepesha".
It was just from such a "pepesha" that were
executed the young "defenders of Milicz"
in German military uniforms, which in 1945
barricaded themselves in the townhall from
Milicz and then burned the first Russian
tank that entered the Milicz town square.
It was also such "pepeshas" that in fact
turned out to be one amongst components
of the weaponry of the Red Army that decided
about the winning of the Second World War
by Russians.
The Russian "pepesha" was the weapon the
construction of which by Russians was inspired
by a similar weapon of the Finish production,
originally called
Konepistooli m/31 Suomi (Suomi M-31 SMG) -
see the web page about
Finish weapons and history of Finish-Soviet wars.
That Finish automatic weapon (i.e. the ancestor of
"pepesha") was designed in 1931 by Aimo Lahti
and used very effectively by Finish army during the
Finish-Soviet "winter war" in years 1939-1940. In
this war Russians still used only hand loaded
rifles. So they were bitten so effectively by the
Finish ancestor of pepesha, that on the basis
of several conquered samples of this weapon
they produced their own version of this effective
machine gun and introduce it to the mass
equipment of their army already since 1941.
In turn Germans had NO previously any
defeat from an enemy that had a highly effective
hand machine guns. Although in September 1939
they were significantly roughed up by the Polish
infantry which used a lot of RKMs Browning
model 1928 (originally made in Belgium),
but German won this war - thus they did NOT
feel endangered by this kind of automatic weaponry.
So to war with Russia they went equipped
mainly into a hand-loaded rifles
"Mauser" (Karabiner 98k)
designed still in 1898. Although some German
soldiers had machine pistols called "MP40" or
Schmeisser,
but this pistol in military sense was hugely
inferior to pepesha and had a lot of technical
drawbacks. For example, the distance of
deadly fire was for it just 200 metres (for
pepesha it was 500 metres), its cartridge
frame had 32 rounds (the drum of pepesha
had 71 rounds). Also it frequently jammed.
Thus the pepesha and the deadly stream
of led that it spread in the range of to 500
metres, turned out to Germans quite an
unpleasant surprise. Also in spite that various
more aware Germans started then frantically
work on their own version of machine gun
which would represent an effective counter-balance
for the Russian "pepesha", for a whole array
of strange reasons triggered by the action
of so-called
moral laws
(e.g. streams of erroneous beliefs of Hitler,
bureaucracy, court orders, etc. - see item
#I2 below) their efforts got complicated.
This machine gun Germans developed
only in 1943. They called it
MP43,
or "Machine Pistol 43". However, to the
common use they introduced this machine
gun only ion the last phase of the war -
when their defeat become decided by
"pepesha" and by tanks "T-34".
(By the way, this German machine pistol
"MP43", which Germans managed to
introduce only in the last stage of the
war, was also intercepted and appreciated
by Russians, while after small improvements
it becomes an ancestor for the famous and
extremely effective
AK-47,
(i.e. “Kalashnikov") - which until today
is spreading huge fear and destruction
amongst enemies of these ones who use it.)
It is worth to notice, that every weapon, in this
number also the above pepesha, looks approximately
like a lizard - if it is looked at from the direction
of being shot at. This probably is why the New
Zealand Maoris the magical weapon of the
UFOnauts who used to oppress and persecute
them considered to be a kind of murderous
lizards called "moko-moko" - as this is explained
more comprehensively on the web page about the
church of St. Andrea Bobola
from Milicz.
#E3.
Every war is won by the level of morality of fighting parties, NOT by their weappon:
Motto:
"If you seek an idea which is worth your contribution, devote your energy to making alive, improving, and constructing - e.g. to the idea of
shifting time back and living forever,
but under no circumstances support ideas which require killing, enslaving, or destroying."
It is enough to see captions under this
photographs from "Fig. #E2", and the
previous "Fig. #1" to understand, that
the decisive about wining any war is NOT
at all the level of technical advancement,
economical power, or number of soldiers,
but the
level of morality
and consequences that result from this level -
e.g. the will and tradition of historical "learning",
improvement of own strategy, or "drawing
conclusions from what happens on fronts".
After all the fates of people are ruled by the
so-called principle of the "survival of
most moral" - which in the best way
is discussed in item #B1 from the web page
changelings.htm.
This principle was discovered only in 2012
by the new "totaliztic science". As this new
"totaliztic science" determined, in relation to
people equipped by God into the organ of
"conscience", this principle fulfils the same
function as in the world of wild animals deprived
of conscience fulfils the Darwin's principle
of the "survival of fittest". Unfortunately, the
lack of competence and the moral blindness
of the old so-called "atheistic orthodox science"
caused that this old human science overlooked
that the principle of the "survival of fittest" does
NOT apply to people. Therefore, officially this
science still erroneously and misleadingly insists
until today, that people also are ruled by this
animal principle of the "survival of fittest".
Therefore, I am encouraging here the reader
to learn descriptions and evidence on the topic
of both these principles (especially these ones
presented in items #G1 to #G7 from the web page
will.htm),
and then make up his or her own mind whether
the principle of the "survival of fittest" applies
also to people - as this is told us by the old
"atheistic orthodox science", or rather that
to people applies this new principle of the
"survival of most moral" - discovered only
in 2012 by the new "totaliztic science".
Unfortunately, if one looks carefully at fates
of last wars, e.g. Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait,
Afghanistan, or Iraq, then one easily discovers
that present military leaders and politicians
even from these most developed countries
are "hermetically closed for learning and for
drawing conclusions from lessons of the
history". So when they finally start a war
with some opponent who will be equal
to them in the military sense, and whose
position represents the moral justification
thus who has a will and a tradition to learn, to draw
conclusions, and to immediately implementat
the findings, fates of these militaries and
politicians, as well as fates of countries which
they supposed to defend, will be a repetition
of the fate of Hitler, his accomplices, Hitler's
army, German technique, and occupation,
subdivision, and penance of Germany that
followed the war. As a person that was born
in Poland and that loves his motherland
dearly, I am very disappointed that both
political and military leaders of Poland also
seem to belong to that group of "lesson-hermetic"
who stubbornly refuse to draw conclusions
from history lessons - see item #I2 below.
And Poland is just an independent nation
and country, which could afford to choose
its own path to the
better future.
In turn the long history of Polish martyrdom
causes, that it has NOT just the right,
but also a moral duty, to show to other
nations the correct path in the matter of
wars, by the adoption of neutrality and
by insisting on the active implementation
of the principle "never again".
The fact of loosing of every war by the side which
displays the lowest level of morality (i.e. typically
loosing it by the "aggressors" according to the
principle of the "survival of most moral")
is discussed also, amongst others, in item #C5.2
from the web page named
morals.htm.
In turn the abovementioned principle of the "survival
of most moral", which rules over outcomes of every
war, is presented most comprehensively in item
#B1 from the web page named
changelings.htm.
Part #F:
"When two elephants fight the grass suffer" (Korean proverb):
#F1.
Four abandoned graves of German soldiers by the dirt road from Milicz to Stawiec:
When the main group of juvenile scouts in
German military uniforms barricaded themselves
int he Milicz town-hall, four of them was posted
by the bridge on Barycz river with the order
to blast this bridge when Russians appear.
But Russians arrived from the south. So
juvenile scouts by the bridge saw with their
own eyes, as after a rapid explosion of shooting,
the streams of Russian led and fire instantly
reduced the town-hall into a pile of burning
rubbles. So they run for life. Probably they
originated from the village Stawiec (German "Steffitz"),
because they run for lives along initially the
present Krotoszyńska Street, and later uphill
of the old road that leads from the junction near
Wszewilki
to the village Stawiec. (This old road is actually
a section of the historical "Amber Root" which
in past led from the northern gate of Milicz,
the so-called "Gniezno Gate", through the village
Stawiec, towns Rawicz and Poznań, to Gniezno,
then to Gdańsk. Presently it runs in the middle
between two relatively new roads, the eastern
one of which leads to Cieszków passing by the
building of former waterworks of Milicz, while the
western one leads to Rawicz.) Unfortunately for
these juvenile German "soldiers", in the same
as they direction was send a Russian motorised
reconnoitring patrol. Of course, sharp eyes of
the Russian patrol fast noticed these four German
juveniles. The patrol seem to have an excellent sharp
shooter. The shooter took all four Germans in gaps
of just several meters from each other. Then some
local Samaritan, who remained in the area because
he considered himself to be a Pole, but probably
knew in person these juvenile "soldiers", buried
their corpses on the side of this dirt road, in places
where they fell down, traditionally honouring their
graves with their own military helmets hanged on
bayonets inserted into the soil. But with the elapse
of time disappeared even these bayonets and
helmets. One day perhaps their bones will be
discovered on the occasion of cleaning the
side of this dirt road.
#F2.
Snipers and casual witnesses:
Russian snipers were really excellent
sharp shooters. When the shooting started
for the town-hall of Milicz, a female inhabitant
of Wszewilki went in front of the southern wall
of her barn and with the curiosity watched the
vicious battle that was just raging in Milicz.
She was a Pole, an autochthon, not a German.
(This is why she would NOT run inside of
the Germany, when the Russian army
approached, as it was done by the majority
of other inhabitants of Wszewilki.) She considered
the attacking Russian army which just arrived
to Milicz to be "friends". However, in the course
of battle a Russian sniper went at the bank of
the Barycz river, to check whether under the
bridge do NOT hide any German soldiers.
This sniper from the height of the river bank
spotted the human figure standing in front of
her barn. So he decided to NOT risk that she
turns out an observer of the German army posted
to direct the canon fire. In spite that the distance
to this figure exceeded over 1 kilometre (as bullet
flies), still he managed to kill her with a single shot.
The poor lady fell down form the "friendly fire".
As this indicates, when nearby a battle is carried
out, then it is better for civilians to not get out from
their hiding places.
Part #G:
The war does NOT end when politicians sign
peace documents:
#G1.
The epidemics of "neck breaking" amongst autochthons from Milicz:
In old times the vicinity of Milicz belonged
to Poland. Thus a significant proportion of
local inhabitants considered themselves to
be Poles and refused to escape inside of
Germany from the attacking Russian army.
However, by some strange "convergence of
coincidents" (I personally believe that it was
an organised act, although well hidden, on
the part of some
dark force),
practically all amongst these autochthons
about the existence of which I knew, soon
after the war were killed on a multiple of ways.
Out of numerous ways on which the killing
of these autochthons from the vicinity of Milicz
took place, most puzzling for me seems to be a strange
"epidemics of breaking necks" by autochthons
that were somehow connected to my family.
About the mysterious "breaking the neck"
by one amongst these autochthons, whom I still
remember until today as a sparking with the sense
of humour, polite, nice, slim, and physically very
fit man, namely someone named Waloha
from the village of Wszewilki near Milicz, I am
writing in items #E1 and #E2 from the web page
wszewilki_uk.htm - about history and curiosities of the village Wszewilki.
But with the fate of my family was connected
also another autochthon named Count
Haupfman Nietzke von Kolande.
He was the estate owner that included the
village named Kolenda distant by around
10 kilometres to the east from Milicz. It was
him who employed my grandfather as an
equerry - as this is explained in item #B2
of the web page
about me (Dr Jan Pajak).
In spite of a German-sounding name, by his
genealogy he also considered himself to be
Polish. After all, one of his ancestors was a
mayor of the city of
Wrocław
in old times when Wrocław (as well as Milicz)
still used to belong to Poland.
He even used to speak Polish very well. So
he did NOT escape from the incoming Red
Army. He was a professional soldier - then
already retired at the rank of Captain. So he
was interested in the Russian army. Thus,
after Red Army entered Milicz, he drove a
motorbike to Milicz in order to see Russian
soldiers. But when returning home in some
mysterious way he "break his neck". He was
buried in the family tomb located in his village
Kolenda near Sulmierzyce. His wife also is
buried in there, only that on the communal
cemetery.
Part #H:
Remnants of the "battle for Milicz":
#H1.
Remnants of the murderous hardware after the battle for Milicz:
In times just after the war still another souvenir
existed after the German garrison from Milicz.
It was a wealth of German weapon and ammunition,
which was piled up in several warehouses of
Milicz. One such a warehouse, which existed
by the present Krotoszyńska Street, accumulated
huge numbers of German riffles. In order to
make impossible the use of these rifles by
unauthorised people, immediately after the
liberation Russians placed them in a line
over the edge of the footpath in present
Krotoszyńska Street, so that their barrels
lied on the footpath, while their triggers hanged
in the air above the road. Then along so
positioned riffles a heave Russian tank rolled,
with its caterpillar wheels pressing the rifles just
by the edge of footpath. The caterpillar wheels
of the tank acted like huge scissors, breaking
each rifle approximately in the area of the lock.
Thus soon after the war the present Krotoszyńska
Street was littered with thousands of German
military rifles broken in such a manner.
Of course, Russians did NOT manage to discover
and to neutralise all reserves of German weapon
and ammunition. Therefore Polish youngsters
who after the war arrived to Milicz, used these
remnants of the war as kinds of toys. For example,
they used to catch fish in the Barycz river by
throwing German grenades into water. A son
of my neighbour from Wszewilki just in such
a manner lost both his hands. Namely, when
he intended to stunt fish with such a German
grenade, he had a bad luck to use a grenade
which was sabotaged at the stage of production.
(In the last stadium of war, for the production of
German weapon and ammunition mainly foreign
slave workers were used, means prisoners and
prisoners of war. Therefore, they frequently
sabotaged their own production, although when
they were caught on this sabotage they were
immediately shot dead.) In the result, the grenade
exploded in hands of the son of my neighbour,
taking both his hands up to the shoulders. Other,
much bigger accident took place with a huge
pile of German airplane bombs, which lied on
the ground just behind Cieszków on the right
side of the road to Zduny. As it was told then,
people saw an older man as he knocked into
these bombs with his walking stick. Then a powerful
bang was heard. The older man could not be
found anymore. In the place where these bombs
used to lie until today a huge and deep hole in
the ground does exist, now filled up with water.
Ruins of the Milicz town-hall for a long time scared
people in the centre of the town-square with their
burned out windows. Even in the second half of
1950s, i.e. in times when I attended to the primary
school, still one could enter cellars of the town-hall
through a number of holes. In turn from these cellars
one could enter a labyrinth of underground tunnels
which exist under the town of Milicz. (These tunnels
are described on the web page
milicz_uk.htm - about the town of Milicz.)
Then these ruins were partially cleared. On their place
lawns with flowers were arranged, which beautified the
central-square of Milicz for several next years. In turn
the lawns were turned into a paved area that existed
in the central square of Milicz in 2004.
#H2.
The dump of rubbles left from the burned town-hall of Milicz:
The town-hall of Milicz was a relatively large
building. Thus, after it was burned down,
a large pile of rubbles was left in centre of
the town-square. These rubbles were removed
within the scope of first after-war community
services for the town of Milicz. To dump these
rubbles the old and dry riverbed of Barycz was selected,
which passed between the present bridge on
this river, and the first building of Milicz - the
one that previously used to be painted in yellow
and used to stand just by the old bed of river
Barycz, as it was an old tannery of Milicz.
(About this old bed of Barycz river and about
this tannery I am writing in item #8.3 from the
web page
wszewilki_milicz.htm - about sightseeing the village Wszewilki and the town Milicz,
so-far available only in the Polish language.
Presently this old bed of the river Barycz is
buried around 5 meters deep under the new
encircling road which near the bridge through
Barycz separates itself from the road to town-square
in Milicz.) The rubbles left from the Milicz town-hall
was carried to this dump site in "lorries" which
were pushed by hands along specially laid
rails which led from the town-hall to the old
riverbed of Barycz. As the eye-witnesses
claimed who saw with their own eyes these
"lorries", in the rubbles was more human bones
than ashes and bricks - this should NOT
surprise as learning the information from
item #C1 of this web page, that in the
town-hall from Milicz was burned alive
around 300 under-aged "defendants" of
Milicz. Independently from this rubbles,
to this after-war rubbish dump were later
dumped all other remains from the war,
as well as rubbish produced by people
and by factories from Milicz. I remember
that still in times when I was already going to
the primary school, stood in there remains of
some tankette - I believe that it was this burned
"tankette" described in item #C1 of this web
page. This "tankette" was abandoned approximately
at the extension of the former riverbed of
"Młynówka" which at that time was flowing
along the peripherals of the park. Probably
until today the location of this "tankette"
under the layer of rubbish and soil can
be detected with the "magnetic mines finder".
Later this area was used exclusively as the
rubbish dump for the entire town - until it
was filled up with rubbish completely to the
present level (which occurred around 1970s).
#H3.
Macabre souvenir from the war in the Church of
St. Andrea Bobola in Milicz:
In times just after the Second World War,
undergrounds of the Evangelic church from
Milicz (i.e. the church shown in "Fig. #H3")
were open and accessible for curious people.
Only that at that time the church was already
converted into the Roman Catholic church.
I knew in person some young people, who
ventured into these undergrounds. They told,
that the undergrounds were filled up with
coffins. One macabre details which hit their
eyes, was the dried body in a German military
uniform, pinned with the bayonet from a Russian
military rifle to one of these coffin. This German
was probably a member of that miniature German
garrison, which defended the town-hall of Milicz.
When his comrades surrounded to Russians,
he probably run from the town-hall through this
underground tunnel which at that time linked the
town-hall with cellars of the Evangelic church.
Then he hid from Russians in undergrounds
of that church. However, ha had a bad luck to
be discovered by Russians. So Russians pinned
him with the bayonet through his heart to the pile
of these wooden coffins. Then the bayonet was
broken, so that the corpse of that German was
hanging from a coffin. Soon afterwards it dried
out like a mummy. For several next years this
dried dead body in the German military uniform
was a macabre attraction for chance visitors in
these undergrounds.
Fig. #H3:
The church of
Saint Andrea Bobola
in Milicz. Before the World War Two it was the
evangelic church, while after the war it was
converted into the Roman Catholic church.
For me it has a sentimental value, as it was this
church that I (means Dr Eng. Jan Pajak) was
christened in it, took my lessons of religion,
was receiving my first holy communion, and
also received my confirmation of faith.
(This illustration is a repetition of
the illustration "Fig. #H3" from the web page
"Wszewilki-Milicz"
(in Polish) that described unofficial walking tracks
and manners of sightseeing of Milicz, and also
a repetition of the illustration "Fig. #29" from the
web page about the town of
Milicz.)
Presently this is the Catholic church under the invocation of
Saint Andrea Bobola.
This photograph was taken in 2003. The church
was constructed in years 1709 to 1712. The more
accurate description of it is provided on the separate
web page about the church of
Saint Andrea Bobola
and about the town of
Milicz.
Part #I:
Moral lessons that stem from the battle for Milicz:
#I1.
Recommendation of
totalizm:
"support only these ideas which require that you live for them, not die for them":
An extremely moral, peaceful, and progressive
philosophy has been developed in 1985,
called
totalizm.
The unique feature of it is, that that
it ascertains that "for totalizm it
is required to live, not to die".
The source of just such stand of totalizm
is a package of rigorous laws of the
universe called the
moral laws.
These moral laws rule with the iron
hand over repercussions of everything
that we only do in our lives. Among
others, they cause, that only these
human achievements are permanent,
which have been accomplished in a
moral manner. (Please notice that
the term "moral" has been used here
in the totaliztic, not in religious,
apprehension. Namely, the philosophy of
totalizm
ascertains, that "moral is everything
that is lifting every concerned person
uphill in this so-called moral field".)
In turn all human achievements which
have been accomplished in an immoral
manner, e.g. through war and through
hurting other people, elapse
relatively fast and in the final effect
they cause the reversal of themselves.
This is because moral laws substitute
them by their exact opposite. Therefore,
according to totalizm, it is never
possible to achieve anything permanent
with the assistance of war, unless this
war is purely defensive. (For purely
defensive wars moral laws make an
exception and they treat them as our
moral duty - for details look subsection
JC11.1 from volume 7 of
monograph [1/4].)
This timeless truth reveals also for us
the history of the battle for Milicz.
It is proper to remember about it,
when we become confronted in life
with situation that we must take a
stand regarding any war or aggression.
According to totalizm, moral laws,
and bitter historic experience, we
should always persist in such cases
to "never again". If we do
not believe, that it is necessary
to insist for all aggressive wars
to "never again", let us consider
for a moment what about the today's
repercussions of their war would
say all these young people who died
during the battle for Milicz described
on this web page (independently whether
these would be fallen German or Russian
soldiers). Let us consider whether
they would confirm that YES, for whatever
they can see today around it was proper
to die, or rather NO - means they
would also said to us "never again"?
Motto:
"Every aggressive war is an
immoral
war - therefore
moral laws
always make sure that eventually it is lost
by the aggressors and won by the defenders."
On a whole range of internet web pages of
totalizm
a newly discovered kind of laws of the universe
is described. These laws strongly influence
our lives. They are called the
moral laws.
Moral laws are very unusual. On one
hand they work repetitively, ruthlessly,
and non-negotiable - similarly like physical
laws. For example the moral law called the
"Boomerang Principle" always returns to a
giver exactly the same amount and kind of
feelings that this giver earlier served to someone's
else. The return of these feelings is carried
out by the Boomerang Principle in the equally
non-negotiable manner, as the physical law
of "action and reaction" always returns to a
hitting person the force of his hit. On the other
hand, behind the execution of moral laws
stands a superior intelligence and knowledge of
God
himself - as this is explained in subsection
I3.6 from volume 5 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
Moral laws do NOT act blindly and non-preferentially -
like physical laws do, but their action is
characterised by extreme intelligence
and dependency on the current course
of the so-called
moral field.
For example, if someone kills, then in
normal situation according to the action
of moral laws he himself also must live
through being killed, so that he experiences
himself the same feelings as his victims do.
But if someone kills in the self-defence,
then the only thing that awaits him in the
future, is a bit of emotion - as this is
explained in more details in subsection
JC11.1 from volume 7 of
monograph [1/4].
This is because the moral laws impose
on everyone the duty of self-defence
against aggression. Thus they do
NOT punish these people who are forced
to kill in self-defence. But returning to the
presentation of moral laws on the web
pages of totalizm, these laws are described
not only on the web page about the philosophy of
totalizm
and about the reversal of totalizm - means
the philosophy of
parasitism,
but also on web pages about
nirvana,
morality,
karma,
time vehicles and
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Because in every war all laws and phenomena
reveal their action in an extreme manner, also
the action of moral laws most clearly hits eyes
just in events taking place during wars. Let us
summarise now briefly these outcomes of
moral laws action, which become clearly
visible just on the base of descriptions from
this web page concerning the battle for Milicz.
Here are the most important of them:
(1) In the final count every war is always
lost by an aggressor. From the moral
point of view in every war there is a struggle
between an "aggressor" and a "defending
itself". The aggressor according to moral laws
is always the one who sends its army to attack
a territory which does NOT belong to it. The
defending itself for moral laws is always the one
who defends its own territory against an attack
of an aggressor. Moral laws in every such a war
have a very simple action - namely they always
in the final count cause that the war is lost by
an aggressor and won by the defending itself.
An example of just such an action of moral
laws is not only the Second World War described
on this web page, but practically every war.
In my opinion a perfect example of just such
action of moral laws is the Finish-Soviet war
of 1944-5, by Finish called the "Continuation War".
This war was won by Finish, in spite that they
fought against a powerful Soviet army, which
just annihilated Germans. Of course, the main
reason for which Finish won this war was the
action of moral laws. After all, in this war a
small army of Finland represented the defending
itself, while a huge army of Russia was the aggressor.
In turn Germans could be broken by Russians
only because the moral laws them (Russians)
treated as defending themselves, while the
Hitler's army these laws treated as aggressors.
(2) In the initial phase of every war the
development of situation is such that it clearly
and unambiguously reveals who is an aggressor
and who defends itself.
Means, in the initial phase of every war the
aggressor has successes until the moment
of time when with its actions it documents
illustratively to everyone that it is the aggressor.
Only then the moral laws get into action and
the aggressor begins to loose a given war
gradually.
(3) The appearance of the "black hole" in
every war - as a last warning to the aggressor.
After the initial "overwhelming successes" of the
aggressor - which are planned in advance by
moral laws to document illustratively who is
the aggressor and who is the defending itself,
in every war comes a period of so-called "black
hole". In this period the aggressor is forced to
put into the war ever increasing number of
people, resources, equipment, money, etc.,
which after being thrown into the "war theatre"
simply disappear forever. A perfect example
of just such a "black hole" was for Germans
the eastern front in the Second World War.
The "black hole" is a kind of final (moral)
warning which the moral laws give to the
aggressor for consideration - in order to
persuade it to finish the war. If this black
hole is unable to discourage the aggressor
for the continuation of the war, while the war
is still carried out, then the third stage of the
war takes place (i.e. the "finishing of the aggressor").
In that phase the aggressor experiences (usually
on its own territory) all these "pleasures" which
previously it served to the one that it attacked.
(4) The action of the moral law named the
"Boomerang Principle" - the amount of created
suffering is equal to the amount of received
suffering. The action of the Boomerang
Principle reveals itself in every war in this manner,
that the side which inflicts to the other a kind
of suffering, some time later is exposed itself
to the suffering of the exactly the same character.
If for some reason the suffering received have
a lower intensity than the suffering inflicted,
then the time of their action is appropriately
extended, so that the total amount of suffering
is equal on both sides. Thus the Boomerang
Principle causes that for suffering is in power
a special kind of energy balance - the amount
of inflicted suffering is always equal to the amount
of received suffering. The action of this law is
perfectly visible on fate of Germany after the
Second World War. Although the suffering of
German after the war had a lower intensity
than the suffering which Germans inflicted to
others during their aggression, their suffering
spread into a longer period of time. Also the
demolition of the Berlin Wall in 1989 did NOT
finish it, but they last still until now because of
the disproportions and inequality which emerged
in both parts of Germany in the result of the
Second World War.
(5) Moral laws prepare the outcome of
every war a long time in advance before this
war began. The outcome of every
war is prepared by moral laws a long time
before a given war starts. This preparation
"a priori" is possible because of the existence
of so-called "space-time" described more
comprehensively on separate web pages,
e.g. on web pages about
time vehicles or about
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
In general, this preparation of the outcome
depends on the creation for the defending
itself such a situation, that it has some kind
of initially unaware superiority over the
aggressor (e.g. in case of the Second World
War this superiority was given to Russians,
amongst others, tanks T-34 which were much
better than tanks of Germans, also a better
strategy of the use of these tanks, as well as
"pepesha"). Simultaneously for the aggressor
the moral laws prepare an illusive impression
of having an advantage - e.g. it can believe
in its "fire power", or in "advanced technology".
But in the action it always turns out that in
conditions in which the aggressor unwisely
puts itself, these points of supposed advantage
turn out completely useless.
(6) NO war solves problems the appearance
of which was utilised as an excuse to initiate it,
but only intensifies these problems - so let us
learn to negotiate instead of bombarding.
Every war after is finished turns out to be
completely useless. It only destroys the
fighting sides, but never solves their problems.
Therefore, at the final end, these problems still
needs to be solved in a peaceful manner
through negotiations. A perfect example
how opposite are outcomes of the war to
these expected by the aggressor, can also
be the Second World War. Hitler initiated this
war as an excuse to extend the territory of
'Germany. But in time when Hitler was initiating
it, Germany occupied practically the biggest
area in the entire its history. Not only then
belonged to Germany almost a half of present
Poland, but also present Austria, Czech and
Slovakia. Furthermore, if Germany would
then concentrate on multiplying its prosperity
instead of war, almost for sure in the later date
to Germany would peacefully join also
Switzerland, Italy, and Spain - all these
countries before the war show such inclinations.
(Nothing is so persuasive to people as the
prospect of living in prosperity.) In the result,
if Hitler do NOT start the Second World War,
by today Germany would become a superpower
which would envelop almost the entire area
of present Common Market (EWG), while the
level of prosperity in that country would be
just unimaginable. But we all know how the
situation changed in the result of that war.
(7) Every aggressive war deprives the
esteem, respect, authority, and good name.
These attributes in turn take centuries to be
restored (sometimes even thousands of years),
and people still may keep reminding someone
their lack. After all, it is commonly known that
whatever someone did once, in the encouraging
conditions he or she can do it again. Therefore,
in spite that after the war politicians flood with
polite comments the former aggressor and
friendly show teeth in diplomatic smiles,
many amongst them shares feelings of the
attacked nation and on the bottom of souls
harbours feelings keep eye on these our
former aggressors and do not allow them to
do too well, as in encouraging circumstances
and when they have an aggressive leader,
they have a potential to do again what they
did once before, or the principle "since
once they attacked others, they are able to
attack also us - thus better to keep far from
them and have nothing to do with them."
(8) Fate of individual people that fight on the
side of the aggressor, with the elapse of time
become similar to the fate that this aggressor
prepared to people that fight on the side that
defends itself. Means, to the fate of people
who fight on the side of the aggressor applies
the moral law called the
Boomerang Principle.
(9) Every aggressive war deprives the "free
will" all people sucked into it. Especially
strongly it deprives the aggressor from the free
will. How and why this deprivation of free will
takes place, and what it means exactly,
is explained more comprehensively in next
item #I3 of this web page.
* * *
The most clearly the action of moral laws
described here is illustrated in captions
under illustrations "Fig. #E1.1" to "Fig. #E2"
from this web page.
#I3.
Every war deprives people of their "free will" which originally was given to them by
God:
The biggest blessing that
God
gave to humans, and which distinguishes
people from animals, is the aware "free
will". Also the biggest punishment that
can be imposed on someone, is just the
deprival of this "free will". It is why, if
someone is a criminal, the society
deprives him just the "free will" through
locking him in a prison. It is also why
everyone who somehow is imprisoned,
while his free will is taken away from him,
fight till the end to regain it.
In the history of humanity every now and again
trends appear, with the assistance of which one
group of people tries to deprive the free will of
other group of people. A best example of these
trends was the political system of "slavery" - in
which owners of slaves deprived their slaves of
free will. After the fall of slavery system, certain
social groups invented another manner for taking
away free will from people. It was the "drudgery" -
means binding serfs to the land and to the owners
of that land. When also this manner of depriving
the free will was gradually abolished, again certain
groups in the human society invented another
manner of depriving people of their free will.
It was obligatory conscription to the army,
that used an excuse of a "patriotic duty" -
although in fact it was just placing in the
situation that a given person can be forced
to kill without the regard to his belief in God,
his personal philosophy, or views. (This
obligatory conscription to the army I discuss
in item #F3 of the separate web page named
memorial.
It is just because of this obligatory conscription
breaks not only someone's free will and
someone's human rights, and also breaks
commandments given to us by God,
it is worth to undertake a serious discussion
as to whether it is legal in the light of the
existing laws. This is because for sure
it is NOT moral.)
Next to a war, this obligatory conscription
to an army, are at present two main
remnants of the slavery system, which still
are operational in the human societies.
After all, similarly as in the slavery system,
they both deprive humans their "free will"
given to them by
God.
The loss of free will is NOT only the biggest
punishment that can be imposed onto a human
being, but it also introduces an array of various
implications that do not limit themselves to morality
nor to religion. For example, it can be a reason for
loosing the health. The mechanism of this loss is
such, that only these people who have a free will
can generate for themselves the so-called
moral energy -
sometimes called also the "zwow" energy (from
the Polish words "zasób wolnej woli"). This
energy "zwow" is absolutely vital for life and
for health. For example, people who have a
deficit of "zwow" are immediately falling into a
depression, and nothing is able to heal them
from this depression until they rebuild in
themselves the level of "zwow" - as this is
explained in item #C5 of the web page about
the philosophy of
parasitism.
This is why cosmic civilisations, the citizens
of which are deprived of free will because of the
slavery system that they practice, are unable to
generate this moral energy. Therefore such
cosmic civilisations are forced to
rob
moral energy that they need from other civilisations -
in this number from the human civilisation on the Earth
(for details see item #E1 from the web page
memorial).
The life energy generated from "zwow" by people
that have the free will, can be sucked (robbed) from
humans and then transmitted to other people.
Devices used for such a "sucking" of the life energy,
and for saturating with it other beings, are widely
utilised by UFOnauts on people abducted to decks
of UFOs. Both kinds of these devices (means sucking
devices and saturating devices) are described in the
Polish treatise [3b].
The devices used for sucking this energy in the treatise
[3b] are called "cold chambers" - e.g. see verses no
{5550} and {5120} in [3b]. What even more interesting,
UFOnauts that rob this energy from people can live
without sleep - this suggests that the conversion of
zwow energy into the life energy is carried out mainly
during the sleep. Interesting is also that UFOnauts who
do NOT eat meet, intensely promote "vegetarianism"
amongst humans - most clearly the life energy carries
in itself the taste preferences from the robbed into the
robbing one. More about both these energies is explained
in subsection I5.6 from volume 5 of
monograph [1/5].
An example of one amongst numerous manners
on which wars deprive people their free will is
illustrated in "Fig. #I3" below.
Fig. #I3:
An example of situation created by every war,
when all people sucked into it are deprived
of "free will" by this war. (Click on this photograph
to see it enlarged.) This situation shows a
typical scene of execution of Korean patriots
by a firing squad of Japanese occupants.
Myself (i.e. Dr Jan Pajak) photographed this
scene after it was faithfully reconstructed
in the "Independence Hall of Korea" located
in the town Cheonan from the South Korea.
(In fact the content of this scene has a
link with descriptions of my life in Korea,
presented on a separate web page named
Korea.)
The scene clearly illustrates how a war is taking
away the "free will" from people sucked into it.
For example, each Japanese soldier that carried
out this execution was forced to kill whomever was
placed in front of his barrel, without the regard
to his faith in
God
or to his personal philosophy. (Some amongst
executed people were women.) This is because
if he would refuse to shoot, then he would be shot
himself under the excuse of the disobeying orders.
In turn almost every person who was executed
admitted his or her guilt towards "crimes" he or
she was accused, only because Japanese received
"quotas" from their government how many Koreans
they must force to "confess" to the guilt and then execute.
Thus, in order to meet these "quotas", Japanese
used very "persuading" methods of forcing "confessions",
such as pulling finger nails with pliers, scorching
with red-hot steel rods, overfilling with water and
then jumping at stomach of a victim, tearing apart
genitals, etc., etc. With such "methods of investigation"
almost everyone confessed to everything that was
accused.
At this point it should be noticed, that the above
situation symbolises the majority of situations
which appear during every war, and which
the final effect is the depriving people of their
free will. For example, these juvenile "defenders
of Milicz" described in item #B1 and in the
caption under "Fig. #D2" from this web page,
also was placed in just such a situation.
After all, Hitler issued an order that every
male capable of holding a weapon must
be conscripted to the army, and if he refuses -
he must be immediately shot by a firing squad.
So if these juvenile defenders of Milicz
refused to join the Hitler's army, they would
be shot by their own people. But since they
not refused to participate in this supposed
"patriotic duty" - they were executed by Russians.
#I4.
Czy w drugiej wojnie światowej "warto było umierać"?:
Najbardziej w tym wszystkim makabryczne
było, że owi młodzi ludzie z
obu walczących stron, którzy nawzajem wymordowali się w
Miliczu, faktycznie byli jak każdy z nas, znaczy kochali kogoś,
sami byli przez kogoś kochani, mieli swoje marzenia i nadzieje,
patrzyli optymistycznie w przyszłość, itp. Gdyby spotkali się
w innych czasach lub innych warunkach, niemal z całą
pewnością zostaliby przyjaciółmi. Jednak polityczne ambicje
ich przywódców, a także
szatańskie moce
jakie obecnie kontrolują naszą planetę, spowodowały że zamiast
żyć i dać innym pożyć, zmuszeni zostali aby zabijać i być zabijani.
Zastanówmy się przez chwilę kto naprawdę popycha ludzi
do mordowania swoich bliźnich. Czy są to inni ludzie, czy też
przywódcy-podmieńcy
działający na Ziemi z ramienia owych szatańskich istot w
których mocy Ziemia ciągle do dzisiaj się znajduje, a które
od wieków nazywane były diabłami, serpentami, szatanem,
złymi czarownikami, itp., zaś ostatnio nazywani są
UFOnautami.
Wszakże jeśli się dokładniej przyglądnąć zdjęciom
przywódców z okresu drugiej wojny światowej,
u niemal wszystkich tych przywódców włosy nad czołem
porastały pod górę głowy -
który to szczegół anatomiczny wcale NIE jest
typowy dla ludzi zamieszkujących Ziemię.
Jeśli zaś nadal masz wątpliwości kto naprawdę
kryje się za całym złem piętrzącym się na Ziemi,
poczytaj sobie o UFOnautach z totaliztycznych stron
katowice.htm,
evil_pl.htm.
predators_pl.htm, czy
ufo_pl.htm.
Jeśli dzisiaj rozglądnąć się dookoła, nasz świat
wcale NIE wygląda lepiej niż wyglądał przed drugą
wojną światową. Wprawdzie poprzenosiliśmy nasze
tyłki z konnych dorożek na wyłożone plastykiem
siedzenia samochodów, jednak jak wówczas ciągle
ludzkość jest trapiona przez takie same bezrobocie,
kryzysy ekonomiczne, zachłanność bogatych i cierpienia
biednych, niesprawiedliwość, głód milionów mieszkańców
Ziemi, itp. Gdyby więc obraz dzisiejszego świata
pokazać tamtym młodym ludziom którzy zginęli podczas
"bitwy o Milicz", jest więcej niż pewnym że wszyscy
oni mieliby dla nas tą samą wiadomość. Mianowicie,
wszyscy oni powtarzaliby nam jednogłośnie "NIE
warto umierać z powodu ambicji polityków", "ludzie
zaprzestańcie wojen", "odsuwajcie od władzy
wojowniczych polityków", całą dostępną wam mocą
promujcie neutralność i wdrażajcie zasadę "nigdy
więcej wojny", itd., itp.
Part #J:
Characteristics of every war are also proofs that
God does exist:
#J1.
In the universe without
God
war would look-like completely different:
Motto:
"In the universe governed by God everything is judged by criterions of morality."
People who claim that God does NOT excist
must have a cement instead of brains. After
all, if they use their logic and ask the question
"whether the world deprived of God really would
look the same as our present world", then only
someone completely thoughless would NOT
notice significant differences. For example,
in the world without God would NOT exist such
phenomena as morality, conscience, link
between fates and practiced morality, similarity
commandments in all religions, miracles,
supernatural phenomena, etc., etc. - for
detailed descriptions of differences between
a hypothetical (because non-existing)
"world without God" and our world ruled by
omnipotent God see item #B1 on the web page named
changelings.htm.
Jednym z przedsięwzięć ludzkich które ujawniają
najwyraźniej owo zarządzanie światem fizycznym
przez Boga, są właśnie wojny. Jak bowiem każdy
może łatwo to sobie sam sprawdzić, we wszystkich
ludzkich wojnach wyraźnie dają się odnotować
następujące regularności jakie musiałyby być
zupełnie nieobecne we wszechświecie bez Boga:
1. Każda wojna posiada wyraźnie zdefiniowany cel
moralny jakim jest podnoszenie stanu moralnego co
najmniej jednej z biorących w niej udział stron.
Aczkolwiek historycy ograniczani przez najróżniejsze
naciski, stereotypy i tradycje, typowo unikają podania
owego celu, cel ten relatywnie łatwo daje się poznać
poprzez porównanie sytuacji moralnej walczących
stron przed i po danej wojnie. Oczywiście, sytuację
tą najwyraźniej widać w porównaniach moralności
panującej przed i po drugiej wojnie światowej. Odnowa
moralna wprowadzana przez wojny, zakwalifikuje owe
konflikty zbrojne do tego samego zbioru narzędzi Boga
co trzęsienia ziemi, tsunami i inne mordercze kataklizmy
opisywane np. na totaliztycznych stronach o nazwach
seismograph_pl.htm
oraz
day26_pl.htm.
2. Każdą wojnę zawsze wygrywa strona która
opowiada się po stronie moralności i ludzkich
wartości wynikających z moralności (np. prawdy,
wolności, sprawiedliwości, itp.). Ta zasada
wygrywania wojny przez stronę o wyższym potencjale
moralnym jest potwierdzana przez wszystkie wojny
znane nam z historii, począwszy od wojny trojańskiej,
termopilów oraz krzyżackiej bitwy pod Grumwaldem,
poprzez obie wojny światowe, a skończywszy na
niedawnych wojnach w Korei, Wietnamie, Afganistanie
czy Iraku.
3. Każdy najeźdźca i okupant z czasem zostaje
wyrzucony z najechanego i okupowanego przez
siebie kraju. Wszakże każdy najeźdźca zaczyna
daną wojnę od wysoce niemoralnego aktu - jakim
jest najechanie odmiennego kraju. Ponieważ zaś
wygrana każdej wojny należy do strony która
opowiada się za moralnością, każdy najeźdźca
przegrywa zaczętą przez siebie wojnę.
Już sam fakt że w wojnach pojawiają się takie
regularności które bazują na definicji moralności
jaka NIE mogłaby być sformułowana i sprawdzana
w świecie pozbawionym Boga, są już same w sobie
dowodem że wojny są jednym z narzędzi używanych
przez Boga. Jako zaś takie, wojny o przebiegach
i wynikach jakie znamy z historii ludzkości są także
dowodem że Bóg istnieje i że zdecydowanie interweniuje
On w sprawy ludzkości.
Niestey, natura ludzka jest taka, że u ludzi którzy
"wierzą w Boga" zanika pęd do wiedzy - tak jak
to wyjaśniono w punkcie #J3 poniżej. Aby więc
pęd ten ciągle utrzymać, Bogu potrzebni są również
ateiści. Dlatego aby NIE odbierać ludziom tzw.
"wolnej woli" w wyborze przez nich wyjaśnienia
kto steruje i zarządza przebiegiem oraz wynikami
wojen, Bóg zawsze starannie ukrywa swoje istnienie
i swoją bezpośrednią ingerencję w ludzkie sprawy -
tak jak wyjaśnia to punkt #D1 strony
ufo_pl.htm.
Dlatego przykładowo dla przebiegu
i wyników wojen, Bóg opracował rodzaj jakby
"standardowego scenariusza" którego celem
jest ukrycie Jego roli oraz faktu że wynik danej
wojny jest z góry przesądzony stanem moralnym
walczących stron. W owym "standardowym scenariuszu"
niemoralna strona która ma przegrać daną wojnę,
zawsze na początku odnosi spektakularne zwycięstwa
i niemal ją wygrywa. Potem następuje długi okres
zmagań w którym wygląda jakby obie strony miały
równowagę sił. W końcu strona moralna z wielkim
wysiłkiem wykorzystuje jakieś błędy które popełniła
strona niemoralna i zwolna wygrywa daną wojnę.
W sumie ów scenariusz sprawia wrażenie że o tym
kto wygrywa daną wojnę decydują przypadki i siła
fizyczna walczących stron.
#J2.
Goals which
God
used to accomplish through wars:
Jak się okazuje, Bóg wykorzystuje wojny do
wydobywania uwikłanych w nie społeczeństw
ze szponów wysoce niemoralnej filozofii zwanej
filozofią pasożytnictwa
oraz do pobudzania u nich "odnowy moralnej".
Stąd wojny faktycznie są jednym z narzędzi
używanych przez Boga do "korygowania
moralności" wybranych społeczeństw. Wojny
są więc bardzo podobne w swojej funkcji
do często obecnie używanych przez Boga
"kataklizmów" - opisywanych m.in. w
punktach #B1 i #B4 strony o nazwie
seismograph_pl.htm
oraz w punkcie #E2 strony o nazwie
day26_pl.htm.
Niestety, z chwilą opracowania przez ludzkość
bomby atomowej, możliwości wojny uległy drastycznej
zmianie. Wszakże przed czasami bomby atomowej
wojna była w stanie moralnie skorygować dowolne
społeczeństwo, jednak NIE była w stanie zniszczyć
całej ludzkości. Natomiast po opracowaniu bomby
jądrowej, "światowa wojna nuklearna" jest w stanie
zniszczyć całą ludzkość. Stąd Bóg w ostatnich
czasach jest już ostrożniejszy w użyciu wojen
jako narzędzi do korygowania moralności wybranych
społeczeństw. Wszakże obecnie niemal każda
wojna ma potencjał aby przekształcić się w "światową
wojnę nuklearną" - a tym samym też i potencjał
aby zniszczyć całą ludzkość. Do zniszczenia
zaś całej ludzkości Bóg NIE może dopuścić -
wszakże ludzie są Bogu potrzebni. (Po wyjaśnienie
dlaczego Bóg potrzebuje ludzkość patrz punkt
#B3 na totaliztycznej stronie o nazwie
wil_pl.htm.)
#J3.
One always can stop believing, but one almost never stops knowing:
Motto:
"Knowledge induces hunger for more knowledge."
Używając kryterium czyjegoś stosunku do
Boga, aż do roku 1985 każdą osobę na Ziemi
dawało się zakwalifikować do jednej z dwóch
kategorii, mianowicie albo do kategorii (1)
"ateistów", albo też do kategorii ludzi (2)
"wierzących w Boga". Jednak opracowanie
w 1985 roku nowej naukowej
teorii wszystkiego
zwanej
Konceptem Dipolarnej Grawitacji,
dodało jeszcze jedną kategorię ludzi do owych
dwóch już istniejących uprzednio. Mianowicie
dodało ono kategorię ludzi (3) "wiedzących
o Bogu". Reprezentancji tej kategorii (3) są na
jeszcze wyższym poziomie bliskości do Boga
niż osoby "wierzące w Boga". Wszakże oni
wiedzą z całą pewnością że
Bóg istnieje,
wiedzą kim jest ów Bóg, jak działa, gdzie rezyduje,
dlaczego stworzył ludzi i czego wymaga od ludzi,
a ponadto doskonale znają swoje osobiste dowody
jakie im potwierdzają owo istnienie i działanie Boga.
Jak zaś wiadomo, zawsze można przestać w coś
wierzyć, jednak nigdy NIE przestaje się czegoś
wiedzieć. Na dodatek, jedną z cech wiedzy jest,
że zawsze pobudza ona głód jeszcze większej
wiedzy. Stąd osoby które poznały i zaakceptowały ów
Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji,
a stąd włączyły siebie do grona (3) "wiedzących
o Bogu" wykazują zupełnie odmienny pęd do
wiedzy, niż osoby z kategorii (1) "ateistów" i
osoby z kategorii (2) "wierzących w Boga".
Ów ich pęd do wiedzy wypełnia zasadę "kocham
swego Boga i stwórcę, a stąd chcę go dokładniej
poznać aby móc mu lepiej służyć". Ponadto,
w imię poznania swego Boga pęd ten pozwala
aby zadawać wszelkie pytania na temat Boga -
a stąd pozwala m.in. aby naukowo wyjaśnić
"dlaczego Bóg toleruje wojny, kataklizmy i
nieszczęścia". Wysoce pouczającym jest
więc poznanie różnic w cechach osób z obu
tych trzech kategorii. Aby poznać te różnice
poniżej krótko streścimy każdą z nich:
1.
Ateiści. W typowych przypadkach ateistami zostają
albo osoby które mają jakąś ułomność za jaką nabyły się
one trwałego żalu do Boga, albo też osoby które pozbawione
są zdolności do krytycznego myślenia i jednocześnie przez
zbyt długi okres czasu pozostawały pod wpływem obecnego
ateistycznego systemu edukacyjnego. Takie pochodzenie
ateistów powoduje, że typowo prowadzą oni "wyprawy
krzyżowe" przeciwko Bogu, budując w tym celu cały
"ateistyczny gmach nauki" jakiej zasadniczym celem
jest udowodnienie że Boga NIE ma. Przykładem takiej
ateistycznej "wyprawy krzyżowej" przeciwko Bogu są
działania opisane w artykule "Hawking: discoveries leave
no place for God" (tj. "Hawking: odkrycia nie pozostawiają
miejsca na Boga"), ze strony B1 nowozelandzkiej gazety
The Dominion Post,
wydanie z piątku (Friday), September 3, 2010. Budowanie
tego "gmachu ateistycznej wiedzy" dostarczyło ludzkości
"pędu do wiedzy" który na uprzednim etapie jej rozwoju
był głównym i praktycznie jedynym motorem postępu.
Problem jednak z owym "gmachem ateistycznej nauki"
jest, że opiera się on wyłącznie na "fizykalnym materiale
dowodowym", który wszakże został stworzony przez Boga,
a stąd który może być przez tegoż Boga manipulowany
i fabrykowany w dowolny sposób. W ten sposób
ateistyczny pęd do wiedzy prowadzi do poznania
jedynie "rzeczywistości pozornej", tj. tylko małego
fragmentu "rzeczywistości prawdziwej" celowo stworzonego
przez Boga w dany sposób dla osiagnięcia jakichś tam
nadrzędnych boskich celów. Nie pozwala on jednak na poznanie
"rzeczywistości prawdziwej" która dodatkowo obejmuje
Boga, jego cele i metody działania, oraz boskie motywacje
tworzenia takich a nie innych "rzeczywistości pozornych".
Stąd "rzeczywistość prawdziwą" są w stanie poznać jedynie
osoby z kategorii (3) "ludzi wiedzących o Bogu". Dokładniejsze
pojęcie jak odmienna może być "rzeczywistość pozorna"
od "rzeczywistości prawdziwej" daje poznanie strony o nazwie
evolution_pl.htm.
2.
Wierzący w Boga. Jak to ujawniają dedukcje
przytoczone w punkcie #F2 strony o nazwie
evil_pl.htm,
w punkcie #A2 strony o nazwie
will_pl.htm,
czy w punkcie #C4.4 strony o nazwie
morals_pl.htm,
gdyby świat zamieszkały
był wyłącznie przez osoby z kategorii (2) ślepo
"wierzących w Boga", wówczas do dzisiaj ludzie
zapewne ciągle mieszkaliby w jaskiniach, nie
znaliby ognia, oraz składali Bogu ofiary z ludzi.
Wszakże wierzący wierzą że "wszystko pochodzi
od Boga", nie mają więc motywacji poznawczej
ani pędu do wiedzy, zaś każde nieszczęście traktują
jako dar od Boga którego NIE wolno kwestionować
ani z nim walczyć. Jedyne co potrafią to bałwochwalczo
i bezmyślnie czcić Boga, bez końca schlebiać Bogu
przez odklepywanie paciorków wychwalających jego
wielkość, oraz uznawać za bluźnierstwo wszelkie
pytania na temat Boga. Ich pęd do wiedzy i zdolności
poznawcze są więc zamrożone na każdym możliwym
polu. Ich życie sprowadza się do konsumowania tego
co Bóg im daje, bez wprowadzania jakiegokolwiek postępu.
3.
Wiedzący o Bogu. Ci drastycznie różnią się od
wierzących. Wiedzą wszakże że Bóg z całą pewnością
istnieje - tak samo pewnie jak matematycy wiedzą że
liczby istnieją, zaś fizycy wiedzą że istnieje grawitacja,
energia i materia. Każdy z nich zna też co najmniej
jeden swój osobisty dowód na istnienie Boga. Z kolei
ta ich wiedza budzi w nich głód jeszcze większej
wiedzy o Bogu. Nie boją się więc znajdować odpowiedzi
na wszelkie pytania które wynikają z miłości do swego Boga
i stwórcy. Ponieważ zaś rozumieją swego Boga, zaczynają
także analizować moralną potrzebę i celowość niektórych
co bardziej przykrych aktów Boga, takich jak nieszczęścia,
kataklizmy, wojny, itp. Z kolei zrozumienie zasad działania
moralności, streszczonych w punkcie #F1 strony
rok.htm,
zmusza ich do nieustannej walki z przeciwnościami losu
i z następstwami ludzkiej niemoralności. Poprzez nieustanne
zadawanie sobie pytania "dlaczego Bóg to spowodował",
"jak Bóg tego dokonał", "czym Bóg się kierował", itp.,
zwolna są oni w stanie poznać "przeczywistość prawdziwą"
w jakiej ludzkość żyje i się rozwija. To dzięki ich pędzie
do wiedzy, możliwe stało się znalezienie odpowiedzi np.
dlaczego Bóg pozwala na wojny, a także zrozumienie,
że Bóg NIE może dopuścić do wybuchu "światowej
wojny nuklearnej".
#J4.
Let us NOT panic - in the universe ruled by
God
the "world's nuclear war" will NOT happen:
As well all know, every now and then various
"false prophets" inflate their own "ego" by
scaring other people with something. And
so, we can hear from them, e.g. that the
"end of world" is just approaching" - for details
see item #N1 from the web page named
quake.htm
or see item #B8 from the web page named
seismograph.htm.
Or we hear that powerful people of this world
just are planning the initiation of the "world
nuclear war". Thus, I would like to take the
opportunity of the war topic of this web page,
to guarantee the reader that such a "world
nuclear war" never will happen. Namely,
on the basis on my findings regarding goals,
methods and motivations of God’s actions,
herewith I am guaranteeing that in the
universe created and intelligently ruled by
God, this God never allows the starting of
the "world's-wide nuclear war" - means
a war in which atomic bombs would be attacking
the territory of practically almost every country
on the Earth, while all Godly creatures would
be completely destroyed by these bombs.
(About the fact, that the universe is really ruled
by intelligent God, certifies NOT only evidence
accumulated in the content of this web page,
but also the large body of scientific evidence
presented e.g. in the content of web page named
god_proof.htm,
web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm,
or in a number of other totaliztic publications.)
Although for various important reasons God may
sometimes allow that here or there someone throws
or explodes a nuclear bomb and destroys with it
a city or even a significant region, or that somewhere
happens a destructive nuclear catastrophe - similar
to that one from Friday on 11 March 2011 in Fukushima,
Japan (described more comprehensively in items
#C7 and #I1 of the web page named
seismograph.htm
and in items #M1 to #M1.3 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm).
However, for the "world's nuclear war" capable
of annihilating the entire humanity God cannot
allow. Therefore such a war will never happen
on the Earth. I am giving for this my personal
guarantees based on my many-years long
research of principles of God's actions and
motivations which God applies in His activities.
If any politician with over-inflated ego insists to
start a "world's nuclear war" in this newest situation
when the raging of such a war threatens the
annihilation of the entire humanity, then God
has NO other option but to intervene personally
and somehow deprive this politician his power.
After all, the continuation of existence of the
humanity is absolutely necessary for God to
accomplish his superior goals. Therefore, in
the newest history is already known several
situations, when such a "world's nuclear war"
was avoided on the Earth just because of a
series of strange events that bordered with
miracles. Out of the entire array such events,
for me personally the most meaningful is the
one described in the next item #J5. This event
NOT only that reveals methods which God uses
when is forced to correct in person the initiated
by people deviations from the direction imposed
at us by God, but also confirms a number of
findings of the new so-called "totaliztic science"
described, amongst others, on the web page
immortality.htm - about accomplishing immortality through repetitive shifting back in time after each living to an old age.
(E.g. it confirms the finding of the new "totaliztic
science", that God repetitively shifts time back
and erases completely from human memories
and from the history of the humanity every event
which does NOT agree with goals, plans, and
intentions of God. Or confirms also the finding,
that the life of every person is predefined in
advance by the so-called "program of life and
fate" which God uploaded to the
soul
of this person.)
The sole fact, that the history already noted on
the Earth numerous occurrences of just such
"corrective" actions of God, should be for every
one amongst us the sufficient demonstration of the
will, power, and implementation capabilities of
God in correcting such historical events initiated
by people, which disagree with goals, intentions,
and plans of God. The destruction of the entire
humanity by some idiotic "world's nuclear war"
only to satisfy the over-inflated ambitions of
individual politicians, is just such an event
which for sure disagree with goals, plans and
intentions of God. (The superior "goal" which
God plans to accomplish continually through
the creation of the humanity and through the
control over the development of humans, and
the accomplishing of which such a "world's nuclear
war" would make impossible, is described in
item #B1 from the totaliztic web page named
antichrist.htm,
in items #B4 and #C1 of the web page named
tornado.htm,
and also on a number of other totaliztic publications.)
In turn the disagreement of the annihilation of
entire humanity with goals, plans and intentions
of God, is for us a sufficient guarantee that God
will NOT allow the starting of a "world's nuclear
war" which would kill practically all people, and
also that God is to make an example from His
treatment and fate of these politicians and their
supporters, who are pushing to start such a war.
#J5.
Is there any historical example of a
God's
method used for prevention of the
"world's nuclear war", and what this
example reveals to us:
Wygląda na to, że przykład taki istnieje.
Jest on udokumentowany niezwykłym
kamieniem istniejącym w Polsce. Ów
kamień m.in. zawiera na sobie wyryty
rok 1962 jako rok w którym w innym
przebiegu czasu rozpoczęta została "trzecia
wojna światowa" - tj. wojna w której użyta
została broń jądrowa. Wygląda więc na
to, że Prezydent John Fitzgerald Kennedy
faktycznie rozpoczął "trzecią (nuklearną)
wojnę światową" - tyle że wojna ta rozegrała
się w innym przebiegu czasu, tj. w przebiegu
czasu który następnie został cofniety do tyłu
przez Boga i kompletnie "wymazany" z pamięci
i z historii ludzkości. Fakt niezliczonego
dokonywania przez Boga takiego powtarzalnego
cofania czasu i "wymazywania" tych
przebiegów historii jakie NIE popierają
planów i intencji Boga, jest opisany np.
w punkcie #B4.1 odmiennej strony o nazwie
immortality.htm.
Dokonajmy więc tutaj przeglądu tego co
jest już wiadomo o owej wymazanej z
historii "trzeciej (nuklearnej) wojny światowej".
Przy granicy wodnej "Mokrego Stawu" zlokalizowanego
w Polsce na "Babiej Górze" (tj. na górze dawniej
szeroko znanej w całym świecie z działalności
"diabłów" i "czarownic"), znajduje się niezwykły
kamień. Kamień ten opisany jest w podrozdziałach
C5 i D1 (8) z polskojęzycznego
traktatu [4b].
Jego niezwykłość polega na tym, że już w pradawnych
czasach ktoś wyrył na nim staroniemieckie słowo
"Richter" oznaczające "sądzenie" lub "wyrok" oraz
daty trzech kolejnych wojen światowych. Daty te to
lata 1914, 1939 oraz 1962. Jak jednak wiemy, wojna
światowa z 1962 roku wcale nie wybuchła w naszym
przebiegu czasu. Cudem została ona uniknięta w
trakcie słynnego "kryzysu kubańskiego" zaistniałego
w okresie rządów Prezydenta John'a F. Kennedy'ego.
Problem jednak polega na
tym, że cud jaki spowodował uniknięcie owej wojny
światowej z 1962 roku, wcale NIE spowodował
zmiany w "programie życia i losu" jaki zawarty
był w systemie genetycznym prezydenta USA,
Johna Kennedy'ego. Stąd Kennedy nadal dążył swoimi
działaniami do wypełnienia tego "programu życia i
losu" zawartego w jego genach, usiłując rozpocząć
ową trzecią wojnę światową przy innej okazji. Bóg NIE
miał więc już innego wyjścia niż ponownie zainterweniować
i spowodować zamach na Kennedy'ego. Dzięki tej
interwencji mamy obecnie historyczny przykład
jak wygląda przebieg jakichś zdarzeń których
zaistnienie jest zarządzane bezpośrednio przez
samego Boga, a ponadto mamy też potwierdzenie
poprawności niektórych ustaleń na temat działania
czasu (opisywanych m.in. na w/w stronie
immortality.htm).
To dlatego obecnie możemy porównywać algorytm
przebiegu zamachu na Kennedy'ego (29/5/1917 -
22/11/1963) np. z algorytmem zamachu na Martin'a
Luther'a King (15/1/1929 - 4/4/1968) lub np. z
algorytmen odparowania przez UFO budynków
WTC w Nowym Jorku z dnia 11/9/2001
(odparowanie to opisane jest na stronie o nazwie
wtc.htm).
Tak nawiasem mówiąc, to do publicznej wiadomości
docierają coraz to bardziej intrygujące informacje
na temat Prezydenta John'a F. Kennedy'ego - po
ich przykład patrz artykuł "Mistress tells of JFK's
honesty and abuse" (tj. "kochanka opowiada o JFK'a
szczerości i wykorzystywaniu") ze strony A15 gazety
The New Zealand Herald,
wydanie z wtorku (Tuesday), February 7, 2012;
albo artykuł "JFK's teen mistress reveals 'matter-of-fact'
seduction" (tj. "nastoletnia kochanka JFK ujawnia
faktyczne uwiedzenie"), ze strony B2 nowozelandzkiej gazety
The Dominion Post,
wydanie z wtorku (Tuesday), February 7, 2012.
Czy jest to możliwe, że był on pierwszą publiczną
figurą oddającą się "nałogowi seksu" - na wiele lat
wcześniej niż do takiego nałogu publicznie przyznał
się najsłynniejszy do niedawna mistrz golfu.
Śmierć prezydenta Kennedy'ego może więc nam
służyć jako historyczne potwierdzenie, że Bóg jest
zdeterminowany aby NIE dopuścić do "światowej
wojny nuklearnej". Stąd jeśli kiedyś ponownie zjawi
się na Ziemi jakiś polityk który się uprze aby wojnę
taką spowodować, wówczas ów polityk zniknie z "areny
politycznej" w raczej zmyślny i wymowny sposób zanim
zdąży on rozpocząć taką wojnę. Oczywiście, gwarancja
niemożności rozpocżęcia przez ludzi "światowej
wojny nuklearnej" wcale NIE oznacza, że broń
nuklearna nigdy NIE będzie użyta na Ziemi.
Wszakże jeśli takie użycie będzie zlokalizowane,
zaś lekcje z niego wyciągnięte będą podobnie ucząco
służyły dla dobra ludzkości jak dawniejsze lekcje
z Hiroshimy, Nagasaki i Chernobyla, a także
najnowsza lekcja z katastrofy w Fukushima,
Japonia (esencja tej najnowszej lekcji opisana
jest w punktach #M1 do #M1.3 strony o nazwie
telekinetics.htm
oraz w punktach #I1 i #C7 strony o nazwie
seismograph.htm),
wówczas Bóg może pozwolić na lokalne
eksplodowanie jednej lub nawet kilku bomb
atomowych.
Part #K:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#K1.
The summary of this web page:
This web page binds together information
about two important issues. On one hand,
it reveals facts about the "battle for
Milicz" - which we cease to remember
because people who used to tell them
are gradually dying out. Because this
battle contained an essence of all
battles of the world, the web page
reveals the atmosphere that accompanied
such battles. On the other hand, this
web page emphasized mechanisms of
operation of these moral laws, which
can be identified in extreme events
taking place during the battle for Milicz.
I do hope, that the reader finds both
these issues interesting, and that he
or she draws from this presentation
correct conclusions for the future.
#K2.
Emails and contact details to the
author
of this web page:
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
inquiries, or replies to questions which I ask on
my web pages, are provided on the web page
about me (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak).
That page also provides other commonly used
contact details to the author.
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
Therefore, if the reader sends a request to me,
I suggest to let me know somehow that he or
she actually went through the trouble of reading
my web pages and learning what these pages
try to say.
#K3.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
Jeśli mówisz po polsku,
kliknij na polską flagę (if you prefer to read in Polish
click on the Polish flag)
Date of starting this page: 5 June 2004
Date of the most recent update of this web page: 12 December 2012
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
![Fig. #A1 (A1 in [1/5])](/cgi-bin/i/15/15_a1.jpg)
